Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Bill Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation

The foundation is a nonpartisan organization founded by president bill clinton.

$2.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$1.9M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Youth Development$6.0MEducation$5.7MPublic Safety & Disaster$265kInternational$248kHuman Services$174kCommunity Improvement$84kPhilanthropy$75kArts & Culture$53kRecreation & Sports$26kOther$1.2M
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 20 grants below total $2,343,170 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,758,969 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $415,799 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k18 grants · $263k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $205k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.9M
$15,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$317M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS CLINTON SCHOOL OF PUBLIC SERVICE$1,875,000
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY$205,170
TREE HOUSE BOOKS$28,000
UNITED WAY OF WYOMING VALLEY$15,000
UNITED WAY OF BUCKS COUNTRY$15,000
THE LEARNING LAMP INC$15,000
UNITED WAY OF VENANGO TITUSVILLE$15,000
UNITED WAY OF CAPITAL REGION$15,000
UNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN ALLEGHENIES$15,000
READING IS FUNDAMENTAL PITTSBURGH$15,000
CASA SAN JOSE$15,000
RXALL INC$15,000
MACEDONIA FAMILY AND COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER$15,000
MAE HEALTH$15,000
HOMELESS CHILDREN'S EDUCATION FUND$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $174k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CASA SAN JOSE: $15k → 11%KEYSTONE SERVICE SYSTEMS INC: $10k → 12%EVERYBODY READY INC: $103k → 21%LAUNDRY CARES FOUNDATION: $27k → 7%LAUNDRY CARES FOUNDATION: $13k → 7%LAUNDRY CARES FOUNDATION: $6k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IN
PA
NJ
CA
CO
AR
DC
TX

Grants abroad, by region — $310k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$280k · 90% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Middle East and North Africa$15k · 5% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Sub-Saharan Africa$15k · 5% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$11M · 11 repeat orgs$3.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +98% since the first grant, against +35% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
25

Total granted

$11M
$2.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+98%
+35%

Still filing today

91%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $418k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyInternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3.1M · revenue +98%
  • NC
    National Collegiate Inventors & Innovators Alliance Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $1.1M · revenue +132%
  • Rocky Mountain Institute
    3× · 2019–2022 · $384k · revenue +227%

Funded once

  • TG
    THE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $1.1M · revenue -15%
  • TM
    THE MILLER CENTER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $446k · revenue -12%
  • CC
    CORE COMMUNITY ORGANIZED RELIEF EFFORTgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $265k · revenue +381%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
2
Philadelphia Industrial Development Corporation

Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.

Community Improvement
3
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
4
Pennsylvania Academic Library Consortium Inc

To support education and research at college, university, and research libraries.

Education
5
Pittsburgh Council On Higher Education

To provide a means for sharing resources and information among members, engage in joint projects, and offer a common voice on educational matters.

Education
6
Children First Pa

Summary

Human Services
7
Community Action Commission

Commmunity action commission's mission is to build on the strengths and resources available, provide solutions, for complex issues, and empower individuals, families, and communities to move out of poverty.

Human Services
8
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
9
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
10
Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.

Employment
11
United Way Worldwide

To improve lives by mobilizing caring power of communities around the world to advance common good.

Philanthropy
12
Foundations Inc

Foundations is dedicated to improving the quality of education for our nation's most vulnerable children by strengthening the skills of educators through professional learning. foundations, inc. is a not-for-profit educational service…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Wyoming Valley and the most unlike its peers is Construction for Change. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsCommunity College Foundatio…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…United Way AffiliatesElementary Literacy TutoringPublic Library OperationsChristian Missionary Organi…Immigrant Worker SupportSchool District Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%56%10–20yr16%11%20–35yr13%9%35–55yr16%24%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/51
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,514

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/44
Grantees still filing
29/44
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ALLIANCE FOR A HEALTHIER GENERATION INC — $5,984,196 · Youth DevelopmentALLIANCE FOR A HEALTHIER GENERATION INC+1 more — $26,600 · Youth DevelopmentUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC — $3,120,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INCTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION — $1,149,991 · EducationTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATIONNational Collegiate Inventors & Innovators Alliance Inc — $1,060,000 · EducationNational Collegiate Inventors & Innovators All…GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $205,170 · Education+6 more — $132,800 · EducationTHE MILLER CENTER FOUNDATION — $446,056 · OtherTHE MILLER…Rocky Mountain Institute — $383,750 · OtherRocky Moun…CITY YEAR INC — $60,000 · OtherHISPANIC FEDERATION INC — $50,000 · Other+24 more — $397,133 · Other+24 moreCORE COMMUNITY ORGANIZED RELIEF EFFORT — $264,855 · Public Safety & DisasterCONSTRUCTION FOR CHANGE — $175,000 · InternationalCLEAN THE WORLD FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 · InternationalVITAL VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INC — $30,000 · InternationalHAITIAN EDUCATION AND LEADERSHIP PROGRAM — $8,308 · InternationalEverybody Ready Inc — $102,764 · Human ServicesLAUNDRYCARES FOUNDATION — $46,000 · Human ServicesCASA SAN JOSE — $15,000 · Human ServicesKEYSTONE SERVICE SYSTEMS INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesLAUNCH INC — $52,000 · Community ImprovementMACEDONIA FAMILY AND COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC — $31,600 · Community Improvement
Youth Development$6,010,796Education$5,667,961Other$1,336,939Public Safety & Disaster$264,855International$248,308Human Services$173,764Community Improvement$83,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetALLIANCE FOR A HEALTHIER GENERATION INC — $5,984,196 over 6y, 15% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC — $3,120,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION — $1,149,991 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetNational Collegiate Inventors & Innovators Alliance Inc — $1,060,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetTHE MILLER CENTER FOUNDATION — $446,056 over 1y, 12% of budgetRocky Mountain Institute — $383,750 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCORE COMMUNITY ORGANIZED RELIEF EFFORT — $264,855 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $205,170 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONSTRUCTION FOR CHANGE — $175,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetEverybody Ready Inc — $102,764 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetCITY YEAR INC — $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLAUNDRYCARES FOUNDATION — $46,000 over 3y, 8.3% of budgetCLEAN THE WORLD FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMACEDONIA FAMILY AND COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC — $31,600 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE LEARNING LAMP INC — $31,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVITAL VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTREE HOUSE BOOKS — $28,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD NORTH MUSEUM OF PLAY — $26,600 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetReading Ready Pittsburgh — $26,600 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetKABOOM INC — $25,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JUVENILE & FAMILY COURT JUDGES — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHICAGO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHEALTHY START INC — $16,600 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWQED MULTIMEDIA — $16,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLITERACY PITTSBURGH — $16,600 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTH HILLS INTERFAITH MINISTRIES — $16,600 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMillvale Community Library — $16,600 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF VENANGO COUNTY AND TITUSVILLE REGION — $15,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF BUCKS COUNTY — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WYOMING VALLEY — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOMELESS CHILDREN'S EDUCATION FUND — $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE SOUTHERN ALLEGHENIES INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLYCOMING COUNTY UNITED WAY INC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL PITTSBURGH — $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE PATERSON EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE CAPITAL REGION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCASA SAN JOSE — $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetKEYSTONE SERVICE SYSTEMS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITIES SOUTHEAST PHILADELPHIA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPENNON ORGANIZATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHAITIAN EDUCATION AND LEADERSHIP PROGRAM — $8,308 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetURBAN AFFAIRS COALITION — $5,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Grable FoundationThe United Way of Sou…The Heinz EndowmentsThe Pittsburgh Founda…Hillman Family Founda…The Jack Buncher Foun…Highmark FoundationCitizens Charitable F…Richard King Mellon F…The Cigna Group Found…Ppl FoundationFirstenergy Foundation
The Grable FoundationPA27.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Grable Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · The Heinz Endowments · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · The Jack Buncher Foundation · Highmark Foundation · Citizens Charitable Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · The Cigna Group Foundation · Ppl Foundation · Firstenergy Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bill Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • National Collegiate Inventors & Innovators Alliance Inc — 38% of income from government
  • City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Clean the World Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines