Skip to content

California · Public charity

California ReLeaf

California Releaf's mission is to empower grassroots efforts and build strategic partnerships that preserve, protect and enhance California's urban and community forests.

$160k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
10
Itemized grants FY2025
13
Organizations funded FY2024
0%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$80k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$8,696
Largest grant, FY2025
$10,189
Organizations funded a year
13 to 29
FY2017 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$709k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations California ReLeaf funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEmploymentFood & NutritionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving10$80k80%
FY202413$557k0%
FY202322$614k27%
FY202229$608k45%
FY202118$473k39%
FY202024$827k83%
FY201814$303k14%
FY201717$300kn/a
96% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$3.7MRecreation & Sports$230kCommunity Improvement$147kHuman Services$139kEducation$99kFood & Nutrition$54kArts & Culture$48kReligion$47kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Sustainable Claremont$233,023833%
Amigos de Los Rios$226,65854%
North East Trees Inc$169,37473%
California ReLeaf$156,40826%
Common Vision$138,47358%
Redding Parks Foundation$121,389412%
Treepeople Inc$117,52330%
Clean & Green Pomona$116,4353n/a
Butte Environmental Council$113,549430%
Circuit Rider Community Services$104,99946%
Show all 65 grantees
All grantees of California ReLeaf by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Sustainable Claremont$233,023833%
Amigos de Los Rios$226,65854%
North East Trees Inc$169,37473%
California ReLeaf$156,40826%
Common Vision$138,47358%
Redding Parks Foundation$121,389412%
Treepeople Inc$117,52330%
Clean & Green Pomona$116,4353n/a
Butte Environmental Council$113,549430%
Circuit Rider Community Services$104,99946%
North Coast Opportunities Inc$99,96520%
California Climate Action Now$87,9752n/a
Chicana Directors Initiative$83,1113n/a
Earth Island Institute Inc$82,75810%
Oroville Botanic Garden and Educational Center$79,7213n/a
Watsonville Wetlands Watch$78,06033%
Calipatria Chamber of Commerce$74,918259%
Urban Corps of San Diego County$72,22220%
Tree Fresno$71,19538%
From Lot to Spot$69,1044n/a
Tree San Diego$64,410210%
Madera Coalition of Community Justice$62,33922%
Southeast Fresno Community Economic Development Assn$62,076325%
Paradise Recreation and Park District$61,4282n/a
Center for Regenerative Agriculture$58,399222%
Earthteam$50,54228%
California Climate Action Now$50,2472n/a
People and Trees Inc$48,2362n/a
Episcopal Impact Fund FKA Episcopal Charities$47,43724%
Oakland Parks and Recreation Foundation$47,33022%
Puentes$43,9992n/a
Green Technical Education and Employment$43,99533%
Yuba Sutter Regional Arts Council$35,83634%
A Cleaner Greener East La$33,1601n/a
Friends of Santa Ana Zoo$33,07213%
Pacific Housing Inc$30,75320%
Our City Forest$30,48312%
Fathers and Families of San Joaquin$26,95711%
City of Petaluma$26,7761n/a
Environmental Center of San Luis Obispo$24,98325%
Lumbercycle$23,991211%
Woodland Tree Foundation$23,3372n/a
Regional Parks Foundation$18,38710%
Empowerment Works Inc$15,41711%
Your Childrens Trees$15,0631n/a
Avenal Historical Society$15,0581n/a
City Trees$14,9421n/a
The Watershed Project$13,77512%
Victoria Avenue Forever$12,3371n/a
San Bernardino Fatherhood$12,130110%
United Latinos Promoviendo Accion Civica$10,1891n/a
Social and Environmental Entr$10,0001n/a
Community Action for a Sustainable Alameda$10,0001n/a
Los Amigos De Guadalupe California$9,6601n/a
Ventura Tree Alliance$8,6961n/a
Sustainable Solano Inc$8,13611%
Little Manila Rising$8,0001n/a
El Dorado Community Health Center$7,00010%
The Climate Center$6,63910%
Canopy$6,50010%
San Joaquin River Parkway & Conservation Trust$6,16410%
Sisters in Birth$5,50012%
Food Exploration and Discovery$5,50012%
Rebuilding Together Petaluma Inc$5,08610%
Koreatown Youth and Community Center$5,02210%

Plus 8 recipients with no EIN on record ($306k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

California ReLeaf supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 3 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 43 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSustainable Claremont: $233,023 over 8y, 33% of budgetAmigos de Los Rios: $226,658 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetNorth East Trees Inc: $169,374 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetCalifornia ReLeaf: $156,408 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetCommon Vision: $138,473 over 5y, 7.7% of budgetRedding Parks Foundation: $121,389 over 4y, 12% of budgetTreepeople Inc: $117,523 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetButte Environmental Council: $113,549 over 4y, 30% of budgetCircuit Rider Community Services: $104,999 over 4y, 5.9% of budgetNorth Coast Opportunities Inc: $99,965 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetEarth Island Institute Inc: $82,758 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWatsonville Wetlands Watch: $78,060 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetCalipatria Chamber of Commerce: $74,918 over 2y, 59% of budgetUrban Corps of San Diego County: $72,222 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTree Fresno: $71,195 over 3y, 8.4% of budgetTree San Diego: $64,410 over 2y, 9.9% of budgetMadera Coalition of Community Justice: $62,339 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetSoutheast Fresno Community Economic Development Assn: $62,076 over 3y, 25% of budgetCenter for Regenerative Agriculture: $58,399 over 2y, 22% of budgetEarthteam: $50,542 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetEpiscopal Impact Fund FKA Episcopal Charities: $47,437 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetOakland Parks and Recreation Foundation: $47,330 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetGreen Technical Education and Employment: $43,995 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetYuba Sutter Regional Arts Council: $35,836 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetFriends of Santa Ana Zoo: $33,072 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetPacific Housing Inc: $30,753 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetOur City Forest: $30,483 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetFathers and Families of San Joaquin: $26,957 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetEnvironmental Center of San Luis Obispo: $24,983 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetLumbercycle: $23,991 over 2y, 11% of budgetRegional Parks Foundation: $18,387 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEmpowerment Works Inc: $15,417 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetThe Watershed Project: $13,775 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSan Bernardino Fatherhood: $12,130 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetSustainable Solano Inc: $8,136 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetEl Dorado Community Health Center: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Climate Center: $6,639 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCanopy: $6,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSan Joaquin River Parkway & Conservation Trust: $6,164 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSisters in Birth: $5,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetFood Exploration and Discovery: $5,500 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetRebuilding Together Petaluma Inc: $5,086 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKoreatown Youth and Community Center: $5,022 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 43.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

PatagoniaorgCA20× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Patagoniaorg · The San Francisco Foundation · National Arbor Day Foundation · The Rose Foundation for Communities the Environment · East Bay Community Foundation · The California Endowment · Resources Legacy Fund · Liberty Hill Foundation · Clif Family Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Marin Community Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare California ReLeaf with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to California ReLeaf?

Find your warmest path to California ReLeaf through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About California ReLeaf

How much does California ReLeaf give?
California ReLeaf reported 10 itemized grants totaling $79,940, out of $160,440 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 13 and 29 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2024.
What does California ReLeaf fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Environment (77%), Recreation & Sports (5%), Community Improvement (3%).
Who are California ReLeaf's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Sustainable Claremont ($233k), Amigos de Los Rios ($227k), North East Trees Inc ($169k).
Does California ReLeaf fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as California ReLeaf?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Patagoniaorg, The San Francisco Foundation, National Arbor Day Foundation.
Where is California ReLeaf based?
California ReLeaf is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on California ReLeaf’s filings →

More from the funding graph