· Public charity
The Andersons Fund Supporting Organization
THE ANDERSONS FUND SUPPORTING ORGANIZATION was created to enrich the quality of life for individuals and families in our region.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $186k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TOLEDO ALLIANCE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS - TAPA | $50,000 |
| MOM'S HOUSE OF TOLEDO | $25,000 |
| CHERRY STREET MISSION MINISTRIES | $20,000 |
| YMCA AND JCC OF GREATER TOLEDO | $20,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WOOD COUNTY | $20,000 |
| TOLEDO MUSLIM DOCTORS INITIATIVE | $20,000 |
| BITTERSWEET FARMS | $15,000 |
| MOBILE MEALS OF TOLEDO | $15,000 |
| PERRYSBURG HEIGHTS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION | $10,500 |
| BEACH HOUSE INC DBA LEADING FAMILIES HOME | $10,000 |
| THE ABILITY CENTER OF GREATER TOLEDO | $10,000 |
| CATHOLIC CLUB | $10,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - MAUMEE VALLEY | $10,000 |
| CHILDREN'S RESOURCE CENTER | $7,500 |
| LEADERSHIP TOLEDO | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $366k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
26 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $91k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YOYWCA OF NORTHWEST OHIO2× · 2017–2021 · $96k · revenue +148%
- TATOLEDO ALLIANCE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS3× · 2018–2024 · $85k · revenue +41%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TOLEDO AND THE TOLEDO NEWSBOYS ASSOCIATION3× · 2018–2023 · $63k · revenue +147%
Funded once
- CRCAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue -8%
- TSTOLEDO SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND INCone grant, 2022 · $33k · revenue +9%
- SASO ALL MAY EAT INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +45%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide children of working and student parents with quality, affordable childcare programs devoted to enhancing the child's educational, social, emotional, and physical development. to provide also the parent with the childcare…
Toledo Legal Aid Society provides legal representation for indigent clients that are charged with criminal, traffic, or juvenile offenses for which the penalty or any possible adjudication includes the potential loss of liberty.
To solve critical business challenges in order to create vibrant economic opportunities for all in our region.
See schedule oto create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home…
To enable other community organizations to end hunger. we strive to maximize community resources by effectively obtaining and distributing food through a food collection and distribution system.
Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.
Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.
Provide services to people with disabilities. such services include assistance with housing, employment, transportation and recreational issues.
To provide opportunities to individualsover 50 years of age in tuscarawas county, ohiothrough healthy living, independence, physical andmental health, education, and recreational programs
The community shelter board is ending homelessness by creating collaborations, innovating solutions, and investing in quality programs.
The ohio district 5 area agency on aging, inc. provides leadership, collaboration, coordination and services to older adults, people with disabilities, their caregivers and resource networks that support individual choice, independence and…
To create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home health care…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Toledo Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Open Door Ministry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER TOLEDO ↗
- Who funds YWCA OF NORTHWEST OHIO ↗
- Who funds TOLEDO ALLIANCE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds CHERRY STREET MISSION MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TOLEDO AND THE TOLEDO NEWSBOYS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MOM'S HOUSE INC OF TOLEDO ↗
- Who funds MOBILE MEALS OF TOLEDO INC ↗
- Who funds CAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LOTT INDUSTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Girl Scouts of Western Ohio ↗
- Who funds THE ABILITY CENTER OF GREATER TOLEDO ↗
- Who funds Open Door Ministry Inc ↗
- Who funds PERRYSBURG HEIGHTS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds TOLEDO CULTURAL ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MAUMEE VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds THE VICTORY CENTER ↗
- Who funds TOLEDO SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
- Who funds ERIE SHORES COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds SO ALL MAY EAT INC ↗
- Who funds MEMORYLANE CARE SERVICES ↗
- Who funds TOLEDO SCIENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds TOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE COCOON SHELTER ↗
- Who funds Compassion Health Toledo ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds TOLEDO REPERTOIRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds THE TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WOOD COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Toledo ↗
- Who funds TOLEDO MUSLIM DOCTORS INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds SUNSHINE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF OTTAWA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE ↗
- Who funds THOMAS M WERNERT CENTER ↗
- Who funds WOOD COUNTY CHILDREN'S SERVICES ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF LUCAS COUNTY CHILDREN SERVICES ↗
- Who funds BITTERSWEET INC ↗
- Who funds PREFERRED PROPERTIES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Toledo Community Foundation Inc · The O-I Charities Foundation · John Henry Eldred Jr Foundation · United Way of Greater Toledo · The Stranahan Supporting Organization · Robert C and Susan M Savage Family Foundation · Dana Charitable Foundation · Bon Secours Mercy Health Foundation · Toledo Classic Inc · The Oswald Supporting Organization · Andersons Foundation · Stranahan Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Andersons Fund Supporting Organization funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Cal Ripken Sr Foundation Inc — 12% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Andersons Fund Supporting Organization?
Find your warmest path to The Andersons Fund Supporting Organization through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.