Skip to content

Nevada · Public charity

National Council of Juvenile & Family Court Judges

Charitable and educational purposes include: a.) improving the standards, practices, and effectiveness of courts exercising jurisdiction over families and children; b) informing or assisting those who deal with or affect these courts; c) educating persons connected with these courts and other interested members of the public in…

$377k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
9
Grants FY2024
9
Organizations funded FY2023
22%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$21,806
Largest grant, FY2024
$125,354
Organizations funded a year
8 to 11
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
7
Total assets, FY2024
$5.8M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 22% of the organizations National Council of Juvenile & Family Court Judges funded were first-time grantees, receiving 22% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $76k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Crime & LegalEducationPublic BenefitCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving9$373k22%
FY20239$339k22%
FY202210$231k30%
FY20218$367k13%
FY202010$243k20%
FY20198$354k25%
FY201811$373k9%
FY201711$789kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Crime & Legal$2.6MPublic Benefit$143kCivil Rights$125kHealth$85kHuman Services$65kYouth Development$17kEducation$10k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
MN
NY
OR
CT
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
DC

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Fund for the City of New York Inc$514,94070%
Futures Without Violence$510,84382%
Domestic Abuse Intervention Programs$300,27879%
American Bar Association Fund for Justice and Education$223,31570%
Npc Research$164,9457n/a
Policy Research Associates Inc$151,6182n/a
Center for the Study of Social Policy$142,95831%
International Association of Chiefs of Police$133,27120%
University of Connecticut$125,3541n/a
Justice Innovation Inc$104,01630%
Show all 24 grantees
All grantees of National Council of Juvenile & Family Court Judges by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Fund for the City of New York Inc$514,94070%
Futures Without Violence$510,84382%
Domestic Abuse Intervention Programs$300,27879%
American Bar Association Fund for Justice and Education$223,31570%
Npc Research$164,9457n/a
Policy Research Associates Inc$151,6182n/a
Center for the Study of Social Policy$142,95831%
International Association of Chiefs of Police$133,27120%
University of Connecticut$125,3541n/a
Justice Innovation Inc$104,01630%
Legal Resource Center on Violence Against Women Inc$101,5854n/a
National Organization for Victim Advocacy Inc$101,57721%
Portland State University$75,0182n/a
Association of Prosecuting Attorneys Inc$68,16312%
Aequitas$56,28731%
District of Columbia Coalition Against Domestic$50,85621%
Vera Institute of Justice Inc$50,04520%
National American Indian Court Judges Association$49,93424%
Council of State Governments$39,13522%
American University$35,00030%
Ujima Inc$26,0832n/a
Regents of the University of California$23,1311n/a
Break the Cycle$12,84421%
Inspire Action for Social Change Inc$6,00911%

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget National Council of Juvenile & Family Court Judges supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFund for the City of New York Inc: $514,940 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetFutures Without Violence: $510,843 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetDomestic Abuse Intervention Programs: $300,278 over 7y, 9.0% of budgetAmerican Bar Association Fund for Justice and Education: $223,315 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCenter for the Study of Social Policy: $142,958 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetInternational Association of Chiefs of Police: $133,271 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetJustice Innovation Inc: $104,016 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNational Organization for Victim Advocacy Inc: $101,577 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetAssociation of Prosecuting Attorneys Inc: $68,163 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetAequitas: $56,287 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetDistrict of Columbia Coalition Against Domestic: $50,856 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetVera Institute of Justice Inc: $50,045 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNational American Indian Court Judges Association: $49,934 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetCouncil of State Governments: $39,135 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetAmerican University: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBreak the Cycle: $12,844 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetInspire Action for Social Change Inc: $6,009 over 1y, 1.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 17.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John D and Catherine T Macarthur FoundationIL14.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Laura and John Arnold Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare National Council of Juvenile & Family Court Judges with peer funders

About National Council of Juvenile & Family Court Judges

How much does National Council of Juvenile & Family Court Judges give?
National Council of Juvenile & Family Court Judges reported 9 grants totaling $376,615 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 8 and 11 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does National Council of Juvenile & Family Court Judges fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Crime & Legal (86%), Public Benefit (5%), Civil Rights (4%).
Who are National Council of Juvenile & Family Court Judges's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Fund for the City of New York Inc ($515k), Futures Without Violence ($511k), Domestic Abuse Intervention Programs ($300k).
Does National Council of Juvenile & Family Court Judges fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 22% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as National Council of Juvenile & Family Court Judges?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation, Laura and John Arnold Foundation, Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program.
Where is National Council of Juvenile & Family Court Judges based?
National Council of Juvenile & Family Court Judges is based in NV.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on National Council of Juvenile & Family Court Judges’ filings →

More from the funding graph