· Public charity
Next for Autism Inc
Next for autism transforms the national landscape of services for people with autism by strategically designing, launching, and supporting innovative programs.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k33 grants · $744k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEW ENGLAND CENTER FOR CHILDREN | $75,000 |
| BANDING TOGETHER | $25,000 |
| NORTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC | $25,000 |
| THE ARC WESTCHESTER FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| LEARNINGSPRING SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| COMMUNICATION 4 ALL INC | $25,000 |
| FISH IN A TREE | $25,000 |
| NEURODIVERSITY WORKS | $25,000 |
| THE ED ASNER FAMILY CENTER | $25,000 |
| TIKVA-ETTA & LAZEAR ISRAEL CENTER FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED (ETTA) | $25,000 |
| SOCIEDAD DE EDUCACION Y REHABILITACION (SER) DE PUERTO RICO INC | $25,000 |
| SHEPHERD'S WAY INC | $25,000 |
| HAVE DREAMS | $25,000 |
| EVOLVE COACHING INC | $25,000 |
| SOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $467k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
31 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $374k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TNTHE NEW ENGLAND CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC6× · 2018–2024 · $805k · revenue +28%
- THTHE HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC2× · 2018–2023 · $349k · revenue +22%
- IFINSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT INC2× · 2018–2024 · $205k · revenue +29%
Funded once
- ASAUTISM SPEAKSone grant, 2018 · $170k
- NANYC AUTISM CHARTER SCHOOLSgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $75k · revenue +77%
- OSOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $75k · revenue +6%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Potential engages children and adults with autism in personalized programs that help them realize their full potential.
We are committed to helping people with intellectual (cont. on schedule o) and developmental disabilities to live full lives.
Amid the proliferation of advice about treatment options for autism, the ability to access accurate information about research-validated approaches is critically important to those seeking effective treatment.
Teamability strives to ensure that children with severe multiple disabilities have the opportunity to benefit from therapeautic educational intervention to participate actively in life.
Helping adults and children with disabilities, (incl asd), become full participants in the community.
We help advance the independence of individuals with disabilities & other special needs.
The center's mission is to help children and adults with differing abilities achieve their dreams by overcoming barriers to living, working, learning & enjoying recreational opportunities in the community of their choice.
The virginia institute of autism is dedicated to helping people overcome the challenges of autism through innovative, evidence-based programs in education, outreach and adult services.
Assistance to families effected by autis
Comprehensive services including outpatient behavioral and educational services through research proven interventions for children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders (asd).
Melmark is a human services provider with premier private special education schools, professional development, training, and research centers. melmark is committed to enhancing the lives of individuals within diverse communities with…
The mission of eden ii programs is to support people with autism throughout their lives to achieve their full potential through service, science, and passion.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Services for the Underserved Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
102 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 102 of the 110 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE NEW ENGLAND CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD NETWORK OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY LIVING OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds PREVAIL NJ INC ↗
- Who funds ELIJA TRANSITIONAL PROGRAMS & SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds WESTCHESTER ARC FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JULIE AND MICHAEL TRACY FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The New York and Presbyterian Hospital ↗
- Who funds Emory University ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds NYC AUTISM CHARTER SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds COMMUNICATION 4 ALL INC ↗
- Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HAVE DREAMS ↗
- Who funds THE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERDS WAY INC ↗
- Who funds SPECTRUM360 ↗
- Who funds OUR PLACE OF NEW TRIER TOWNSHIP ↗
- Who funds Aabr Inc ↗
- Who funds Actionplay Incorporated ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds NYSARC INC - WESTCHESTER COUNTY CHAPTER ↗
- Who funds ELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EXCEPTIONAL MINDS ↗
- Who funds THE ED ASNER FAMILY CENTER ↗
- Who funds WILDERWOOD EQUINE THERAPY AND RESCUE ↗
- Who funds BANDING TOGETHER ↗
- Who funds LEARNINGSPRING SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Victory Academy Inc ↗
- Who funds MERCY UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds The Arc of Northern Virginia ↗
- Who funds THE NEW 42ND STREET INC ↗
- Who funds Full Spectrum Features NFP ↗
- Who funds THEATRE DEVELOPMENT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds EMPOWERING PEOPLE INSPIRING CAPABILITIES INC ↗
- Who funds SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Coleman Foundation Inc · The Arc of the United States · The Disability Fund Inc · Td Charitable Foundation · The Warburg Pincus Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Analog Devices Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Next for Autism Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Abilis Inc — 74% of income from government
- Association for Autism and Neurodiversity Inc — 24% of income from government
- The New England Center for Children Inc — 3% of income from government
- Side Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Rutgers University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.