· Public charity
Caring Across Generations Inc
Our mission is to change our culture and policy in America to value and support caregiving.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 22 grants below total $691,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $843,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $151,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k18 grants · $352k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $340k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Justice in Aging | $150,000 |
| The ICA Group Inc | $90,000 |
| Missouri Jobs with Justice | $50,000 |
| Equality California Institute | $50,000 |
| National Women's Law Center | $40,000 |
| MomsRising Education Fund (MREF) | $40,000 |
| Pilipino Workers Center of Southern California | $40,000 |
| Autistic Self Advocacy Network | $30,000 |
| Community Partners | $25,000 |
| Bend the Arc A Jewish Partnership for Justice Hand in Hand | $20,000 |
| Tides Center | $20,000 |
| Access Living | $18,500 |
| 9 To 5 National Association Of Working Women | $15,000 |
| New Disabled South | $15,000 |
| Black Californians United for Early Care and Education | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 39% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The National Legal Advocacy Network d/b/a Grassroots Law & Organizing for Workers is a legal non-profit organization dedicated to using legal strategies as a tool to build power for marginalized workers and create systemic change through…
The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
Ala is the catalyst for growth by providing: diverse educational experiences, engaged peer communities, strategic solutions, dynamic resources, and trusted networks.
Afl-cio union lawyers alliance was established to better the conditions of working men and women and their families by enhancing the quality of legal representation that is available to the afl-cio and the national and international unions…
The national association of state workforce agencies (naswa) mission is to enhance the state workforce agencies' ability to accomplish their goals, statutory roles and responsibilities.
To develop and advocate for legislation, regulations, ballot initiatives, and government programs as a voice of the working class, to promote social justice, and to stimulate the economy; and, to conduct research, educate the public, and…
Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…
The national employment lawyers association's (nela) mission is to empower workers' rights attorneys through legal training, promoting a fair judiciary, and advocating for laws and policies that level the playing field for workers. we…
Justice Action Center JAC pilots an innovative model that advances the rights of immigrant communities by connecting cutting-edge impact litigation and compelling narrative and communications content. The purpose of JAC is to advance the…
The american civil liberties union of northern california (aclu nc union) defends and advances the principles of freedom, equality and justice contained in the united states constitution. aclu nc union, a california mutual benefit…
Towards justice is a nonprofit law firm that seeks to advance economic equity and worker power through impact litigation, strategic policy advocacy, and collaboration with organizers and public agencies. we were founded in response to the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Access Living of Metropolitan Chicago and the most unlike its peers is California Alliance for Retired Americans. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JUSTICE IN AGING ↗
- Who funds THE ICA GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds EQUALITY CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI JOBS WITH JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds MOMSRISING EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds PILIPINO WORKERS CENTER OF SOUTHERN ↗
- Who funds AUTISTIC SELF ADVOCACY NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
- Who funds BEND THE ARC - A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds Access Living of Metropolitan Chicago ↗
- Who funds BLACK CALIFORNIANS UNITED FOR EARLY CARE AND EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds 9TO5 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WORKING WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds New Disabled South Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES ↗
- Who funds NEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS ↗
- Who funds Michigan Advocacy Program ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES ↗
- Who funds LITTLE LOBBYISTS ACTION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds MICHIGAN ORGANIZING PROJECT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Tides Foundation · National Domestic Workers Alliance Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · WK Kellogg Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Impactassetsinc · NEO Philanthropy Inc · New Venture Fund · The Ford Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · Hopewell Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Caring Across Generations Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Caring Across Generations Inc?
Find your warmest path to Caring Across Generations Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.