Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Board of Child Care of the United Methodist Church Inc

The board of child care's purpose is to enrich communities, one family at a time, its program span the mid-atlantic.

$25M
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$6.4M
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,660,491
Median grant
10
States reached
$110M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KENTUCKY UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME$6,376,446
CUNNINGHAM CHILDREN'S HOME$5,225,527
RESIDING HOPE$3,806,281
UMCH FAMILY SERVICE$2,246,947
UNITED METHODIST FAMILY SERVICES$1,660,491
MCHS FAMILY SERVICES$1,380,960
WELLROOT FAMILY SERVICES$1,141,078
UNITED METHODIST NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER$1,011,953
MERCY FIRST$995,898
PRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN$845,311
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $23.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MERCY FIRST: $996k → 6%RESIDING HOPE: $3.8M → 12%MCHS FAMILY SERVICES: $1.4M → 21%UNITED METHODIST NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $1.0M → 12%WELLROOT FAMILY SERVICES: $1.1M → 14%UMCH FAMILY SERVICE: $2.2M → 15%CUNNINGHAM CHILDREN'S HOME: $5.2M → 19%UNITED METHODIST FAMILY SERVICES: $1.7M → 9%KENTUCKY UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $6.4M → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
OH
KY
VA
TN
AL
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana United Methodist Children's Home Inc

To meet the special needs of each child and family served in order to help improve their quality of life. the board of trustees and staff members of the home are committed to bringing the highest quality resources available to the…

Human Services
2
United Methodist Ministry With Children and Families Inc

Methodist childrens homes seeks to bring restoration to children and youth who have been neglected or abused. by the end of their time with us, we hope to see that they find reconciliation with their biological families, love within an…

Human Services
3
United Methodist Children's Home

To provide quality compassionate behavioral healthcare services to children and families of arkansas through a comprehensive continuum of programs which include residential treatment center care, therapeutic group home care, emergency…

Human Services
4
United Methodist Children's Home

Serving abused, neglected and abandoned children through group homes and foster care; facilitating adoptions; and family preservation.

Human Services
5
Louisiana United Methodist Children & Family Services Inc

The organization seeks to provide the highest quality of care in ministry to the diverse needs of louisiana's children and families by offering a variety of holistic services which promote personal growth and wholesome family life. the…

Human Services
6
Methodist Children's Home

Methodist children's home equips children, youth, and families to flourish by offering hope through christian-centered relationships, services, and support.

Human Services
7
United Methodist Home for Children Inc

Provide a safe and caring program for youth that inspires hope for the future and stresses personal responsibility within an atmosphere of respect for everyone.

8
United Methodist Youth Home Inc

Operates Group Homes and Day Treatment Program for teens placed through the courts and licensed by the Indiana Department of Child Services.

Human Services
9
Calvary Children's Home

Our purpose is to provide a safe, loving, Christian environment for children needing long-term care who lack a stable home environment due to circumstances beyond their control. We are committed to equipping each child to build meaningful…

Human Services
10
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
11
House of Hope

Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.

12
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Methodist Children's Home and the most unlike its peers is Cunningham Childrens Home of Urbana Il. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

METHODIST HOME OF KENTUCKY INC — $6,376,446 · Human ServicesMETHODIST HOME OF KENTUCKY INCCUNNINGHAM CHILDRENS HOME OF URBANA IL — $5,225,527 · Human ServicesCUNNINGHAM CHILDRENS HOME OF URBANA ILFLORIDA UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME INC — $3,806,281 · Human ServicesFLORIDA UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME INCUNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME — $2,246,947 · Human ServicesUNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOMEUnited Methodist Family Services of Virginia — $1,660,491 · Human ServicesUnited Methodist Family Services of VirginiaMethodist Children's Home Society — $1,380,960 · Human ServicesMethodist Children's Home SocietyUNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME OF THE NORTH GA CONFERENCE INC — $1,141,078 · Human ServicesUNITED METHODIST NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS INC — $1,011,953 · Human ServicesMERCYFIRST — $995,898 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN — $845,311 · Other
Human Services$23,845,581Other$845,311

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCUNNINGHAM CHILDRENS HOME OF URBANA IL — $5,225,527 over 1y, 16% of budgetFLORIDA UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME INC — $3,806,281 over 1y, 14% of budgetUnited Methodist Family Services of Virginia — $1,660,491 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetUNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME OF THE NORTH GA CONFERENCE INC — $1,141,078 over 1y, 12% of budgetMERCYFIRST — $995,898 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN — $845,311 over 1y, 25% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL11.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Board of Child Care of the United Methodist Church Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph