Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

UNFI Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$213k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Food & Nutrition$5.4MEnvironment$845kCommunity Improvement$526kHuman Services$397kEmployment$120kHousing & Shelter$104kHealth$100kEducation$93kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $195k
$10,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Zero Foodprint$35,000
Food Forward$10,000
Reaching Beyond the Walls RVA$10,000
Interfaith Human Services of Putnam$10,000
Nourish Colorado$10,000
Anoka County Brotherhood Council Inc (ACBC Food Shelf)$10,000
United Indians of All Tribes Foundation$10,000
McAuley Ministries$10,000
Sustainable Food Center$10,000
Venture Cafe Foundation$10,000
The Food Group Minnesota Inc$10,000
The Food Trust$10,000
Paul's Pantry Inc$10,000
Kim's Krew Inc$10,000
Aspiring Texas Latinos Achieving Succeeding Together DBA La Tiendita$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $633k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JANNUS INC: $15k → 8%CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $13k → 9%OLIVEWOOD GARDENS AND LEARNING CENTER: $10k → 11%CAROLS KITCHEN INC: $10k → 11%HEALING FOR THE SOUL MINISTRIES INC: $5k → 20%FILLING IN THE BLANKS INC: $15k → 9%Good Neighbors Inc: $10k → 14%IN HER SHOES INC: $10k → 10%WHITE COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC: $10k → 12%HIGH PLAINS HELPING HANDS INC: $15k → 9%MOUNT CARMEL HEALTH WELLNESS AND COMMUNITY CENTER: $11k → 18%Realize Impact: $101k → 10%Reaching Beyond the Walls RVA: $10k → 7%JANNUS INC: $15k → 8%MERRICK COMMUNITY SERVICES: $20k → 14%CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $13k → 9%TIDES CENTER: $10k → 10%FILLING IN THE BLANKS INC: $15k → 9%HIGH PLAINS HELPING HANDS INC: $11k → 9%MOUNT CARMEL HEALTH WELLNESS AND COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 18%Propeller: $25k → 23%CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $13k → 9%MATTHEW 25: $20k → 9%OPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA INC: $50k → 11%MATTHEW 25: $15k → 9%OPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA INC: $40k → 11%MATTHEW 25: $10k → 9%OPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA INC: $30k → 11%OPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA INC: $25k → 11%GROWING GARDENS: $15k → 12%Crossroads Rhode Island: $5k → 14%GROWING GARDENS: $11k → 12%SO ALL MAY EAT INC: $15k → 12%AFRICAN ALLIANCE OF RHODE ISLAND: $13k → 14%GOOD IN THE HOOD: $10k → 11%AFRICAN ALLIANCE OF RHODE ISLAND: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
NC
DC
HI
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.6M · 120 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +69% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

120 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 114 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

120
135

Total granted

$5.6M
$2.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+26%

Still filing today

90%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $128k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionEnvironmentHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY LAND TRUST
    6× · 2019–2024 · $215k · revenue +32%
  • OA
    OPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA
    4× · 2019–2023 · $145k · revenue +309%
  • FOODCORPS INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $140k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • Realize Impact
    one grant, 2024 · $101k · revenue 0%
  • N
    NMSDC
    one grant, 2024 · $80k
  • NA
    NOURISH AND BLOOM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Action

Our mission is to educate, organize and advocate for food and farming systems to become economically prosperous, ecologically sound and socially equitable.

—
2
Nashville Food Project Inc

The nashville food project brings people together to grow, cook, and share nourishing food, with the goals of cultivating community and alleviating hunger in our city.

Food & Nutrition
3
Sustainable Growers
—
4
Common Good City Farm

Common Good City Farm is an urban farm in Washington, DC, where community members source fresh food, see sustainable urban agriculture in action, and learn healthy skills. Our mission is to sustain and support a more equitable community…

Food & Nutrition
5
Foodwise Community

Foodwise grows thriving communities through the power and joy of local food. We envision a world that nourishes all people, local economies, and the living earth.

—
6
Sprout City Farms

Sprout city farms collaborates with communities to pursue food justice by cultivating innovative, restorative, and educational farms. sprout city farms envisions a thriving and equitable food system supported by a network of farms and…

Food & Nutrition
7
Chicago's Green City Market Program

Green city market is securing the future of food by deepening support for sustainable farmers, educating our community, and expanding access to locally-grown food.

Food & Nutrition
8
The Food Alliance

Food alliance works at the juncture of science, business and values to define and promote sustainability in agriculture and the food industry, and to ensure safe and fair working conditions, humane treatment of animals, and careful…

Arts & Culture
9
Fair Food Network Inc

Fair food network is organized to grow community health, wealth, and resilience through food, to increase access to affordable healthy food, help local food economies thrive and build resilience in local food and agriculture systems.

Food & Nutrition
10
Local Food Solutions

We work to expand access to local food for more people in the community through the purchase, aggregation, storage, marketing and delivery of fresh, safe, local food in partnership with local growers.

Food & Nutrition
11
Seed Peace

To grow the local food supply by supporting farmers, preparing food plants for climate change and increasing health giving food availability for people in need

—
12
Ag & Food Lab

To provide equitably resource producers and other food organizations focused on food security opportunities programs and services aimed at effective stewardship of resilient food ecosystems and related charitable programs and services…

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope & Main and the most unlike its peers is All Relations United. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFood Banks and PantriesCommunity FoundationsPolicy Research and AdvocacyEnvironmental Conservation …Immigrant Worker SupportYmca Youth DevelopmentCommunity Food PantriesHealth Access Advocacy and …Youth Development CentersCommunity College Foundatio…Affordable Housing Developm…United Way AffiliatesLocal Food System Organizat…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%33%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%6%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%39%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%3%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.8%2/237
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,328

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

227 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 227 of the 271 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
89
Early backer (in before they grew)
223/227
Grantees still filing
161/227
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FOODCORPS INC — $140,000 · Food & NutritionFOODCORPS INCTHE URBAN FOOD INITIATIVE INC — $120,000 · Food & NutritionCCOF FOUNDATION — $105,000 · Food & NutritionMAINE ORGANIC FARMERS AND GARDENERS ASSOCIATION — $100,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND CHANCE FOODS INC — $90,000 · Food & Nutrition+61 more — $2,000,876 · Food & Nutrition+61 moreOregon Tilth Inc — $105,000 · OtherORGANIC SEED ALLIANCE — $94,500 · OtherNMSDC — $80,000 · OtherFoodWhat Incorporated — $134,500 · OtherFoodWhat Incorporated+68 more — $1,858,193 · Other+68 moreDENVER URBAN GARDENS — $126,000 · EnvironmentDENVER URBAN GA…THE ORGANIC CENTER INC — $84,147 · EnvironmentTHE ORGANIC CEN…ECO-JUSTICE CENTER INC — $61,025 · EnvironmentECO-JUSTICE CEN…Guidestone — $55,500 · EnvironmentGuidestoneHARLEM GROWN INC — $55,000 · EnvironmentHARLEM GROWN IN…CLIMATE COLLABORATIVE — $50,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF ZENGER FARM — $47,500 · EnvironmentGEORGIA ORGANICS INC — $40,500 · EnvironmentKANSAS CITY COMMUNITY GARDENS INC — $40,000 · EnvironmentFAMILYFARMED DBA GOOD FOOD CATALYST — $40,000 · EnvironmentPesticide Action Network North America — $37,500 · EnvironmentINDIAN CREEK NATURE CENTER — $36,000 · EnvironmentWild Farm Alliance — $35,000 · EnvironmentLAND FOR GOOD INC — $35,000 · EnvironmentMULTIPLIER — $35,000 · Environment+14 more — $242,950 · Environment+14 moreOPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA — $145,000 · Human ServicesOPEN ARMS …Realize Impact — $100,500 · Human ServicesRealize Im…THE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT — $67,500 · Human ServicesTHE CERES …SACRAMENTO LOAVES & FISHES — $51,250 · Human ServicesSACRAMENTO…HOMELESS GARDEN PROJECT — $47,500 · Human ServicesHOMELESS G…MATTHEW 25 — $45,000 · Human ServicesMATTHEW 25JANNUS INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesFILLING IN THE BLANKS INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesGrowing Gardens — $26,250 · Human ServicesFRESH START CENTER INC — $25,500 · Human ServicesSOCIAL ENTREPRENEURS OF NEW ORLEANS — $25,000 · Human Services+5 more — $98,500 · Human Services+5 moreMandela Partners Prev Mandela Marketplace Inc — $118,750 · Community ImprovementHOPE & MAIN — $77,000 · Community ImprovementALCHEMIST CDC — $40,000 · Community ImprovementTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC — $32,500 · Community ImprovementPROJECT ANGEL HEART — $27,000 · Community ImprovementGARDENEERS — $55,000 · EducationOrganic Growers School Inc — $40,500 · EducationCHEF ANN FOUNDATION — $40,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA FARMLINK — $32,500 · EducationLife Lab Science Program — $30,000 · EducationFood For Thought Denver — $20,500 · EducationTHE COMPASS SCHOOL — $20,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION — $18,596 · EducationSOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY LAND TRUST — $215,000 · PhilanthropyTRELLIS FOR TOMORROW — $15,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $15,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF THE DUTCHESS-ORANGE REGION INC — $10,000 · Philanthropy
Food & Nutrition$2,555,876Other$2,272,193Environment$1,021,122Human Services$692,000Community Improvement$295,250Education$257,096Philanthropy$255,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY LAND TRUST — $215,000 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetOPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA — $145,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetFOODCORPS INC — $140,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFoodWhat Incorporated — $134,500 over 7y, 3.8% of budgetDENVER URBAN GARDENS — $126,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetTHE URBAN FOOD INITIATIVE INC — $120,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetMandela Partners Prev Mandela Marketplace Inc — $118,750 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetCCOF FOUNDATION — $105,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetOregon Tilth Inc — $105,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetRealize Impact — $100,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMAINE ORGANIC FARMERS AND GARDENERS ASSOCIATION — $100,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetORGANIC SEED ALLIANCE — $94,500 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetSECOND CHANCE FOODS INC — $90,000 over 4y, 7.9% of budgetTHE ORGANIC CENTER INC — $84,147 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetForage Inc — $80,500 over 5y, 7.5% of budgetAGRICULTURE AND LAND BASED TRAINING ASSOCIATION — $80,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetANGELIC ORGANICS LEARNING CENTER INC — $80,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetHOPE & MAIN — $77,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetLA COCINA VA — $75,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetMeans Database Inc — $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT — $67,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetPIE RANCH — $65,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetECO-JUSTICE CENTER INC — $61,025 over 4y, 7.6% of budgetCOOKING WITH KIDS INC — $60,500 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetRecipe for Success Foundation — $60,500 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetZERO FOODPRINT — $60,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGuidestone — $55,500 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetGARDENEERS — $55,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetFARM FRESH RHODE ISLAND INC — $55,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHARLEM GROWN INC — $55,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTHE GOOD ACRE — $55,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetJust Roots Inc — $55,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetSACRAMENTO LOAVES & FISHES — $51,250 over 4y, 0.2% of budget18 Reasons — $51,250 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetPILOT LIGHT — $50,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetNATIONAL MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCLIMATE COLLABORATIVE — $50,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetSUSTAINABLE FOOD CENTER — $50,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetDRUID CITY GARDEN PROJECT — $50,000 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetTHE CORNUCOPIA PROJECT INC — $50,000 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetREFED INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMOVE FOR HUNGER INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSLP SEEDS — $50,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetHMONG AMERICAN FARMERS ASSOCIATION — $50,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetHOMELESS GARDEN PROJECT — $47,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF ZENGER FARM — $47,500 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetORGANIC FARMING RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $46,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetMARBLESEED INC — $45,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds OPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds FOODCORPS INC ↗
  • Who funds FoodWhat Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds DENVER URBAN GARDENS ↗
  • Who funds THE URBAN FOOD INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds Mandela Partners Prev Mandela Marketplace Inc ↗
  • Who funds CCOF FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Oregon Tilth Inc ↗
  • Who funds Realize Impact ↗
  • Who funds MAINE ORGANIC FARMERS AND GARDENERS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ORGANIC SEED ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds SECOND CHANCE FOODS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ORGANIC CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Forage Inc ↗
  • Who funds AGRICULTURE AND LAND BASED TRAINING ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ANGELIC ORGANICS LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE & MAIN ↗
  • Who funds LA COCINA VA ↗
  • Who funds Means Database Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds PIE RANCH ↗
  • Who funds ECO-JUSTICE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COOKING WITH KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Recipe for Success Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ZERO FOODPRINT ↗
  • Who funds Guidestone ↗
  • Who funds GARDENEERS ↗
  • Who funds FARM FRESH RHODE ISLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds HARLEM GROWN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GOOD ACRE ↗
  • Who funds Just Roots Inc ↗
  • Who funds SACRAMENTO LOAVES & FISHES ↗
  • Who funds 18 Reasons ↗
  • Who funds PILOT LIGHT ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Clif Family FoundationPatagoniaorgFarm Aid IncGreater Cedar Rapids …Rsf Social Finance IncCommunity Foundation …Blooming Prairie Fdn …The Schmidt Family Fo…Foundation for Sustai…Fair Food Network IncNewman's Own Foundati…The Sprouts Healthy C…
Clif Family FoundationCA93.7× affinity59 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Clif Family Foundation · Patagoniaorg · Farm Aid Inc · Greater Cedar Rapids Community Foundation · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Community Foundation for San Benito County · Blooming Prairie Fdn Inc Investment Agy · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Foundation for Sustainability and Innovation · Fair Food Network Inc · Newman's Own Foundation · The Sprouts Healthy Communities Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization UNFI Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Oregon Tilth Inc — 34% of income from government
  • Northeast Organic Farming Association of Vermont — 31% of income from government
  • Friends of Zenger Farm — 28% of income from government
  • Foodcorps Inc — 21% of income from government
  • Just Roots Inc — 15% of income from government
  • Regional Environmental Council Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Growing Gardens — 6% of income from government
  • Gaining Ground Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
86report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 271 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines