Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Temple University - of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education

Providing access to high quality and affordable higher education, world-class research, and public service through its campuses and distance learning programs.

$281M
Granted FY2025still arriving
112
Grants FY2025still arriving
33
States reached
$2.3M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Science & Tech$80MHealth$22MEducation$7.1MSocial Science$1.7MHousing & Shelter$673kEmployment$671kFood & Nutrition$506kCommunity Improvement$311kOther$0
02FY2025 · 112 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 112 grants below total $16,036,376 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $281,160,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $265,123,624 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $70k
  • $10k–50k51 grants · $1.4M
  • $50k–250k36 grants · $4.4M
  • $250k+15 grants · $10M
$44,897
Median grant
33
States reached
$4.3B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DREXEL UNIVERSITY$2,275,672
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY$1,837,418
RECTORS AND VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA$1,133,782
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$697,369
SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY$697,231
REGENTS OF THE U OF CA IRVINE$516,695
TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$495,630
REGENTS OF THE U OF CA$385,304
THE SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES$375,111
CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY$350,981
GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY$323,924
REGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA LA$315,349
INDIANA UNIVERSITY$307,470
DUKE UNIVERSITY$273,587
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY$261,702
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $3.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Life And Independence For Today: $38k → 10%Transitional Paths to Independent Living: $33k → 12%Center For Independent Living Of NCPA: $37k → 12%Academic Development Inst: $699k → 14%Life and Independence for Today: $33k → 10%Transitional Paths to Independent Living: $28k → 12%Center For Independent Living Of NCPA: $34k → 12%Academic Development Inst: $614k → 14%Life And Independence For Today: $23k → 10%TRANSITIONAL PATHS TO INDEPENDENT LIVING: $24k → 12%Center For Independent Living Of NCPA: $31k → 12%Project Home: $125k → 22%Academic Development Inst: $570k → 14%Life And Independence For Today: $20k → 10%Transitional Paths to Independent Living: $22k → 12%CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING OF NCPA: $28k → 12%Academic Development Inst: $298k → 14%Life and Independence for Today: $19k → 10%Transitional Paths to Independent Living: $21k → 12%Center For Independent Living Of North Central PA: $25k → 12%Project Home: $76k → 22%Life And Independence For Today: $15k → 10%Tri-County Patriots For Independent Living: $19k → 12%Center For Independent Living Of NCPA: $24k → 12%Life And Independence For Today: $11k → 10%Transitional Paths to Independent Living: $19k → 12%Center For Independent Living Of NCPA: $23k → 12%Project Home: $51k → 22%LIFE AND INDEPENDENCE FOR TODAY: $5k → 10%Transitional Paths to Independent Living: $11k → 12%Center For Independent Living Of NCPA: $18k → 12%Transitional Paths to Independent Living: $6k → 12%Center For Independent Living Of NCPA: $11k → 12%Welcoming Center for New Pennsylvanians: $13k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$101M · 187 repeat orgs$4.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

187 repeat relationships — 89 still active in FY2025, 98 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

187
61

Total granted

$101M
$3.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+19%

Still filing today

63%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesScience & TechPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DU
    DREXEL UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $8.6M · revenue +10%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.6M · revenue +88%
  • SS
    STEPPINGSTONE SCHOLARS INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $2.5M · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • MM
    Miriam Medical Clinics
    one grant, 2024 · $486k
  • UO
    University of Texas at Dallas
    one grant, 2017 · $258k
  • TS
    THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2022 · $221k · revenue +1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
2
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
3
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
4
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
7
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
8
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
9
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
10
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
11
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
12
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgetown University and the most unlike its peers is General Hospital Combined Fund 47F044011. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsImmigrant Worker SupportAffordable Housing Developm…School Parent OrganizationsCancer Support ServicesYouth Development ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyDevelopmental Disabilities …Senior Support ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …Pregnancy Support ServicesJewish Community Organizati…Local History MuseumsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community College Foundatio…Health Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 55 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%50%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr16%10%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%63%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.4%1/250
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,315

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

172 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 172 of the 277 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
169/172
Grantees still filing
138/172
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Bioqual Incorporated — $3,000,946 · OtherBioqual IncorporatedRUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY — $2,808,632 · OtherRUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITYREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA — $2,644,999 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIAVCUVCU HEALTH CAMPUS — $2,553,273 · OtherVCUVCU HEALTH CAMPUSSTEPPINGSTONE SCHOLARS INC — $2,537,103 · OtherSTEPPINGSTONE SCHOLARS INCRECTOR & VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA — $2,362,239 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE — $2,222,017 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA — $1,778,144 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA — $1,606,579 · Other+93 more — $24,148,892 · Other+93 moreDREXEL UNIVERSITY — $8,565,122 · EducationDREXEL UNIVERSITYTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $5,591,802 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVAN…CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $2,202,440 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITYJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $1,982,626 · EducationUniversity of Chicago — $1,967,506 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $1,900,838 · EducationTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND — $1,560,386 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $1,519,030 · EducationASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC AND LAND-GRANT UNIVERSITIES — $1,496,560 · Education+42 more — $12,641,031 · Education+42 moreTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $2,604,776 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOS…THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS INC — $2,463,519 · HealthTHOMAS JEFFERSON U…The Childrens Hospital — $2,025,306 · HealthThe Childrens Hosp…MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER — $1,407,256 · HealthMONELL CHEMICAL SE…Hackensack Meridian Health Inc — $1,021,792 · HealthHackensack Meridia…SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $987,840 · HealthSEATTLE CHILDREN'S…The Miriam Hospital — $932,881 · HealthMEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION — $681,277 · Health+26 more — $5,963,054 · Health+26 moreACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC — $2,181,180 · Human ServicesPROJECT HOME — $251,976 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING OF NORTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA — $231,192 · Human ServicesTRANSITIONAL PATHS TO INDEPENDENT LIVING — $183,807 · Human ServicesLIFE AND INDEPENDENCE FOR TODAY — $163,682 · Human ServicesSTRATEGIC EDUCATION RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INSTITUTE — $600,009 · Science & TechResearch Triangle Institute — $577,640 · Science & TechThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies — $375,111 · Science & TechCORIELL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH INC — $206,313 · Science & TechTERC INC — $133,860 · Science & TechCENTER FOR POLICY RESEARCH — $1,682,834 · Public BenefitEDUCATION NORTHWEST — $145,197 · Public BenefitNorthwestern University — $1,608,959 · Recreation & Sports
Other$45,662,824Education$39,427,341Health$18,087,701Human Services$3,011,837Science & Tech$1,892,933Public Benefit$1,828,031Recreation & Sports$1,608,959

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY — $8,565,122 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $5,591,802 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $2,604,776 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPPINGSTONE SCHOLARS INC — $2,537,103 over 6y, 15% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS INC — $2,463,519 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE — $2,222,017 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $2,202,440 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC — $2,181,180 over 4y, 34% of budgetThe Childrens Hospital — $2,025,306 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $1,982,626 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $1,967,506 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $1,900,838 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR POLICY RESEARCH — $1,682,834 over 4y, 33% of budgetNorthwestern University — $1,608,959 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND — $1,560,386 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $1,519,030 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC AND LAND-GRANT UNIVERSITIES — $1,496,560 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetMONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER — $1,407,256 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $1,155,071 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern Methodist University — $1,113,920 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHackensack Meridian Health Inc — $1,021,792 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $987,840 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Miriam Hospital — $932,881 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetYale University — $725,154 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCAL POLY CORPORATION — $724,290 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION — $681,277 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York — $674,932 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $642,998 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTRATEGIC EDUCATION RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INSTITUTE — $600,009 over 6y, 4.5% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $580,510 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetResearch Triangle Institute — $577,640 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBELLWETHER EDUCATION PARTNERS INC — $554,063 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetIndiana University Foundation — $522,750 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH CENTRAL ORGANIZED REGIONALLY FOR TOTAL HEALTH INC — $506,228 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetThe Institute For Cancer Research — $500,781 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $493,090 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $466,996 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC — $458,482 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetVanderbilt University — $449,616 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $438,348 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetMaternity Care Coalition — $437,284 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA — $432,462 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetPublic Health Institute — $414,448 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LOS ANGELES FOUNDATION — $406,598 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetUniversity of New England — $406,540 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COOPER HEALTH SYSTEM A NEW JERSEY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION — $386,721 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine — $375,928 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies — $375,111 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds STEPPINGSTONE SCHOLARS INC ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE ↗
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Childrens Hospital ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR POLICY RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC AND LAND-GRANT UNIVERSITIES ↗
  • Who funds MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
  • Who funds Hackensack Meridian Health Inc ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds The Miriam Hospital ↗
  • Who funds Yale University ↗
  • Who funds CAL POLY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Drexel UniversityJohns Hopkins Univers…The Philadelphia Foun…The William Penn Foun…The Trustees of Colum…American Heart Associ…University of Pittsbu…United Way of Greater…Philadelphia Works IncYale UniversityThe George Washington…The Pew Charitable Tr…
Drexel UniversityPA41.2× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Drexel University · Johns Hopkins University · The Philadelphia Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York · American Heart Association Inc · University of Pittsburgh · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Philadelphia Works Inc · Yale University · The George Washington University · The Pew Charitable Trusts

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Temple University - of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Education Northwest — 44% of income from government
  • Coriell Institute for Medical Research Inc — 44% of income from government
  • Terc Inc — 44% of income from government
  • Christiana Care Health System Inc — 43% of income from government
  • Ada Forsyth Institute Inc — 38% of income from government
  • The Copeland Center for Wellness and Recovery Inc — 33% of income from government
  • University of Delaware — 30% of income from government
  • Medstar Health Research Institute Inc — 25% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Yale University — 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
  • Brandeis University — 9% of income from government
  • Northeastern University — 7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Nova Southeastern University Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Seton Hall University — 1% of income from government
  • The Nemours Foundation — 0% of income from government
  • The Cooper Health System a New Jersey Non-Profit Corporation — 0% of income from government
  • Williams College — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
22report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 277 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home