· Private foundation
Stoller Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k36 grants · $187k
- $10k–50k79 grants · $1.7M
- $50k–250k71 grants · $7.0M
- $250k+30 grants · $24M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE TRUSTBRIDGE GLOBAL TEAM | $5,000,000 |
| NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION | $2,408,400 |
| STRATEGIC RESOURCE GROUP | $2,000,000 |
| BILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION | $1,550,000 |
| TX ARMS OF LOVE | $1,300,000 |
| GLOBAL AHEAD INC | $1,107,875 |
| YOUVERSION | $1,000,000 |
| GROUNDWIRE | $750,000 |
| FOOD FOR THE CITIES | $700,000 |
| DIAMOND WILLOW MINISTRIES | $600,000 |
| ONE HOPE INC | $525,000 |
| NABOR HOUSE COMMUNITY | $500,000 |
| THE JESUS FILM PROJECT OF CRU | $500,000 |
| PIONEER MISSIONS GLOBAL | $500,000 |
| DOOR INTERNATIONAL | $500,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $3.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 6% of Stoller Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
160 repeat relationships — 107 still active in FY2024, 53 since wound down; 107 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NHNABOR HOUSE COMMUNITY7× · 2017–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +41% · 72% of their budget
- GAGlobal Ahead Inc4× · 2021–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +41%
- EOEyes On Me Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +237% · 27% of their budget
Funded once
- IFILLUMINATIONS FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2023 · $960k · revenue -5%
- ANALL NATIONS SPORTSone grant, 2017 · $372k · revenue +18% · 67% of their budget
- PCPASSION CONFERENCESone grant, 2023 · $300k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…
Our mission is proclaiming the message of salvation through the saving power of the Holy Spirit to reach the unreached by evangelizing; motivating, mobilizing and organizing the body of Christ.
Religious
Religious
Serving and pastoring overseas workers on their own turf and equipping nationals by training and empowering them in their work of advancing the gospel.
To provide strategic teaching about prayer, prophecy, and intercession in the US and abroad. Books, manuals, and audio teachings are also used to equip Christians in strategic level spiritual prayer and warfare.
Raise Up Global Ministries is committed to educating Christian leaders in communities around the world. The three programs of Raise Up equip the global church by 1 Developing biblically based interactive materials and 2 Training…
Mobilization of churches in America by taking pastors and laymen on vision and service trips overseas in fulfillment of Jesus command to go ye into all the world, making disciples...
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth for Christ Houston and the most unlike its peers is Global Ahead Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
174 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 174 of the 337 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NABOR HOUSE COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds STRATEGIC RESOURCE GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds Global Ahead Inc ↗
- Who funds Eyes On Me Inc ↗
- Who funds CHAMPION MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds ILLUMINATIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Living Water International ↗
- Who funds FOOD FOR THE CITIES ↗
- Who funds PIONEER MISSIONS GLOBAL ↗
- Who funds DIAMOND WILLOW MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds The Bucket Ministry ↗
- Who funds THE WORKFAITH CONNECTION ↗
- Who funds SpringSpirit Inc ↗
- Who funds MISSIONINVEST USA ↗
- Who funds ALL NATIONS SPORTS ↗
- Who funds MATTHEW 1323 MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds ELEVATE NAVAJO ↗
- Who funds CURE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds OPERACION SAN ANDRES ↗
- Who funds HARVEST FOR THE HUNGRY INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH TEXAS YOUTH FOR CHRIST ↗
- Who funds FREESTYLE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds MISSION OF HOPE INC MISSION OF HOPE HAITI INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Baxter Trust Co Private Foundation Services · Hildebrand Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Greater Houston Community Foundation · More Than The Move Foundation DBA Hope Legacy Collective · Servant Foundation · International Generosity Foundation Trust · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · The Bolick Foundation · The Houston Food Bank · G II Charities
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Stoller Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.