· Public charity
Philadelphia City Fund Inc
The Philadelphia City Fund serves as the fiscal sponsor for the City of Philadelphia and leverages public-private partnerships in collaboration with the City, the philanthropic community, and the residents of Philadelphia.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 94 grants below total $4,933,395 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $5,202,622 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $269,227 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $38k
- $10k–50k77 grants · $1.6M
- $50k–250k10 grants · $607k
- $250k+2 grants · $2.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| New Kensington Community Development Corporation | $2,162,375 |
| City Of Philadelphia - Vendor | $527,614 |
| Fund for the School District of Philadelphia | $90,301 |
| Norris Square Community Alliance (Xiente) | $84,400 |
| Blackhawks Athletic Club | $66,000 |
| Campaign for Working Families Inc | $65,000 |
| Greater Philadelphia YMCA | $50,500 |
| African Family Health OrganizationAFAHO | $50,450 |
| Growing Resilient Communities | $50,000 |
| Allies in Arts | $50,000 |
| Puentes de Salud | $50,000 |
| New Voices for Reproductive Freedom | $50,000 |
| Urban Affairs Coalition | $48,750 |
| PanPan | $45,889 |
| Center In The Park | $45,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
71 repeat relationships — 39 still active in FY2025, 32 since wound down; 53 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NKNew Kensington Community Development Corp2× · 2024–2025 · $3.8M · revenue +32%
- ISIMPACT SERVICES CORPORATION3× · 2018–2024 · $2.7M · revenue +85%
- CFCampaign for Working Families Inc7× · 2017–2025 · $703k · revenue +188%
Funded once
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CITY TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS INCone grant, 2018 · $210k · revenue -31%- PFPEOPLEFORBIKES FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · $209k · revenue -71%
- WNWhy Not Prosper Incgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $134k · revenue +26%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
) to lead and engage in campaigns that empower Black workers to advance our rights and improve job quality in key employment sectors
Mentoring and educational programs for female youth
Education, arts and culture.
Pcca's mission is to strengthen households and communities by developing and preserving homeownership and affordable housing, and educating consumers to increase accessability to economic opportunities.
Building support for the rights of working people through coalitions of labor and community and through public education.
To combat community deterioration and promote education.
Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.
Endangered Kind mission is to reduce gun violence using a community-driven approach that fosters trust to reach, restore, and sustain quality of life for high-risk youth and young adults ages 15-27 in the City of Philadelphia.
Improve the quality of life for the community and its residents.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Philadelphia Community Alliance and the most unlike its peers is Nextfab Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
174 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 174 of the 231 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds New Kensington Community Development Corp ↗
- Who funds IMPACT SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Campaign for Working Families Inc ↗
- Who funds HEALTH FEDERATION OF PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
- Who funds CONGRESO DE LATINOS UNIDOS INC ↗
- Who funds THE FUND FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds THE VILLAGE OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES ↗
- Who funds Beech Interplex Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CITY TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS INC ↗
- Who funds HACE ↗
- Who funds PEOPLEFORBIKES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CLAY STUDIO ↗
- Who funds CEIBA INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH PHILADELPHIA FINANCIAL PARTNERSHIP NEIGHBORHOOD PROGRESS FUND ↗
- Who funds Beech Community Services ↗
- Who funds Why Not Prosper Inc ↗
- Who funds MOVEMENT ALLIANCE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEAST ASIAN MUTUAL ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATIONS COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds Bicycle Coalition Of Greater Philadelphia ↗
- Who funds THE CAREER WARDROBE ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN FAMILY HEALTH ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds URBAN AFFAIRS COALITION ↗
- Who funds HOPEPHL ↗
- Who funds Greater Philadelphia Young Men's Christian Association ↗
- Who funds CAMBODIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR SOCIAL INCLUSION ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICANS UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds JOHN S AND JAMES L KNIGHT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN CULTURAL ALLIANCE OF NORTH AMERICA ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL MISSION SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds WELCOMING CENTER FOR NEW PENNSYLVANIANS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation · Independence Foundation · Scattergood Behavioral Health Foundation · Bread and Roses Community Fund · The Barra Foundation Inc · Henrietta Tower Wurts Memorial Foundation · Philanthropy Network Greater Philadelphia · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · The Alfred and Mary Douty Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Philadelphia City Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Teensharp — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.