How much did MABRY FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 57% of MABRY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

pregnancy

2020

—

2021

—

2022

—

2023

—

2024

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k6 grants · $40k
$10k–50k9 grants · $222k
$50k–250k3 grants · $230k

$16,300

Median grant

States reached

$9.0M

Total assets

Largest grants

ALONG SIDE MINISTRIES$103,444
VENTURA COUNTY RESCUE MISSION$65,000
WILDERNESS TRAILS$61,100
HARVEST HOME$40,000
PHOENIX INNER CITY KIDS$35,422
CLEAR WATER PROJECT$33,130
CITY CENTER VENTURA$32,222
QUENCHED$25,000
SOUTHERN OREGON AXE OF KINDNESS$16,300
URBAN PROMISE$15,000
AGAPE HOUSE OF PRESCOTT$14,694
AFTER HOURS MINISTRY$10,420
YOUTH 71FIVE MINISTRIES$9,209
HOPE WOMENS CENTER$8,775
HOPE IN NUMBERS$7,183

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $354k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 11%. 86% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 47% of MABRY FOUNDATION’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 52% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 29% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

MABRY FOUNDATIONlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$932k · 15 repeat orgs$335k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$932k

$168k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+125%

+2226%

Still filing today

60%

10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $167k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthReligionEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

AS
ALONG SIDE MINISTRIES
3× · 2022–2024 · $177k · revenue +50%
WT
WILDERNESS TRAILS
6× · 2018–2024 · $164k · revenue +56%
HH
HARVEST HOME
2× · 2021–2024 · $59k · revenue +223%

Funded once

SO
SPIRIT OF SANTA PAULAgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $45k · revenue +2226%
OI
OC INTERNATIONAL
one grant, 2018 · $25k
HL
HUME LAKE CHRISTIAN CAMPS
one grant, 2023 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Horizon Pregnancy Center

Our mission is to encourage anyone impacted by an unplanned pregnancy to choose life. We are a free, safe and confidential Christ-centered pregnancy medical clinic, providing hope and healing through counseling, education, encouraging…

Health

Village of Hope

We exist to be a Village of Hope for pregnant women in crisis, equipping them to break unhealthy cycles and create generational blessings through God's love.

Animals

My Choices

To share the truth and love of Jesus Christ in conjunction with a ministry to those facing pregnancy related issues: a pregnant womens' counseling program, a free pregnancy testing program, a maternity support (baby supplies, clothing and…

Health

Intimate Life Ministries

—

Pregnancy Care Center

The Pregnancy Care Center is a Christian organization to promote the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and to boldly endorse the sacredness of all human life, by providing comprehensive, practical services as enduring alternatives to abortion.

—

Hope Crisis Pregnancy Center

The mission of hope pregnancy resource center is to reach out in love with life affirming services that empower parents to choose life for their unborn babies. our christ-centered ministry strives to bring about an abortion free community…

—

Agape Women's Services

Womens Services is a Gospel-centered,life-affirming medical clinic for the Johnson City area that provides free services to women, including pregnancy and STI testing, sexual health consultations, and limited ultrasounds. We also provide…

Health

Abigail Women's Clinic - Pregnancy Outreach Center

Abigail Womens Clinic's mission is to provide free and confidential services, education,counseling, support, and encouragement to individuals allowing them to make healthy choices related to sexuality and childbearing from a Biblical point…

Health

Pregnancy Resource Center of Salt Lake

Believing that every person is created in the image of God, the Pregnancy Resource Center of Salt Lake is a Christ-centered ministry that provides an environment of safety and hope to those experiencing unplanned pregnancies and pregnancy…

Human Services

Kingdom Ministries

Provides Maternity Care, Housing, Parenting, Life Skills Classes, and wellness services, including counseling to expectant mothers who have chosen life over abortion.

Youth Development

Family Promise - Salt Lake

We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.

Housing & Shelter

Lifecare Pregnancy Resources Inc

Sharing the gospel message and upholding the sanctity of human life by demonstrating the love of Christ to men and women facing unplanned pregnancies by providing spiritual, physical, and emotional support.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Agape House of Prescott Inc and the most unlike its peers is Southern Oregon Axe of Kindness. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

06the grantee network

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

14/16

Grantees still filing

15/16

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$726,542Human Services$353,918Religion$70,000Health$54,434Philanthropy$33,130Education$20,000Youth Development$9,209

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Washington Federal FoundationWA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Washington Federal Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation MABRY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: SOUTHERN OREGON AXE OF KINDNESS.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~4 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 3 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 392.1× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 920434814 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on SOUTHERN OREGON AXE OF KINDNESS, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 4 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 42% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Mabry Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Mabry Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

MABRY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Mabry Foundation?

More from the funding graph

MABRY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Mabry Foundation?

More from the funding graph