How much did RJ Clark Family Foundation grant in FY2024?

Philanthropy$1.1MHuman Services$113kEducation$107kHealth$12kCrime & Legal$5kYouth Development$5kInternational$3kAnimals$1kHousing & Shelter$1kOther$741k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

creativeinnovativelivingveterans

2020

—

2021

disabilitiescomprehensivecancerfood

2022

outpatient treatmentprogramtreatmentprogram victimsvictims childchild sexualabuseanimalslovefull

2023

waterawarenessmentalanimalsfinancialfull

2024

rescuephysicaladultsabuse neglectmentalfacingcancer

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k10 grants · $29k
$10k–50k9 grants · $133k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$1.8M

Total assets

Largest grants

Boys Girls Club of Metro Denver$25,500
A Precious Child$20,000
Partners Mentoring Youth$20,000
Parker Task Force$15,000
The Children's Hospital Foundation$12,500
Judi's House$10,000
Project Sol Flower$10,000
Harmony Acres Equestrian Center$10,000
Book Trust$10,000
Food for Thought Denver$5,000
Delta Montrose Youth Services Inc$5,000
CASA of Larimer County$5,000
Tennyson Center for Children$3,000
Girls on the Run of the Rockies$3,000
Denver Rescue Mission$3,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7% — the area typically sits at 7%. 42% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.0M · 19 repeat orgs$108k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.0M

$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%

+23%

Still filing today

47%

48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesPhilanthropyHealthEducationCrime & LegalInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

JH
Judi's House
7× · 2018–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +49%
YV
Yampa Valley Autism Program
4× · 2018–2021 · $60k · revenue +152%
HA
Harmony Acres Equestrian Center
3× · 2022–2024 · $40k · revenue +323%

Funded once

SA
Steamboat Adaptive Recreational Spo
one grant, 2018 · $10k
SS
Sammie's Sunshine
one grant, 2023 · $10k
WS
Western Slope Center for Childrengraduated
one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +56%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Children's Hospital Colorado

To improve the health of children through the provision of high-quality, coordinated programs of patient care, education, research and advocacy.

Health

Advocates for Recovery Colorado

Recovery from addiction is a process of gaining sobriety and contributing to one's family and community as a healthy productive person. AFRC provides peer coach mentoring to individuals in recovery from substance use disorders.

Human Services

Colorado Wellness Center for Girls

—

Usa Triathlon of Colorado

The mission of USA Triathlon of Colorado (USAT) is to grow, inspire, and support the triathlon community.

Recreation & Sports

Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation

The mission of the Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation is to promote the health and well-being of physicians and physician assistants through evaluation, treatment referral, support education and research.

Health

Arc of West Central Colorado

The Arc of West Central Colorado promotes and protects the rights of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. We actively support their full inclusion and participation in the community throughout their lifetimes. Through…

Human Services

Colorado Healing Fund

A secure way for the public to contribute to victims of mass tragedy in Colorado

Public Safety & Disaster

Advocates for Children

To provide, train and coordinate volunteer services to abused and neglected children in the 18th Judicial District, Colorado.

Civil Rights

Friends of the Children - Colorado Sprin

Professional mentorship for youth from kindergarten through high school.

Youth Development

Grief Center of Southwest Colorado

Grief support to those who have lost a loved one.

Health

Kidpower of Colorado Inc

The mission of kidpower of colorado springs is to teach young people personal safety and confidence-building skills to reduce their risk of abduction, assault, and emotional, physical, and sexual abuse.

Crime & Legal

Colorado Artists in Recovery

Colorado Artists in Recovery utilizes recovery-oriented principles to provide a safe, encouraging, and inclusive environment for people affected by substance use and mental health. Through our workshops and events we nurture their creative…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tri-Lakes Cares and the most unlike its peers is Sacred Valley Health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/33

the rest of the field

11%

3,769/33,384

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

32 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

30/32

Grantees still filing

22/32

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Philanthropy$1,116,000Other$745,585Human Services$112,500Education$106,500Health$12,000Crime & Legal$5,000Youth Development$4,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO36.3× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Av Hunter Trust Incorporated · The Denver Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · The Denver Children's Foundation · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Adolph Coors Foundation · Pikes Peak Community Foundation · Otter Cares Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation RJ Clark Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Judi's House.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~20 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 841600797 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Judi's House, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 20 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 7% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to RJ Clark Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to RJ Clark Family Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

RJ Clark Family Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

32 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to RJ Clark Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph

RJ Clark Family Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

32 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to RJ Clark Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph