· Private foundation
Morris and Alma Schapiro Fund
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k26 grants · $660k
- $50k–250k45 grants · $3.8M
- $250k+8 grants · $3.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BROWN UNIVERSITY | $700,000 |
| MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER | $550,000 |
| BROOKLYN CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC | $500,000 |
| PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION | $400,000 |
| MONTEFIEORE MEDICAL CENTER | $366,667 |
| NEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN | $350,000 |
| BROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY | $255,000 |
| CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE | $250,000 |
| NEW YORK UNIVERSITY | $200,000 |
| THIRD STREET MUSIC SCHOOL SETTLEMENT | $200,000 |
| CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION | $170,000 |
| KAUFMAN MUSIC CENTER | $166,667 |
| HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY | $150,000 |
| BROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN | $150,000 |
| FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY | $150,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $813k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
97 repeat relationships — 68 still active in FY2024, 29 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $305k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MMMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER5× · 2020–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +36%
NEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC5× · 2020–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +15%
CITY HARVEST INC5× · 2020–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +3%
Funded once
- HFHOSPITAL FOR SPECIALone grant, 2021 · $250k
- NLNYU LANGONE HOSPITALSgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue +43%
- SOSOCIETY OF THE THIRDone grant, 2021 · $150k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Manhattan school of music is deeply committed to excellence in education, performance, and creative activity; to the humanity of the school's environment; and to the cultural enrichment of the larger community. a premiere international…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…
The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."
"citizens of culture and courage"committed to bilingual french and american education of the highest standard, our mission is to prepare students of many origins to be thinkers, innovators and leaders, at home in the world. we inspire and…
The masters school celebrates active participation, deep understanding, and meaningful connection. a community of diverse individuals, we gather to learn, to strive, to dare, to do - to be a power for good in the world.
The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).
Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship
New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…
The new york academy of art is a unique graduate school that combines intensive technical training in the fine arts with active critical discourse. we believe that rigorously trained artists are best able to realize their artistic vision.…
The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.
Bard college seeks to provide a challenging academic program and a supportive environment that fosters a collaborative interchange of ideas in the classroom as well as ambition to achieve excellence.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation and the most unlike its peers is Louis Armstrong Educational Foundat. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
113 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 113 of the 164 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds NEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds ELAINE KAUFMAN CULTURAL CENTER LUCY MOSES SCHOOL FOR MUSIC AND DANCE ↗
- Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds THE BROOKLYN QUEENS CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds THE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF THE THIRD STREET MUSIC SCHOOL SETTLEMENT ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GRAND CENTRAL ATELIER INC ↗
- Who funds THE DOOR - A CENTER OF ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds Opening Act Inc ↗
- Who funds WELLNESS IN THE SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds CHESS-IN-THE-SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
- Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOMINGDALE SCHOOL OF MUSIC ↗
- Who funds COOKE SCHOOL AND INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds WAVE HILL INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC ↗
- Who funds Solar Cookers International ↗
- Who funds STREETSQUASH INC ↗
- Who funds RIVENDELL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE CORPORATION OF YADDO ↗
- Who funds SAFE HANDS FOR GIRLS INC ↗
- Who funds GAY MEN'S HEALTH CRISIS INC ↗
- Who funds MANHATTAN COUNTRY SCHOOL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The New York Community Trust · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Ford Foundation · Pinkerton Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Mrs Giles Whiting Foundation · Booth Ferris Foundation Xxxxx4008 · The Achelis & Bodman Foundation Co Manice & Budd LLP · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · S&P Global Foundation Fka the McGraw-Hill Research Foundation · The Howard Gilman Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Morris and Alma Schapiro Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Berkshire Hills Music Academy Inc — 63% of income from government
- Project Music Heals Us Inc — 2% of income from government
- Merrimack College — 1% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Morris and Alma Schapiro Fund?
Find your warmest path to Morris and Alma Schapiro Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.