Skip to content

New York · Private foundation

The Stringer Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2026(still arriving)
16
Grants FY2026
15
Organizations funded FY2025
7%
First-time grantees FY2025
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2026
$45,000
Largest grant, FY2026
$312,500
Organizations funded a year
15 to 17
FY2021 to FY2025
States reached, FY2026
5
Total assets, FY2026
$25M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2025, 7% of the organizations The Stringer Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 2% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2026still arriving16$1.2M0%
FY202515$1.2M7%
FY202417$1.2M0%
FY202317$1.1M0%
FY202217$1.1M0%
FY202117$1.1Mn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$3.3MEducation$996kYouth Development$380kCrime & Legal$340kHuman Services$240kAnimals$205kPhilanthropy$200kArts & Culture$105kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2026, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 12 grantees
All grantees of The Stringer Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
National Brain Tumor Society Inc$1,200,00062%
Bronx Letters Foundation$541,075630%
Reach Out and Read Inc$290,00060%
Read Ahead Inc$250,00062%
Jumpstart for Young Children Inc$250,00060%
The Salvation Army$215,0006n/a
Public Media Group of Southern California$130,00060%
Los Angeles Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals$120,00060%
Haven Hills Inc$90,00061%
Greater Los Angeles Zoological Association$85,00040%
Mercy Haven Inc$45,0002n/a
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals$25,00050%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 6 recipients with no EIN on record ($3.7M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

The Stringer Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 10 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNational Brain Tumor Society Inc: $1,200,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetBronx Letters Foundation: $541,075 over 6y, 30% of budgetReach Out and Read Inc: $290,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetRead Ahead Inc: $250,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetJumpstart for Young Children Inc: $250,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPublic Media Group of Southern California: $130,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLos Angeles Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: $120,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHaven Hills Inc: $90,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetGreater Los Angeles Zoological Association: $85,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetThe American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 10.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Stringer Foundation with peer funders

About The Stringer Foundation

How much does The Stringer Foundation give?
The Stringer Foundation reported 16 grants totaling $1,232,500 in its FY2026 IRS filing. It funded between 15 and 17 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2025.
What does The Stringer Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2026, its largest causes are Health (57%), Education (17%), Youth Development (7%).
Who are The Stringer Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2026: National Brain Tumor Society Inc ($1.2M), Bronx Letters Foundation ($541k), Reach Out and Read Inc ($290k).
Does The Stringer Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2025, 7% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Stringer Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Stringer Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is The Stringer Foundation based?
The Stringer Foundation is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stringer’s filings →

More from the funding graph