Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Drexel University

DREXEL UNIVERSITY fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems.

$445M
Granted FY2025still arriving
120
Grants FY2025still arriving
30
States reached
$2.2M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Science & Tech$68MEducation$44MHealth$28MYouth Development$3.8MHuman Services$2.1MCommunity Improvement$2.1MFood & Nutrition$772kArts & Culture$702kOther$0
02FY2025 · 120 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 120 grants below total $16,913,840 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $444,710,365 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $427,796,525 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k46 grants · $1.1M
  • $50k–250k53 grants · $6.5M
  • $250k+14 grants · $9.3M
$64,167
Median grant
30
States reached
$2.9B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$2,208,816
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY$1,135,347
RICE UNIVERSITY$1,013,466
MATHEMATICA INC$659,903
SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY$630,779
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$560,532
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY$529,122
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA$478,307
REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS$426,196
UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO$421,343
THE PHILADELPHIA AIDS CONSORTIUM$348,884
LINCOLN UNIVERSITY$306,181
REGENTS OF THE UNIV OF MICHIGAN$305,957
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS$291,810
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES$244,922
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $3.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NEPA CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $7k → 13%NATIONAL BLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE: $37k → 8%NATIONAL BLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE: $27k → 8%BETHANNA: $40k → 6%BETHANNA: $20k → 6%CHILD AND FAMILY FOCUS INC: $19k → 7%RESOURCES FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INC: $7k → 10%EMPOWERED CDC INC: $25k → 22%EMPOWERED CDC INC: $25k → 22%BCDI - PHILADELPHIA & VICINITY: $20k → 22%BCDI - PHILADELPHIA & VICINITY: $20k → 22%BCDI - PHILADELPHIA & VICINITY: $20k → 22%THE VILLAGE OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES: $15k → 22%SEAMAAC: $30k → 22%SEAMAAC: $25k → 22%MOTHERS IN CHARGE: $166k → 22%MOTHERS IN CHARGE: $10k → 22%CLARIFI: $629k → 22%FIRST UP: $300k → 22%FIRST UP: $237k → 22%FIRST UP: $200k → 22%FIRST UP: $181k → 22%FIRST UP: $168k → 22%FIRST UP: $100k → 22%PEOPLE'S EMERGENCY CENTER: $352k → 22%PEOPLE'S EMERGENCY CENTER: $262k → 22%PEOPLE'S EMERGENCY CENTER: $237k → 22%PEOPLE'S EMERGENCY CENTER: $140k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$125M · 209 repeat orgs$6.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

209 repeat relationships — 96 still active in FY2025, 113 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

209
109

Total granted

$125M
$5.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+20%

Still filing today

55%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementScience & TechYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education
    9× · 2017–2025 · $5.0M · revenue +5%
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $4.4M · revenue +64%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.7M · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • UO
    University Of Connecticut
    one grant, 2019 · $652k
  • CC
    CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING SERVICE OF DELAWARE VALLEY
    one grant, 2024 · $629k · revenue 0%
  • HP
    HEIGHTS PHILADELPHIA
    one grant, 2024 · $301k · revenue +20%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
2
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
5
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

—
8
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
9
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
10
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
11
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
12
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northeastern University and the most unlike its peers is Sequoia Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-12 SchoolsYouth Development ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Local Food System Organizat…Immigrant Worker SupportPregnancy Support ServicesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Environmental Conservation …Policy Research and AdvocacyChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Cancer Support ServicesPublic Library OperationsDevelopmental Disabilities …Food Banks and PantriesCommunity College Foundatio…Community FoundationsCommunity Arts CentersFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%42%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr16%10%20–35yr13%12%35–55yr16%71%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.9%3/339
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,226

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

195 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 195 of the 342 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
192/195
Grantees still filing
139/195
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY — $8,640,147 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEYUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS — $7,894,861 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVISTHE PHILADELPHIA SCHOOL — $2,757,707 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT — $2,715,152 · Other+106 more — $51,238,101 · Other+106 moreTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $12,493,181 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVAN…Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $4,988,337 · EducationTemple University - Of The Commonwealth …JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $4,356,258 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $3,263,812 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN T…Yale University — $2,865,953 · EducationYale UniversityCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $2,545,094 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $2,264,000 · EducationDELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY — $1,916,400 · Education+44 more — $17,847,979 · Education+44 moreChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $3,724,172 · HealthChildren's H…Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $2,775,919 · HealthDana-Farber …THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $2,518,683 · HealthTHE CHILDREN…GEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION — $1,027,766 · HealthGEORGIA TECH…KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS — $983,327 · HealthKAISER FOUND…THE WISTAR INSTITUTE OF ANATOMY AND BIOLOGY — $962,278 · HealthTHE WISTAR I…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $629,788 · Health+16 more — $3,100,976 · Health+16 moreFIRST UP — $1,186,072 · Human ServicesHOPEPHL — $990,233 · Human ServicesCONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING SERVICE OF DELAWARE VALLEY — $629,411 · Human ServicesMOTHERS IN CHARGE — $175,273 · Human Services+2 more — $123,840 · Human ServicesFAB YOUTH PHILADELPHIA — $844,574 · Youth DevelopmentPLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED — $348,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE PHILADELPHIA EDUCATION FUND — $248,736 · Youth DevelopmentGREATER PHILADELPHIA TOURISM MARKETING CORPORATION — $819,425 · Community ImprovementLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $292,358 · Community ImprovementUNIVERSITY CITY DISTRICT — $170,794 · Community ImprovementThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies — $868,050 · Science & TechResearch Triangle Institute — $192,548 · Science & TechUniversity of Kansas Center for Research Inc — $74,102 · Science & Tech
Other$73,245,968Education$52,541,014Health$15,722,909Human Services$3,104,829Youth Development$1,441,310Community Improvement$1,282,577Science & Tech$1,134,700

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $12,493,181 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $4,988,337 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $4,356,258 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $3,724,172 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $3,263,812 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetYale University — $2,865,953 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $2,775,919 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PHILADELPHIA SCHOOL — $2,757,707 over 5y, 9.4% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $2,545,094 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $2,518,683 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $2,264,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY — $1,916,400 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE — $1,557,124 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $1,387,690 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST UP — $1,186,072 over 6y, 5.9% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $1,152,090 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University — $1,150,945 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University — $1,123,167 over 7y, 0.0% of budget21ST CENTURY PARTNERSHIP FOR STEM EDUCATION — $1,054,860 over 7y, 6.2% of budgetGEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION — $1,027,766 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSUNRISE OF PHILADELPHIA — $1,019,171 over 4y, 7.5% of budgetWilliam Marsh Rice University — $1,013,466 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPEPHL — $990,233 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetKAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS — $983,327 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WISTAR INSTITUTE OF ANATOMY AND BIOLOGY — $962,278 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies — $868,050 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PHILADELPHIA AIDS CONSORTIUM DBA WORLD HEALTH CARE INFRASTRUCTURE — $853,260 over 5y, 20% of budgetFAB YOUTH PHILADELPHIA — $844,574 over 2y, 35% of budgetGREATER PHILADELPHIA TOURISM MARKETING CORPORATION — $819,425 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $678,121 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN UNIVERSITY — $649,602 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $629,788 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING SERVICE OF DELAWARE VALLEY — $629,411 over 1y, 10% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $602,456 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA ACADEMIES INC — $596,500 over 5y, 5.9% of budgetARTISTYEAR — $594,999 over 5y, 19% of budgetThe George Washington University — $545,089 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University — $540,640 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREENER PARTNERS — $501,968 over 5y, 14% of budgetEDISON WELDING INSTITUTE — $499,825 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetJEFFERSON HEALTH CORPORATION F/K/A ALBERT EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK — $469,603 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSTEPPINGSTONE SCHOLARS INC — $456,900 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetTNTP INC — $448,228 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology — $415,795 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPublic Health Management Corporation — $410,100 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $399,893 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $388,238 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $375,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds Yale University ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE PHILADELPHIA SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
  • Who funds DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds FIRST UP ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds 21ST CENTURY PARTNERSHIP FOR STEM EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds SUNRISE OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds William Marsh Rice University ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia Foun…The William Penn Foun…University of Pittsbu…The Trustees of Colum…United Way of Greater…Philadelphia Works IncVanderbilt University…The Pew Charitable Tr…American Chemical Soc…Johns Hopkins Univers…Temple University - O…Cornell University
The Philadelphia FoundationPA66.5× affinity51 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · University of Pittsburgh · The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Philadelphia Works Inc · Vanderbilt University Medical Center · The Pew Charitable Trusts · American Chemical Society · Johns Hopkins University · Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education · Cornell University

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Drexel University funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • University of Delaware — 30% of income from government
  • Delaware State University — 18% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Yale University — 12% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc — 6% of income from government
  • University of Miami — 5% of income from government
  • Institute for Healthcare Improvement — 0% of income from government
  • The Cooper Health System a New Jersey Non-Profit Corporation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
25report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 342 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines