Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Clark Charitable Foundation Xxxxx2003

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$310k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Arts & Culture$800kHuman Services$410kHousing & Shelter$162kEducation$135kHealth$125kInternational$25k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $285k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW YORK LANDMARKS CONSERVANCY INC$100,000
VERTEX PARTNERSHIP ACADEMIES INC$85,000
MAMA FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC$50,000
BRONXWORKS INC$50,000
PRESCOTT AREA SHELTER SERVICES INC$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $410k) land where the poverty rate runs at 25%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%BRONXWORKS INC: $60k → 28%BRONXWORKS INC: $50k → 28%BRONXWORKS INC: $50k → 28%BRONXWORKS INC: $50k → 28%Lenox Hill Neighborhood House Inc: $50k → 17%BRONXWORKS INC: $50k → 28%BRONXWORKS INC: $50k → 28%Lenox Hill Neighborhood House Inc: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 8 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
2

Total granted

$1.6M
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+177%

Still filing today

88%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureInternationalEducationHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NY
    NEW YORK LANDMARKS CONSERVANCY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $580k · revenue +33%
  • BRONXWORKS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $310k · revenue +57%
  • US
    UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT SOCIETY OF NEW YORK
    3× · 2020–2023 · $105k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • SAKHI FOR SOUTH ASIAN SURVIVORS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +177%
  • RA
    RECESS ACTIVITIES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue -32%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lsny-Bronx Corporation

Legal services nyc-bronx is a not-for-profit corporation organized for the purposes of providing legal assistance to indigent persons in the new york city area in noncriminal proceedings or matters.

Education
2
The Bronx Parent Housing Network Inc

Bronx parent housing network is committed to making a difference in solving the housing problem in new york city by transforming lives and creating holistic paths to employment so that individuals and families can secure safe, clean,…

Human Services
3
Manhattan Legal Services

Manhattan legal services is a not-for-profit corporation organized for the purpose of providing legal assistance to indigent persons in the new york area in noncriminal proceedings or matters.

Crime & Legal
4
Legal Services Nyc

Legal services nyc is a non-profit organization that provides free civil legal assistance to low-income people in new york city. a community-based organization serving more than 100,000 people annually, lsnyc is the nation's largest…

Crime & Legal
5
Housing Partnership Development Corporation

Housing partnership development corporation functions to provide available low and moderate cost housing in the new york metro area through new housing production, preservation, rehabilitation, as well as the revitalization and…

Housing & Shelter
6
Brooklyn Legal Services Inc

Brooklyn legal services, inc is a not-for-profit corporation organized for the purpose of providing legal assistance to indigent persons in the new york city area in noncriminal proceedings or matters.

Crime & Legal
7
James Lenox House Association Inc

James lenox house association ("association") provides housing and quality supportive services to older adults in two residences on manhattan's upper east side: james lenox house and carnegie east house. the association shares common board…

Human Services
8
New York City Charter School of the Arts

New york city charter school of the arts (the "school") inspires a diverse community of young people to engage with the arts as a pathway to rich and rigorous academic scholarship and a creative, purposeful life.

Education
9
Acacia Network Housing Inc

Provides temporary housing and housing assistance to homeless families and singles in new york city; provides ancillary social services, food, clothing, access to medical services and finds permanent housing and jobs to those families.

Housing & Shelter
10
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
11
Neighborhood Housing Services of Rochester Inc

NeighborWorks Rochester collaborates with people and partners to strengthen, sustain and promote city neighborhoods. Our services are available to a wide spectrum of the community, including existing and potential homeowners, tenants and…

Housing & Shelter
12
The Bronx Council On the Arts Incorporated

A pioneering advocate for cultural equity, the bronx council on the arts nurtures the development of diverse artists and arts organizations and build strong cultural connections in and beyond the bronx.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University Settlement Society of New York and the most unlike its peers is Bronxworks Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NEW YORK LANDMARKS CONSERVANCY INC — $580,000 · OtherNEW YORK LANDMARKS CONSERVANCY INCBACK ON MY FEET NYC — $125,000 · OtherBACK ON MY FEET NYCUNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT SOCIETY OF NEW YORK — $105,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT SOCIETY OF NEW YORKBRONXWORKS INC — $310,000 · Human ServicesBRONXWORKS INCLENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesLENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUS…MAMA FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC — $200,000 · Arts & CultureMAMA FOUNDATION…RECESS ACTIVITIES INC — $20,000 · Arts & CultureRECESS ACTIVITI…VERTEX PARTNERSHIP ACADEMIES INC — $135,000 · EducationVERTEX PA…Prescott Area Shelter Services Inc — $57,000 · Housing & ShelterSAKHI FOR SOUTH ASIAN SURVIVORS INC — $25,000 · International
Other$810,000Human Services$410,000Arts & Culture$220,000Education$135,000Housing & Shelter$57,000International$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEW YORK LANDMARKS CONSERVANCY INC — $580,000 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetBRONXWORKS INC — $310,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMAMA FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC — $200,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetVERTEX PARTNERSHIP ACADEMIES INC — $135,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT SOCIETY OF NEW YORK — $105,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPrescott Area Shelter Services Inc — $57,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetSAKHI FOR SOUTH ASIAN SURVIVORS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetRECESS ACTIVITIES INC — $20,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Clark Charitable Foundation Xxxxx2003 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph