Loading…
Loading…
Kentucky · Nonprofit
METHODIST HOME OF KENTUCKY INC (Kentucky) is funded by 24 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $1,847,240 in grants to it, the largest being K JOSH MIZE AND WYNONA OWEN MIZE CHARITABLE ($652,414). 18 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
METHODIST HOME OF KENTUCKY INC runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 2,461 human services nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,461 human services nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
Government-grant reliance: 2024 65%. Grants only — government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
92% of METHODIST HOME OF KENTUCKY INC’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (21% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
$74k from 2 funders in 2025, up from $118k and 5 in 2017.
12 of 24 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 43% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of METHODIST HOME OF KENTUCKY INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
METHODIST HOME OF KENTUCKY INC has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 35% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 58% · 2018 41% · 2019 45% · 2020 33% · 2021 32% · 2022 22% · 2023 28% · 2024 29% · 2025 93% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
50% of METHODIST HOME OF KENTUCKY INC's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 75% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
METHODIST HOME OF KENTUCKY INC draws 71% of its grant income from funders outside Kentucky — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 14 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 24 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
83% of spending goes to programs.
Operates in 1 state
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 24funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing