Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

East 91st Street Christian Church Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$150k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 61% of East 91st Street Christian Church Foundation Inc’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $63k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $87k
$7,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Young Life$20,850
Alexander Christian Foundation$20,000
House of Bread Church Bethleham$15,000
CMFI$11,000
East 91st Street Christian Church$10,120
OMF International$10,000
Polish Christian Ministry$8,194
Individual grant recipient$8,194
Fair Haven Foundation Inc$7,500
Love at Work Ministries$6,400
Jesus Inside Prison Ministry$6,000
Life Centers$5,000
Crescent Project$5,000
The Ark Christian Ministries$5,000
Great Lakes Christian College$4,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Bryantsville Hunger Relief Project: $3k → 12%Shepard Community Center: $10k → 16%Shepard Community Center: $5k → 16%Shepard Community Center: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
OR
IN
OH
PA
CA
CO
MO
KY
MD
AZ
TN
NC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$612k · 21 repeat orgs$138k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
19

Total granted

$612k
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+1%

Still filing today

48%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionInternationalEducationHealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LIFE CENTERS INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $28k · revenue +39%
  • SC
    Shepherd Community Inc
    3× · 2020–2024 · $20k · revenue +52%
  • TA
    The Ark Christian Ministries
    4× · 2020–2025 · $18k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • PR
    PEACE RESTORED INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +108%
  • TB
    The BLVD Church
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • GV
    Grace Vision Services
    one grant, 2023 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Life International Christian Ministry Inc

Our mission is proclaiming the message of salvation through the saving power of the Holy Spirit to reach the unreached by evangelizing; motivating, mobilizing and organizing the body of Christ.

Religion
2
Churches in Missions Inc

Mobilization of churches in America by taking pastors and laymen on vision and service trips overseas in fulfillment of Jesus command to go ye into all the world, making disciples...

Human Services
3
Grace Global Ministries Inc

Grace Global Ministries exists to assist local churches in sending global workers to fulfill the Great Commission.

International
4
Global Impact Ministries Inc Dba Love Life

Love Life is uniting and mobilizing the church to create a culture of love and life that will bring an end to abortion and the orphan crisis.

Religion
5
Next Worldwide Inc

With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.

6
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

7
Passionlife Ministries Inc

Passionlife ministries is a global missions initiative to spread the gospel of life and expand the pregnancy help movement among nations plagued by abortion, infanticide and gendercide.

Religion
8
Reconciliation Ministries International Inc

Reconciliaton Ministries Intl. is a Christian evangelical organization preaching and teaching the Word of God in over 60 countries. The ministry equips and encourages Christians everywhere to be saved, healed, and delivered according to…

Religion
9
Ambassadors for Christ International - Usa Inc

Ambassadors for Christ International - USA is a fellowship of gospel preachers and teachers whose mission is to preach Christ, edify the Church, and to glorify God and serve as a catalyst for revival, evangelism, and training of Christians…

Religion
10
Global Mobilization Ministries Inc

To support christian ministries throughout the world

Religion
11
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
12
Greg Fritz Ministries Inc

To proclaim gospel of jesus.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ascent 121 Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bryantsville Hunger Relief Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Missionary Organi…Christian Youth CampsPregnancy Support ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Public University Foundatio…Domestic Violence Crisis Se…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%4%<5yr13%4%5–10yr18%33%10–20yr14%21%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr23%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%1%<5yr13%3%5–10yr18%34%10–20yr14%9%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr23%38%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/30
the rest of the field
10%
4,324/41,965

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/27
Grantees still filing
13/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EAST 91ST STREET CHRISTIAN CHURCH — $79,805 · OtherEAST 91ST STREET CHRISTIAN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient — $57,953 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCMFI — $55,100 · OtherCMFIPolish Christian Ministry — $50,928 · OtherPolish Christian MinistryYoung Life — $50,850 · OtherYoung LifeJESUS INSIDE PRISON MINISTRY INC — $16,000 · Other+23 more — $155,817 · Other+23 moreALEXANDER CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC — $121,000 · EducationALEXANDER CHRISTIAN …CENTRAL CHRISTIAN COLLEGE OF THE BIBLE — $10,000 · EducationCENTRAL CHRISTIAN CO…+1 more — $4,000 · EducationLIFE CENTERS INC — $27,500 · HealthPEACE RESTORED INC — $10,000 · HealthFAIR HAVEN FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 · HealthThe Ark Christian Ministries — $17,500 · ReligionE3 Partners Ministry — $11,400 · ReligionNEW LIFE MINISTRIES — $5,000 · ReligionGlobal City Missions Initiative Incorporated — $5,000 · ReligionKAIROS BENEVOLENCE FUND — $4,500 · ReligionShepherd Community Inc — $20,000 · Human ServicesASCENT 121 INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesBRYANTSVILLE HUNGER RELIEF PROJECT INC — $3,000 · Human ServicesVISION NICARAGUA — $10,000 · InternationalLove at Work Ministries Inc — $6,400 · InternationalFountains of Hope International Inc — $6,000 · InternationalJUBILEE VILLAGE PROJECT INC — $2,000 · InternationalREFUGE FOR WOMEN INC — $12,500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$466,453Education$135,000Health$45,000Religion$43,400Human Services$28,000International$24,400Housing & Shelter$12,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetALEXANDER CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC — $121,000 over 6y, 18% of budgetLIFE CENTERS INC — $27,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetShepherd Community Inc — $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Ark Christian Ministries — $17,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetJESUS INSIDE PRISON MINISTRY INC — $16,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetREFUGE FOR WOMEN INC — $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetE3 Partners Ministry — $11,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL CHRISTIAN COLLEGE OF THE BIBLE — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVISION NICARAGUA — $10,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetPEACE RESTORED INC — $10,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetFAIR HAVEN FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLove at Work Ministries Inc — $6,400 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetFountains of Hope International Inc — $6,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCapstone Legacy Foundation Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASCENT 121 INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNEW LIFE MINISTRIES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW MISSION SYSTEMS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGlobal City Missions Initiative Incorporated — $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetKAIROS BENEVOLENCE FUND — $4,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGREAT LAKES BIBLE COLLEGE — $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION FIND & FEED INC — $3,200 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetNational Network of Youth Ministries — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA RIGHT TO LIFE INCORPORATED — $2,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALEXANDER CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds LIFE CENTERS INC
  • Who funds Shepherd Community Inc
  • Who funds The Ark Christian Ministries
  • Who funds JESUS INSIDE PRISON MINISTRY INC
  • Who funds REFUGE FOR WOMEN INC
  • Who funds E3 Partners Ministry
  • Who funds CENTRAL CHRISTIAN COLLEGE OF THE BIBLE
  • Who funds VISION NICARAGUA
  • Who funds PEACE RESTORED INC
  • Who funds FAIR HAVEN FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Love at Work Ministries Inc
  • Who funds Fountains of Hope International Inc
  • Who funds Capstone Legacy Foundation Inc
  • Who funds ASCENT 121 INC
  • Who funds NEW LIFE MINISTRIES
  • Who funds NEW MISSION SYSTEMS INC
  • Who funds CRESCENT PROJECT INC
  • Who funds Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated
  • Who funds KAIROS BENEVOLENCE FUND
  • Who funds GREAT LAKES BIBLE COLLEGE
  • Who funds OPERATION FIND & FEED INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncIN15.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization East 91st Street Christian Church Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to East 91st Street Christian Church Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to East 91st Street Christian Church Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph