How much did RICHARD C GRAHAM FAMILY CHARITABLE FD grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 51% of RICHARD C GRAHAM FAMILY CHARITABLE FD’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,431

Median grant

States reached

$1.2M

Total assets

Largest grants

PARTNERS IN HEALTH$5,494
LOAVES & FISHES FOOD PANTRY INC$5,432
EAST OAKLAND BOXING ASSOCIATION$5,432
THE WOMEN'S INITIATIVE$5,431
ALAMEDA FOOD BANK$5,431
BIKE EAST BAY$5,431
THE FRONT PORCH$5,431
ATHENS LAND TRUST$5,400
TREVOR PROJECT$5,400

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$311k · 9 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$311k

$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%

+28%

Still filing today

78%

64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Food & NutritionAnimalsHealthArts & CultureCivil RightsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TW
THE WOMEN'S INITIATIVE
8× · 2017–2024 · $73k · revenue +101%
LF
LOAVES & FISHES FOOD PANTRY INC
5× · 2020–2024 · $37k · revenue +52%
RP
REGIONAL PARKS FOUNDATION
3× · 2018–2020 · $27k · revenue +16%

Funded once

LF
LOAVES & FISHES
one grant, 2019 · $11k · revenue +18%
LN
LOVE NO EGO FOUNDATION
one grant, 2018 · $10k
AP
ALAMEDA POINT COLLABORATIVE
one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue -12%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Alameda Emergency Food

Founded in 1977, The Alameda Food Bank is a non-profit organization that helps Alameda residents in need by providing nourishing food in compassionate and respectful manner with the support of dedicated volunteers and local partners.

Food & Nutrition

Friends of the Alameda Animal Shelter

Friends of the alameda animal shelter (faas), a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, manages the open-intake city of alameda shelter. faas never euthanizes for time or space; saving, on average, 97% of the nearly 1000 lost and homeless animals who enter…

Animals

Loaves and Fishes

"rescue" excess perishable food and deliver it to charitable organizations

Food & Nutrition

Bay Area Community Services Housing Corp

Improve the quality of life for the people in alameda and conta costa counties, california with specific needs imposed by age or disability.

Housing & Shelter

Sacramento Loaves & Fishes

In an environment of hospitality, safety and cleanliness, we seek to provide an oasis for homeless men, women, and children seeking survival services. we provide meals and services, support staff to assist guests by directing them to…

Human Services

Alameda County Community Food Bank

Alameda county community food bank passionately pursues a hunger-free community.

—

Family Violence Law Center

Family Violence Law Center ("FVLC") helps diverse communities in Alameda County heal from domestic violence and sexual assault, advocating for justice and healthy relationships. We provide survivor-centered legal and crisis intervention…

Crime & Legal

Port Angeles Food Bank

Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.

Food & Nutrition

Alameda County Homeless Action Center

To provide legal services to homeless and low-income residents of Alameda County.

Housing & Shelter

Alta Housing

Foster, develop, acquire, rehabilitate, manage, operate low and moderate income housing in palo alto, ca.

Housing & Shelter

East Bay Community Law Center

The largest provider of free legal services in alameda county, (continued on schedule o)assisting low income community members with housing, health, immigration, public benefits, criminal records, education rights, juvenile defense,…

Crime & Legal

Loving All Animals Inc

To maximize programs intended to stop killing of adoptable animals.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Loaves & Fishes Food Pantry Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hospice of the Piedmont Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

15/15

Grantees still filing

13/15

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$206,241Health$73,416Food & Nutrition$54,977Civil Rights$22,843Environment$17,175Human Services$8,000Animals$7,458

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charlottesville Area CommunityVA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charlottesville Area Community · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation RICHARD C GRAHAM FAMILY CHARITABLE FD funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ALAMEDA MEALS ON WHEELS.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~10 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 9 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

9 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +54% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 942299811 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ALAMEDA MEALS ON WHEELS, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 10 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 2% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Richard C Graham Family Charitable Fd?

Find your warmest path to Richard C Graham Family Charitable Fd through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

RICHARD C GRAHAM FAMILY CHARITABLE FD

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Richard C Graham Family Charitable Fd?

More from the funding graph

RICHARD C GRAHAM FAMILY CHARITABLE FD

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Richard C Graham Family Charitable Fd?

More from the funding graph