Skip to content

Maryland · Nonprofit

IMPACT SILVER SPRING

IMPACT SILVER SPRING (Maryland) receives grants from 23 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,646,498 to it, the largest being GREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($993,662). 15 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$1.0M
Funders on record
23
Grants received
$2.6M
Net assets
$150k
15/23 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 50%
01What it does

What Impact Silver Spring does

Mission

To build and sustain community-based networks that support people who are creating social, economic, and civic momentum that contributes to inclusive local economies and vibrant communities.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Neighborhood opportunity network - strengthens social networks in diverse neighborhoods that lead to people and communities that are healthier,more economically stable and more engaged in civic participation. Impact supports many struggling families in empowerment pathways by creating multiple spaces in the network where people from diverse backgrounds can come together to form new businesses, improve their neighborhood conditions and achieve personal develoment goals. Included is the local economy program, which is a network supporting micro businesses and worker-owned cooperates. Also, included the the neighborhood campaign, which encourgaes community building and civic participation.

    $1,009,557 spentof which $45,100 as grants
    84% of program spending
  2. Impact sports - provides recreational sports and enrichment for hundreds of low-income and immigrant youth. This program empowers families to form and operate youth sports teams in neighborhoods where young people are typically disconnected from local athletic leagues.

    $189,026 spent
    16% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,198,583.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($919k) Expenses 100 ($912k) Net assets 100 ($213k)2018 Revenue 114 ($1.1M) Expenses 110 ($1.0M) Net assets 124 ($264k)2019 Revenue 117 ($1.1M) Expenses 117 ($1.1M) Net assets 125 ($266k)2020 Revenue 138 ($1.3M) Expenses 135 ($1.2M) Net assets 141 ($301k)2021 Revenue 152 ($1.4M) Expenses 132 ($1.2M) Net assets 299 ($637k)2022 Revenue 145 ($1.3M) Expenses 146 ($1.3M) Net assets 300 ($639k)2023 Revenue 137 ($1.3M) Expenses 156 ($1.4M) Net assets 187 ($399k)2024 Revenue 157 ($1.4M) Expenses 161 ($1.5M) Net assets 207 ($441k)2025 Revenue 114 ($1.0M) Expenses 146 ($1.3M) Net assets 70 ($150k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (114)Expenses (146)Net assets (70)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $491k to $238k (−52%).

$293k
$313k
$296k
$479k
$696k
$697k
$465k
$491k
$238k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 63% · 2018 59% · 2019 61% · 2020 47% · 2021 61% · 2022 55% · 2023 72% · 2024 59% · 2025 78%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

100% of IMPACT SILVER SPRING’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (82% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 3,053 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$6k
’17
$51k
’18
$2k
’19
$34k
’20
$192k
’21
$3k
’22
−$159k
’23
−$33k
’24
−$291k
’25
0.5
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed1099899798
Joined·+0+2+0+1+1+2+4+0
No longer listed·12101421
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 8 funders to 9 funders, grant income rose $87k → $328k.

8 of 23 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 41% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of IMPACT SILVER SPRING’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 22 of 23 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

IMPACT SILVER SPRING leans on a few funders — its largest provides 38% of grant income and the top three 72%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

50% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund IMPACT SILVER SPRING.

38%
largest funder
72%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 35% · 2018 30% · 2019 41% · 2020 42% · 2021 60% · 2022 38% · 2023 40% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

47% of IMPACT SILVER SPRING's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 65% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

IMPACT SILVER SPRING draws 80% of its grant income from funders outside Maryland, across 6 states in all.

IL
NY
CA
VA
MD
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Maryland out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.1M arriving through sponsors registered in 6 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

IMPACT SILVER SPRING's funding base is broadening — from 8 funders to 9 as grant income climbed.

Operating margin−28% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve0.5mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)2% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,645 philanthropy nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like IMPACT SILVER SPRING

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Maryland

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

77% of spending goes to programs.

Program 77%Management 20%Fundraising 2%

Governance

6
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

85%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

MD

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for IMPACT SILVER SPRING: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds IMPACT SILVER SPRING?
IMPACT SILVER SPRING (Maryland) receives grants from 23 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,646,498 to it, the largest being GREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($993,662). 15 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does IMPACT SILVER SPRING have?
IRS filings report 23 organizations giving $2,646,498 in grants to IMPACT SILVER SPRING, 15 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of IMPACT SILVER SPRING?
GREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $993,662 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like IMPACT SILVER SPRING find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Maryland. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Impact Silver Spring →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 23 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing