Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Arizona · Nonprofit

QUENCHED

QUENCHED (Arizona) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $173,586 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($56,704). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 50% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$646k
Revenue FY2024
7
Funders on record
$174k
Grants received
$361k
Net assets
5/7 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 10%

Against its field

QUENCHED has grown faster than three-quarters of the 21,584 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−3% · below the median
Months of reserve6.2mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)27% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 21,584 human services nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($118k) Expenses 100 ($84k) Net assets 100 ($43k)2019 Revenue 209 ($246k) Expenses 228 ($191k) Net assets 196 ($84k)2020 Revenue 226 ($267k) Expenses 211 ($177k) Net assets 406 ($173k)2021 Revenue 341 ($403k) Expenses 345 ($289k) Net assets 672 ($287k)2022 Revenue 377 ($445k) Expenses 529 ($443k) Net assets 676 ($288k)2023 Revenue 455 ($537k) Expenses 529 ($444k) Net assets 894 ($382k)2024 Revenue 547 ($646k) Expenses 795 ($666k) Net assets 847 ($361k)
2017201920202021202220232024
Revenue (547)Expenses (795)Net assets (847)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

99% of QUENCHED’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (91% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 23,813 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

$34k
17
$55k
19
$90k
20
$113k
21
$2k
22
$93k
23
$20k
24
6.2
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 5 funders, grant income rose $2k → $31k.

3 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)50% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of QUENCHED’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

QUENCHED leans on a few funders — its largest provides 33% of grant income and the top three 73%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

61% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund QUENCHED.

33%
largest funder
73%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2019 76% · 2020 96% · 2021 93% · 2022 49% · 2023 45%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

50% of QUENCHED's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $86k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside Arizona, across 4 states.

NY
MA
OH
CA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
19
20
21
22
23
Arizona out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $87k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like QUENCHED

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Arizona

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

85% of spending goes to programs.

Program 85%Management 8%Fundraising 7%

Governance

6
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

88%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for QUENCHED: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds QUENCHED?
QUENCHED (Arizona) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $173,586 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($56,704). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 50% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does QUENCHED have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $173,586 in grants to QUENCHED, 5 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of QUENCHED?
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $56,704 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like QUENCHED find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Arizona. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing