Skip to content

Minnesota · Nonprofit

GOOD IN THE 'HOOD

GOOD IN THE 'HOOD (Minnesota) receives grants from 50 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,089,459 to it, the largest being HUNGER SOLUTIONS MINNESOTA ($438,359). 33 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$2.4M
Funders on record
50
Grants received
$2.1M
Net assets
$2.3M
33/50 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 24%
01What it does

What Good in the 'Hood does

Mission

Simply making a difference by bringing help and inspiring hope.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Food programs, traditional food shelf programs and hot meals and groceries to induividuals and families in need.provided food to 66,655 children between the ages of 0-17. Provided food to 84,234 adults between the ages of 18-65. Provided food to 13,106 seniors from 65 and over. Total number of individuals provided food to was 163,995. Total number of lbs of food provided to individuals in need 1,815,245. Hot meal program served 14,505 hot meals. Our food programs served up to 7 days of groceries per month from 30 host sites serving 57,653 households distributed 5,360 emergency food and resource packs for the unsheltered from 5 partner locations. Side by side youth programming fed breakfast meals through our the feed event to 235 high school youth. We did a hawaii mission with 12 students.

    $1,365,022 spent
    76% of program spending
  2. Shoe away hunger - providing shoes at very low cost or free to needed areas in the twin cities/metro area.31,869 pairs of shoes distributed at 50 shoe events providing essential footwear to those in need with a particular emphasis on schools and shelters.collected and sorted 40,473 pairs of shoes.distributed 1,240 boxes of school supplies to children in need to 4 partner locations. Solecare for souls-providing foot care and practical support for those experiencing homeless and all those unable to access affordable foot care. 7 sites that provided 2,938 client care sessions with each client receiving 2 pairs of free socks.

    $385,910 spent
    21% of program spending
  3. Holiday help adopt-a-family holiday help provided over 593 families with gift cards/gifts and groceries to providing a festive winter holiday celebration representing 2,207 children in need. Extreme sponsorships of $2,500 or more in gifts were provided for 2 families in crisis.distributed 498 winter coats and 687 wool socks to refugee families in need.free family photos with a professional photographer for families.

    $52,675 spent
    3% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,803,607.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20202020 Revenue 100 ($3.2M) Expenses 100 ($2.6M) Net assets 100 ($1.3M)2021 Revenue 59 ($1.9M) Expenses 72 ($1.9M) Net assets 109 ($1.4M)2022 Revenue 53 ($1.7M) Expenses 68 ($1.8M) Net assets 106 ($1.4M)2023 Revenue 84 ($2.7M) Expenses 78 ($2.0M) Net assets 159 ($2.1M)2024 Revenue 58 ($1.9M) Expenses 79 ($2.0M) Net assets 147 ($1.9M)2025 Revenue 75 ($2.4M) Expenses 81 ($2.1M) Net assets 172 ($2.3M)
202020212022202320242025
Revenue (75)Expenses (81)Net assets (172)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $1.4M to $2.2M (+56%).

$1.4M
$1.5M
$1.4M
$2.2M
$2.2M
$2.5M
202020212022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 26% · 2021 16% · 2022 23% · 2023 19% · 2024 26% · 2025 27%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

99% of GOOD IN THE 'HOOD’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (81% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 11,814 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

$645k
’20
$28k
’21
−$42k
’22
$696k
’23
−$159k
’24
$326k
’25
6.4
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Shawn Morrison

Executive director

Board chair

Jonathan Behnken

Board chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

202020212022202320242025
Listed109910108
Joined·+0+2+3+1+0
No longer listed·12212
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 7 funders to 22 funders, grant income rose $94k → $410k.

11 of 50 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 28% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $138k from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Sole Care for Souls). These are real filings, and they are not money GOOD IN THE 'HOOD raised.

From the IRS filings of GOOD IN THE 'HOOD’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 50 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

GOOD IN THE 'HOOD has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 21% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

62% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund GOOD IN THE 'HOOD.

21%
largest funder
42%
top three
~11
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 66% · 2018 36% · 2019 24% · 2020 43% · 2021 17% · 2022 17% · 2023 42% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

43% of GOOD IN THE 'HOOD's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 66% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

93% of GOOD IN THE 'HOOD's grant income comes from Minnesota funders.

MN
WI
NY
SD
NJ
CT
RI
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Minnesota out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $576k arriving through sponsors registered in 9 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

GOOD IN THE 'HOOD runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 7,349 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin13% · above the median
Months of reserve6.4mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−6% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 7,349 human services nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like GOOD IN THE 'HOOD

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Minnesota

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

86% of spending goes to programs.

Program 86%Management 11%Fundraising 3%

Governance

7
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

67%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

MN

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for GOOD IN THE 'HOOD: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds GOOD IN THE 'HOOD?
GOOD IN THE 'HOOD (Minnesota) receives grants from 50 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,089,459 to it, the largest being HUNGER SOLUTIONS MINNESOTA ($438,359). 33 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does GOOD IN THE 'HOOD have?
IRS filings report 50 organizations giving $2,089,459 in grants to GOOD IN THE 'HOOD, 33 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of GOOD IN THE 'HOOD?
HUNGER SOLUTIONS MINNESOTA is the largest funder on record, with $438,359 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like GOOD IN THE 'HOOD find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Minnesota. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Good in the 'Hood →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2020–2025), and the filings of 50 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing