Loading…

BAISLEY POWELL ELEBASH FUND XXXXX5009

Foundation Dossiers

· Private foundation

BAISLEY POWELL ELEBASH FUND XXXXX5009

This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.

$3.7M

Granted FY2022

16

Grants

1

Communities

$1.0M

Largest

01What you fundRead

03Your edgeRead

04Your fieldRead

05Through PlinthRead

01What you fund

01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 43% of BAISLEY POWELL ELEBASH FUND XXXXX5009’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

orchestra

2021

—

2022

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2022 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

$10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$50k–250k11 grants · $1.6M
$250k+4 grants · $2.0M

$175,000

Median grant

1

States reached

$89k

Total assets

Largest grants

GRADUATE CENTER FOUNDATION INC$1,000,000
MAMA FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS$450,000
THE HARLEM CHAMBER PLAYERS$300,000
BROOKLYN CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC$300,000
THE JAZZ GALLERY$225,000
GREENWICH HOUSE INC$200,000
ROULETTE INTERMEDIUM INC$200,000
RATTLESTICK PRODUCTIONS INC$175,000
BROOKLYN BALLET$150,000
BLOOMINGDALE SCHOOL OF MUSIC$150,000
AFRO-LATIN JAZZ ALLIANCE OF NEW YORK$150,000
KINGS MAJESTIC CORP DBA 651 ARTS$100,000
CLASSICAL THEATRE OF HARLEM$100,000
SOCIETY OF THE THIRD STREET MUSIC SCHOOL$100,000
GRANTMAKERS IN THE ARTS$100,000

02The need

04

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 18% — the area typically sits at 13%. 100% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$7.5M · 18 repeat orgs$800k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2022, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18

2

Total granted

$7.5M

$150k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%

+80%

Still filing today

67%

100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $650k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

RI
Roulette Intermedium Inc
3× · 2020–2022 · $700k · revenue +30%
MF
MAMA FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS
2× · 2021–2022 · $600k · revenue +177% · 28% of their budget
MS
MANHATTAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC
2× · 2020–2021 · $550k · revenue +18%

Funded once

OC
ORPHEUS CHAMBER ORCHESTRA INC
one grant, 2020 · $75k · revenue -14%
AC
American Composers Orchestra Incgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $75k · revenue +80%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1

American Chamber Ensemble Inc

The American Chamber Ensemble is a consortium of distinguished musicians whose concerts explore the music for piano with strings, woodwinds and/or voice, presenting both great standard repertoire and living American composers.

—

2

Brooklyn Academy of Music Inc

Bam is the home for adventurous artists, audiences, and ideas.

—

3

The Bronx Council On the Arts

A pioneering advocate for cultural equity, the bronx council on the arts nurtures the development of diverse artists and arts organizations and builds strong cultural connections in and beyond the bronx.

Arts & Culture

4

New York Concert Artists Associates Inc

To enhance and promote musical performances of all kinds of ensembles such as orchestras, chamber ensembles, and solo recitals by providing a variety of performance opportunities and personal networks to members of musicians in new york so…

Arts & Culture

5

The New York Classical Players Inc

The New York Classical Players Inc is a professional performing group of highly-giftedyoung instrumentalists from different cultures committed to bringing classicalrepertoire concerts to the public.

Arts & Culture

6

Bargemusic Ltd

For 45 years bargemusic continues to be dedicted to enhancing the cultural life of new york city by presenting concerts giving performance opportunities to a diverse group of musicians and serving the community by providing many admissions…

Arts & Culture

7

Bronx Opera Company Inc

Performance of opera in fully-staged productions with orchestra and in concert

Arts & Culture

8

Center for Traditional Music and Dance Inc

The Center for Traditional Music and Dance works in partnership with New York City immigrant communities to sustain diverse performing arts traditions and share them with the general public.

Arts & Culture

9

Chicago Opera Theater

Chicago opera theater expands the tradition of opera as a living art form by engaging lovers of music and storytelling through innovative experiences, predominantly of new and rarely performed works.

Arts & Culture

10

On Site Opera Inc

On Site Operas mission is to:produce site-specific productions in venues throughout New York Cityenrich the cultural life of New York by bringing opera to new audiences who otherwise may not have the opportunity to experience this type of…

—

11

Accessible Contemporary Music

To promote the music of living composers through concerts, educational programs and by fostering new works by composers at all levels of development.

Arts & Culture

12

San Francisco Conservatory of Music

The conservatory offers undergraduate, graduate and postgraduate musical education.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Orpheus Chamber Orchestra Inc and the most unlike its peers is New Music Usa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

2

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

11

Early backer (in before they grew)

20/20

Grantees still filing

17/20

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Arts & Culture$4,750,000Other$3,575,000Community Improvement$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Howard Gilman Foundation IncNY37.1× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Howard Gilman Foundation Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Booth Ferris Foundation Xxxxx4008 · The Ford Foundation · The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · The Amphion Foundation Inc · The Aaron Copland Fund for Music Inc · Cornelia T Bailey Charitable Trust · New Music USA Inc · Ann & Gordon Getty Foundation · Mid Atlantic Arts Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation BAISLEY POWELL ELEBASH FUND XXXXX5009 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MAMA FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~9 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.8× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 311614732 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MAMA FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 9 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 28% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Baisley Powell Elebash Fund Xxxxx5009?

Find your warmest path to Baisley Powell Elebash Fund Xxxxx5009 through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

More from the funding graph

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

Strange bedfellows

the named clusters of US funding

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

where grant money is based, and what stays home

State money flows

the interactive map of money crossing state lines