· Public charity
American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry Inc
Promote high quality evidence-based screening, assessment and treatment for substance use disorders and co-occurring mental disorders.translate and disseminate evidence-based research to clinical practice and public policy.strengthen addiction psychiatry specialty training and foster careers in addiction psychiatry.provide evidence-based…
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 63% of AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ADDICTION PSYCHIATRY INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 60 grants below total $14,299,195 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $15,247,424 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $948,229 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $19k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $283k
- $50k–250k35 grants · $4.6M
- $250k+11 grants · $9.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ADDICTION TRANSFER TECHNOLOGY CENTER (ATTC) | $5,287,018 |
| RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE | $1,167,369 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION (AHA) | $486,097 |
| PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE | $480,193 |
| NASTAD | $300,819 |
| BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER | $287,950 |
| MOBILIZE RECOVERY | $283,000 |
| AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ACADEMY OF ADDICTION MEDICINE | $268,953 |
| COUNCIL ON SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION | $265,296 |
| COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY | $263,119 |
| NATIONAL HARM REDUCTION COALITION | $261,782 |
| UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON | $244,498 |
| NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR MENTAL WELLBEING | $230,236 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LA | $225,336 |
| AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC NURSES ASSOCIATION (APNA) | $218,044 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $253k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
50 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.9M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RFRESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $3.5M · revenue +70%
- AOAMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ACADEMY OF ADDICTION MEDICINE9× · 2017–2025 · $2.4M · revenue +95% · 74% of their budget
- RTResearch Triangle Institute8× · 2018–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +45%
Funded once
- MGMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDone grant, 2021 · $324k
- GHGENERAL HOSPITAL CORP MASSACHUSETTS RESEARCH RECOVERY INSTITUTEone grant, 2023 · $227k
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $208k · revenue -21%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Advancing medicine through excellence in the science, education and professional practice of medical physics. the mission is carried out through driving scientific and clinical innovation in medical physics to improve human health,…
Aacom leads and advocates for the osteopathic medical education community to improve the health of the public. aacom represents and advances the continuum of medical education by: supporting our member institutions as they educate the…
Advance pharmacy education, research, scholarship, practice and service, in partnership with members and stakeholders, to improve health for all.
The mission of pharmacists is to help people achieve optimal health outcomes. ashp helps its members achieve this mission by advocating and supporting the professional practice of pharmacists in hospitals, health systems, ambulatory care…
To ensure the professional growth, personal excellence, and recognition of physician associates, and to support efforts to enable them to improve the quality, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness of patient-centered health care.
The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.
Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.
The american college of radiology (acr) is organized to advance radiology science, practice and access, improve quality and safety, provide continuing education for radiology and allied professionals, and achieve better outcomes through…
The society is a multidisciplinary professional medical organization dedicated to improving human health by advancing nuclear medicine, molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy.
Aascu is a washington, d.c. based higher education association that represents the sector of over 500 regional public colleges, universities, and systems whose members share a learning and teaching centered culture, a commitment to…
American psychological association is a national membership organization created to promote the advancement, communication, and application of psychological science and knowledge to benefit society and improve lives. apa fulfills these…
The american osteopathic association (aoa) is a membership association representing more than 168,000 osteopathic physicians (do) and osteopathic medical students. as the primary certifying body for do and the accrediting agency for all…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Partnership to End Addiction and the most unlike its peers is Partnership for a Drug-Free America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
58 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 58 of the 99 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ACADEMY OF ADDICTION MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds Research Triangle Institute ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds CADCA ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN COLLEGE OF EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS ↗
- Who funds BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
- Who funds AMERSA INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds Yale University ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR HIV EDUCATION AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ADDICTION MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds PA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS ↗
- Who funds CICATELLI ASSOCIATES INC ↗
- Who funds POLICE ASSISTED ADDICTION AND RECOVERY INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS ↗
- Who funds FACES & VOICES OF RECOVERY ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR STATE COURTS ↗
- Who funds Public Health Institute ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE ALCOHOL AND DRUG AGENCY DIRECTORS INC ↗
- Who funds MOBILIZE RECOVERY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC NURSES ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST PORTLAND AREA INDIAN HEALTH BOARD ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF OPIOID DEPENDENCE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE OF STATE AND TERRITORIAL AIDS DIRECTORSDBA NASTAD ↗
- Who funds THE NATIONAL JUDICIAL COLLEGE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Conrad N Hilton Foundation · Yale University · The Commonwealth Fund · The Pew Charitable Trusts · Sozosei Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Northwest Portland Area Indian Health Board — 70% of income from government
- Fenway Community Health Center Inc — 27% of income from government
- Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
- Police Assisted Addiction and Recovery Initiative Inc — 16% of income from government
- National Association of Community Health Centers Inc — 12% of income from government
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- American Society of Addiction Medicine — 9% of income from government
- Rutgers University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry Inc?
Find your warmest path to American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.