How much did VNA FOUNDATION OF GREATER NORTH PENN grant in FY2025?

VNA FOUNDATION OF GREATER NORTH PENN reported 44 grants totaling $641,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing.

Where is VNA FOUNDATION OF GREATER NORTH PENN based?

VNA FOUNDATION OF GREATER NORTH PENN is based in PA.

VNA FOUNDATION OF GREATER NORTH PENN

Foundation Dossiers

· Private foundation

VNA FOUNDATION OF GREATER NORTH PENN

To enhance the health and well-being of residents in local communities by contributing to those organizations which have the capacity to strenthen the lives of individuals and families along a continuum of need, with the goal of building stronger and healthier communities for generations to come.

$641k

Granted FY2025

Grants

Communities

$140k

Largest

01What you fund

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 53% of VNA FOUNDATION OF GREATER NORTH PENN’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

seniorsupgrademanagementsafetyyouthamblerdomestic

2020

leadership trainingsystemcensus outreachcensus inclusiontechnologystrategiccircle

2021

programmingadultmontgomerylansdaletraininglivingway

2022

educationaltranslationinclusiondiversity trainingensuring equitableequitable accessmaterials

2023

racialcoloravailablepopulationensuring equitableequitable accesstranslation

2024

lgbtflexible programmingmontcotransportationmental carewellchild abuse

2025

boardcode blueblue shelterwellnessamblermentalprogramming

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k27 grants · $148k
$10k–50k13 grants · $186k
$50k–250k4 grants · $308k

$7,500

Median grant

States reached

$21M

Total assets

Largest grants

ABINGTON MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$140,000
MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION$62,500
MANNA ON MAIN STREET$55,000
BUCKS-MONT COLLABORATIVE$50,000
NORTH PENN VALLEY BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$40,000
MATTIE N DIXON COMMUNITY CUPBOARD$15,000
GARDEN OF HEALTH INC$14,500
KEYSTONE OPPORTUNITY CENTER$13,500
GENERATIONS OF INDIAN VALLEY$12,500
GREATER HARLEYSVILLE AND NORTH PENN SENIOR SERVICES$12,500
FAMILY PROMISE MONTCO$12,500
ACLAMO FAMILY CENTERS$12,500
BEAN BAG FOOD PROGRAM$11,000
LAUREL HOUSE$11,000
MISSION KIDS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$11,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $925k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8% — the area typically sits at 9%. 7% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$5.4M · 59 repeat orgs$670k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

59 repeat relationships — 41 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$5.4M

$519k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%

+14%

Still filing today

64%

56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $152k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BC
BUCKS-MONT COLLABORATIVE
8× · 2018–2025 · $332k · revenue +172% · 43% of their budget
MO
MANNA ON MAIN STREET
8× · 2018–2025 · $274k · revenue +197%
MC
MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION
8× · 2018–2025 · $216k · revenue +448%

Funded once

AH
ABINGTON-JEFFERSON HEALTH
one grant, 2018 · $150k · revenue +9%
AL
ADVANCED LIVING AND MANAGEMENT
one grant, 2021 · $35k
MO
MANNA ON MAIN STREET LEAD AGENCY
one grant, 2019 · $35k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Northeast Community Center for

Deliver mental health/intellectual disability services to the people of northeast philadelphia. the organization services approximately 1,854 clients.

Human Services

Penn Hills Library

A welcoming community center that provides information and equitable access to space, collections, materials, programs and services that enrich the quality of life and facilitate lifelong learning.

Education

Mount Nittany Health System

To provide management and administrative services to all mount nittany health subsidiaries.

Health

Hamilton Health Center Inc

To improve the health of central pa residents by delivering high quality health & social services.

Health

Main Line Adult Day Center

Main Line Adult Day Center provides day-time services to meet the needs of cognitively physically impaired adults. Services, provided in a safe, interactive supportive environment, include therapeutic recreational activities, nutrition…

—

Human Services Inc

Outpatient mental health, mental health residential, and homeless services.

Human Services

Advanced Living Community Development

Advanced living community development provides decent, quality housing that is affordable to low income and moderate income persons in montgomery county, pennsylvania.

Housing & Shelter

Montgomery Area Council On Aging

To provide services to the aging population

Human Services

Partnership for Community Supports

Providing supports coordination for individuals with intellectual disabilities and service coordination for infants and toddlers who have a developmental delay or are at risk of a delay.

Health

Action Wellness

Provide broad range of services to people in philadelphia infected and affected by the hiv disease and other chronic illnesses.

Health

Pennsylvania Mental Health

To promote and support recovery from mental illness through advocacy and education to eliminate stigma and discrimination. also, to provide a statewide structure of members and groups to assist in the improvement of the quality of life for…

—

Pennsylvania Health Care Association

Healthcare service programs

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Men's Christian Assoc North Penn and the most unlike its peers is Gwynedd Mercy University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/60

the rest of the field

10%

509/5,226

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

57 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

57/57

Grantees still filing

40/57

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$3,428,498Human Services$1,025,810Health$954,150Youth Development$212,350Housing & Shelter$203,100Education$162,915Crime & Legal$108,550

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia FoundationPA58.6× affinity31 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · Montgomery County Foundation Inc · Healthspark Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Genuardi Family Foundation · Penn Community Bank Foundation · W W Smith Charitable Trust · Eden Bridge Foundation · The Leo and Peggy Pierce Family · Foundations Community Partnership · The Cedarcrest Charitable Foundation Aka · Phillies Charities Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation VNA FOUNDATION OF GREATER NORTH PENN funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BUCKS-MONT COLLABORATIVE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~11 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.7× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 232463434 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on BUCKS-MONT COLLABORATIVE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 11 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 43% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Vna Foundation of Greater North Penn?

Find your warmest path to Vna Foundation of Greater North Penn through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

VNA FOUNDATION OF GREATER NORTH PENN

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

57 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Vna Foundation of Greater North Penn?

More from the funding graph

VNA FOUNDATION OF GREATER NORTH PENN

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

57 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Vna Foundation of Greater North Penn?

More from the funding graph