Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jw Kinzer Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$84k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$1.7MArts & Culture$190kHousing & Shelter$30kHealth$19kRecreation & Sports$10kReligion$6kCommunity Improvement$1kHuman Services$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $4k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$80,000
FLOYD COUNTY HOMELESS SHELTER$2,500
WYMT MOUNTAIN CLASSIC SCHOLARSHIP FUND$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 20%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 20%THE KENTUCKY UNITED METHODIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN & YOUTH: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 9 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
10

Total granted

$1.9M
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+32%

Still filing today

22%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WESLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.7M
  • MA
    MOUNTAIN ARTS CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $150k
  • JW
    JENNY WILEY DRAMA ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $40k

Funded once

  • TW
    THE WILL KINZER FOUNDATION FOR AUTISM RESEARCH INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -100% · 50% of their budget
  • PM
    PIKEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +32%
  • CU
    CHRIST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kentucky Documentary Photographic Project Inc

Kdpp is an ongoing visual history of kentucky.

Arts & Culture
2
Jackson County Cancer Fund

Provide medical supplies for cancer patients

Health
3
Pikeville Community Kitchen Inc

To provide meals to low income people

Food & Nutrition
4
Pike County Hands of Hope

PlacementofHomelessindividualsandFamiliesinHotels&Motels

Human Services
5
Mission Frankfort Clinic Inc

Provide medical,dental,pharmaceutical services to the uninsured and under-insured.

Health
6
Pickens County Hospital Foundation Inc

To raise funds for pickens cnty med ctr

7
Faith Mountain Mission of Kentucky Inc
Youth Development
8
Pike Medical Foundation

To provide financial support to a community owned hospital

9
The Place Jackson

Other Assets - furniture and household equipment Other Liabilities - payroll taxes payable

10
House of Blessings Inc

Ministry

Food & Nutrition
11
Jackson Downtown Development Corporation

Downtown economic and community development in the city of jackson, tn

12
Big Sandy Mountain Heritage-History Center Incorporated

The mission of the Big Sandy Heritage Center Museum, Inc. is to collect and preserve the history of Pike County and the Big Sandy region in order to engage and educate our community and visitors to the people, places and events that make…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Methodist Home of Kentucky Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Will Kinzer Foundation for Autism Research Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WESLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $1,707,241 · OtherWESLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLMOUNTAIN ARTS CENTER — $150,000 · OtherMOUNTAIN ARTS CENTER+9 more — $26,230 · OtherJENNY WILEY DRAMA ASSOCIATION INC — $40,000 · Arts & CultureFLOYD COUNTY HOMELESS SHELTER INC — $30,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE WILL KINZER FOUNDATION FOR AUTISM RESEARCH INC — $10,000 · HealthPIKEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER INC — $5,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $2,000 · HealthHILLBILLY CHRISTMAS IN JULY — $1,000 · HealthPIKEVILLE MAIN STREET PROGRAM INC — $1,000 · Community ImprovementMETHODIST HOME OF KENTUCKY INC — $1,000 · Human Services
Other$1,883,471Arts & Culture$40,000Housing & Shelter$30,000Health$18,000Community Improvement$1,000Human Services$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFLOYD COUNTY HOMELESS SHELTER INC — $30,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetTHE WILL KINZER FOUNDATION FOR AUTISM RESEARCH INC — $10,000 over 1y, 50% of budgetPIKEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPIKEVILLE MAIN STREET PROGRAM INC — $1,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetMETHODIST HOME OF KENTUCKY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLBILLY CHRISTMAS IN JULY — $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JENNY WILEY DRAMA ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds FLOYD COUNTY HOMELESS SHELTER INC
  • Who funds THE WILL KINZER FOUNDATION FOR AUTISM RESEARCH INC
  • Who funds PIKEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER INC
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds PIKEVILLE MAIN STREET PROGRAM INC
  • Who funds METHODIST HOME OF KENTUCKY INC
  • Who funds HILLBILLY CHRISTMAS IN JULY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jw Kinzer Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jw Kinzer Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Jw Kinzer Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph