Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Rei Cooperative Action Fund

To create a more equitable outdoors by bringing together the collective strength of our community.

$5.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
257
Grants FY2024still arriving
45
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.

Environment$4.9MRecreation & Sports$3.3MYouth Development$1.9MHealth$1.2MEducation$1.2MCommunity Improvement$810kSocial Science$674kHuman Services$460kOther$0
02FY2024 · 257 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k232 grants · $3.1M
  • $50k–250k17 grants · $1.3M
  • $250k+2 grants · $700k
$10,000
Median grant
45
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION$400,000
TAKING CARE OF TEXAS DBA TEXAN BY NATURE$300,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH$150,000
CATALYST SPORTS$100,000
RISING ROUTES$100,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION INC$100,000
CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION$100,000
COALITIONS & COLLABORATIVES$100,000
HBCUS OUTSIDE$75,000
BOYZ N THE WOOD$75,000
YELLOW BIRD LIFE WAYS$50,000
OREGON WILDLIFE HERITAGE FOUNDATION$50,000
LEAVE NO TRACE$50,000
CHEYENNE RIVER YOUTH PROJECT$50,000
MOUNTAINS TO SOUND GREENWAY TRUST$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $695k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RIVER NEWE: $100k → 13%EAGLE MOUNT BILLINGS: $15k → 9%CENTRAL CALIFORNIA ADAPTIVE SPORTS CENTER: $15k → 19%ROCHESTER ACCESSIBLE ADVENTURES: $15k → 14%LA PLAZITA INSTITUTE: $100k → 14%MYTEAM TRIUMPH WISCONSIN: $15k → 10%MEMPHIS ROXONE FAMILY MEMPHIS: $50k → 17%TRIPS FOR KIDS CHARLOTTE: $10k → 10%OGDEN VALLEY ADAPTIVE SPORTS: $20k → 9%BEARINGS BIKE WORKS: $10k → 13%REFUGEE WOMEN'S NETWORK: $15k → 14%ADAPTIVE SPORTS CONNECTION: $15k → 5%QUEER NATURE: $100k → 17%LGBT OUTDOORS: $15k → 11%BLACK OUTSIDE: $50k → 16%MEMPHIS ROX: $25k → 17%BEYOND BOUNDARIES: $10k → 22%GET OUTDOORS NEVADA: $20k → 13%WOMEN'S WILDERNESS: $20k → 12%BLACKLISTLA RUN ORGANIZATION: $10k → 14%YMCA BOLD & GOLD: $50k → 9%SOUL TRAK OUTDOORS: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.3M · 36 repeat orgs$7.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

36 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 238 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
34

Total granted

$7.3M
$3.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
0%

Still filing today

92%
85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $674k · revenue +134%
  • AA
    Adaptive Adventures
    3× · 2021–2023 · $391k · revenue +25%
  • COMMUNITY INITIATIVES
    3× · 2021–2023 · $365k · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF TRACY AVIARYgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue +191%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON
    one grant, 2023 · $160k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK
    one grant, 2023 · $160k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Recreation Northwest

We teach the health benefits of nature, promote outdoor recreation, and steward the places where we play.

Recreation & Sports
2
Nature for All

Nature for all builds a diverse base of support to ensure that everyone in the losangeles area has equitable access to the wide range of benefits which natureprovides. we're committed to building support to protect, create access to…

Environment
3
Minority Outdoor Alliance
Education
4
Outdoor Alliance

Our mission is to unite the voices of outdoor enthusiasts to protect the humanpowered outdoor recreation experience and conserve Americas public lands.

Environment
5
Portland Trails

Over the next five years, portland trails will work to transform greater portland into a regional hub of connectivity and sustainability. by facilitating the expansion and enhancement of our trail network, we will foster inclusive…

Environment
6
Portland Parks Conservancy

The Portland Parks Conservancy's mission is to enhance Portland's parks and recreational programs by raising philantropic capital and engaging the community.

Human Services
7
Los Angeles River Revitalization Corporation dba River La

Engage.Protect.Enhance.Weareonamissiontobringpeople,water,andnaturetogetherwhilepursuingasustainablerevitalization of the Los Angeles River corridor.

Community Improvement
8
Bikepacking Roots

Bikepacking Roots supports and advances bikepacking the growth of a diverse bikepacking community and access to and the conservation of the landscapes and public lands through which we ride. We lower the barriers to bikepacking through…

—
9
Outdoors for Everyone Project
Health
10
Discovery Pathways

Our mission is to uplift the well-being of the community through experiential nature-based programs. By providing hands-on environmental education to urban youth and adults, we empower leaders and cultivate a connection to the natural…

Environment
11
Redwood Trails Alliance

The redwood trails alliance is an advocate for our diverse community of trail users. we teach responsible trail stewardship and offer volunteer trail work opportunities along with planning and construction services for trails for all to…

—
12
Boulder Mountainbike Alliance

The Boulder Mountainbike Alliance exists to serve as a positive voice for mountain biking in the greater Boulder County, Colorado area by improving the trail experience for all users through social rides and events, advocacy, and trail…

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Groundwork Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is One Family Memphis. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyImmigrant Worker SupportCommunity College Foundatio…Affordable Housing Developm…Lgbtq+ Community SupportCommunity FoundationsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Youth Sports ProgramsEnvironmental Conservation …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%10%<5yr14%18%5–10yr19%27%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%6%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%6%<5yr14%16%5–10yr19%31%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%13%35–55yr16%12%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%6/310
the rest of the field
13%
240,390/1,819,255

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

285 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 285 of the 310 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

14
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
34
Early backer (in before they grew)
282/285
Grantees still filing
103/285
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Taking Care of Texas — $300,000 · EnvironmentTaking Care of TexasOUTDOOR AFRO — $254,928 · EnvironmentOUTDOOR AFROEAST COAST GREENWAY ALLIANCE INC — $240,000 · EnvironmentEAST COAST GREENWAY ALLI…CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION — $200,000 · EnvironmentCONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL…FRIENDS OF THE LOS ANGELES RIVER — $175,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE LOS ANGEL…GREAT RIVER PASSAGE CONSERVANCY — $150,000 · EnvironmentOutward Bound Adventures — $150,000 · EnvironmentPark RX America — $150,000 · EnvironmentRAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY — $115,000 · Environment+46 more — $1,295,000 · Environment+46 moreUNIVERSITY OF UTAH — $310,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAHWILD DIVERSITY — $250,000 · OtherWILD DIVERSITYBOYZ N THE WOOD INC — $175,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON — $160,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK — $160,000 · OtherTEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY — $150,000 · OtherPALEONTOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTION — $150,000 · OtherNUESTRA TIERRA CONSERVATION PROJECT — $150,000 · OtherCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY — $150,000 · OtherAdaptive Adventures — $391,060 · OtherAdaptive AdventuresFRIENDS OF TRACY AVIARY — $200,000 · OtherOREGON WILDLIFE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $150,000 · OtherBlue Bird LifeWays — $150,000 · Other+56 more — $1,890,000 · Other+56 moreBLACK GIRLS RUN FOUNDATION — $332,540 · Recreation & SportsBLACK GIRLS RUN…Washington Area Bicyclist Association — $240,000 · Recreation & SportsWashington Area…Catalyst Sports Inc — $200,000 · Recreation & SportsCatalyst Sports…FRIENDS OF BIG MARSH — $150,000 · Recreation & SportsFRIENDS OF BIG …SAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE — $150,000 · Recreation & SportsSAN FRANCISCO P…YONKERS PADDLING AND ROWING CLUB INC — $100,000 · Recreation & SportsHIKE CLERB INC — $100,000 · Recreation & SportsARKANSAS LATINAS EN BICI — $100,000 · Recreation & SportsOutdoors for all Foundation — $75,000 · Recreation & SportsVERMONT ADAPTIVE SKI AND SPORTS — $75,000 · Recreation & Sports+29 more — $460,000 · Recreation & Sports+29 moreTexas A&M Foundation — $400,000 · EducationTexas A&M Foun…UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $250,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF …CHILDREN & NATURE NETWORK — $250,000 · EducationCHILDREN & NAT…THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION INC — $200,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $160,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF …GIRLTREK INCORPORATED — $155,828 · EducationGIRLTREK INCOR…UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF …ONE WORLD BRIDGE — $150,000 · EducationONE WORLD BRID…SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $100,000 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FU…+3 more — $40,000 · EducationTHE VENTURE OUT PROJECT INC — $355,828 · Youth DevelopmentTHE VENTUR…HBCUS OUTSIDE INCORPORATED — $175,000 · Youth DevelopmentHBCUS OUTS…CHEYENNE RIVER YOUTH PROJECT INC — $150,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHEYENNE R…ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING FOR KIDS — $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentENVIRONMEN…CONSERVATION LEGACY — $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentCONSERVATI…DINE WE CAN — $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentDINE WE CA…ELSO INC — $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentELSO INCCity Kids to Wilderness Project Inc — $75,000 · Youth DevelopmentCity Kids …OUTDOOR OUTREACH — $75,000 · Youth DevelopmentOUTDOOR OU…+10 more — $135,000 · Youth Development+10 moreCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES — $365,020 · PhilanthropyPLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC — $287,560 · PhilanthropyThe Trauma Foundation — $150,000 · PhilanthropyFriends of Anacostia Park — $100,000 · PhilanthropyJUSTICE OUTSIDE — $50,000 · PhilanthropyTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $673,940 · Social Science
Environment$3,029,928Other$4,436,060Recreation & Sports$1,982,540Education$1,855,828Youth Development$1,365,828Philanthropy$952,580Social Science$673,940

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $673,940 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation — $400,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAdaptive Adventures — $391,060 over 3y, 9.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES — $365,020 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE VENTURE OUT PROJECT INC — $355,828 over 3y, 24% of budgetBLACK GIRLS RUN FOUNDATION — $332,540 over 3y, 45% of budgetTaking Care of Texas — $300,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetPLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC — $287,560 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetOUTDOOR AFRO — $254,928 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWILD DIVERSITY — $250,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetCHILDREN & NATURE NETWORK — $250,000 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetEAST COAST GREENWAY ALLIANCE INC — $240,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetWashington Area Bicyclist Association — $240,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetCatalyst Sports Inc — $200,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION INC — $200,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF TRACY AVIARY — $200,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetCONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION — $200,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE LOS ANGELES RIVER — $175,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetHBCUS OUTSIDE INCORPORATED — $175,000 over 2y, 41% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $160,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLTREK INCORPORATED — $155,828 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetCHEYENNE RIVER YOUTH PROJECT INC — $150,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetGREAT RIVER PASSAGE CONSERVANCY — $150,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetOutward Bound Adventures — $150,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetPALEONTOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTION — $150,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetBlue Bird LifeWays — $150,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetOREGON WILDLIFE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetThe Trauma Foundation — $150,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetNUESTRA TIERRA CONSERVATION PROJECT — $150,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF BIG MARSH — $150,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE — $150,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetONE WORLD BRIDGE — $150,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetRAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY — $115,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetGROUNDWORK USA INC — $100,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING FOR KIDS — $100,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetRios to Rivers — $100,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetRestoring Lifeways — $100,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetFriends of Anacostia Park — $100,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetSouth River Watershed Alliance — $100,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetSAVED BY NATURE — $100,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetCONSERVATION LEGACY — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLA PLAZITA INSTITUTE — $100,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetNORTH AMERICAN NATIVE RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetSINGING RIVER TRAIL — $100,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetYONKERS PADDLING AND ROWING CLUB INC — $100,000 over 1y, 57% of budgetCOALITIONS & COLLABORATIVES INC — $100,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

PatagoniaorgNational Recreation F…Clif Family FoundationNational Park Foundat…Move UnitedJustice OutsideThe Schmidt Family Fo…Resources Legacy FundThe Keith Campbell Fo…Christopher Reeve Fou…Outride fka The Speci…National Forest Found…
PatagoniaorgCA68.4× affinity60 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Patagoniaorg · National Recreation Foundation Incorporated · Clif Family Foundation · National Park Foundation · Move United · Justice Outside · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Resources Legacy Fund · The Keith Campbell Foundation for the Environment Inc · Christopher Reeve Foundation · Outride fka The Specialized Foundation · National Forest Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rei Cooperative Action Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 130%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Northwest Youth Corps — 100% of income from government
  • Friends of Trees — 100% of income from government
  • Elso Inc — 100% of income from government
  • New Jersey Tree Foundation — 100% of income from government
  • All Out Adventures Inc — 47% of income from government
  • Urban Nature Partners Pdx — 34% of income from government
  • Connecticut Forest & Park Association — 16% of income from government
  • Oregon Wildlife Heritage Foundation — 16% of income from government
  • Vermont Adaptive Ski and Sports — 11% of income from government
  • Living Classrooms Foundation — 7% of income from government
  • Alachua Conservation Trust Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Hunters of Color — 4% of income from government
  • Groundwork Jacksonville Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Bikes Not Bombs Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Crossroads for Kids Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Emerald Necklace Conservancy Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
13get no government money at all
59report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
4rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 310 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home