· Private foundation
44 North Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k18 grants · $96k
- $10k–50k40 grants · $749k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ACADEMY OF HOLY ANGELS | $150,000 |
| CRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL | $40,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES | $40,000 |
| LOAVES AND FISHES | $30,000 |
| SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND | $30,000 |
| MINNESOTA ASSISTANCE COUNCIL FOR VETERANS | $30,000 |
| SHARING AND CARING HANDS | $25,000 |
| PEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE | $25,000 |
| BIG SKY BRAVERY | $22,500 |
| WARRIORS AND QUIET WATERS FOUNDATION INC | $22,500 |
| SIMPSON HOUSING SERVICES | $22,000 |
| MILITARY WARRIORS SUPPORT FOUNDATION | $22,000 |
| BRIDGE FOR YOUTH | $22,000 |
| GOOD IN THE HOOD | $22,000 |
| WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT | $22,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $306k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
36 repeat relationships — 35 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $246k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MAMINNESOTA ASSISTANCE COUNCIL FOR VETERANS3× · 2022–2024 · $75k · revenue +34%
- GIGOOD IN THE 'HOOD4× · 2021–2024 · $74k · revenue +28%
- NHNorthPoint Health and Wellness Center Inc4× · 2021–2024 · $68k · revenue +3%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $7k
- HHHAVEN HOUSINGone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -100%
- FWFISHING WITH VETSone grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +21%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Through shelter and housing, advocacy and supportive services, our mission is to prevent and end homelessness in our community.
The mn veterans pantry is committed to enhancing the lives of minnesota veterans by providing targeted financial support through grants exclusively for grocery and supply items. our current partnership with the minneapolis va medical…
Assisting families in shelters to gain more confidence in building future goals that will lead to success of the entire family.
Connecting people to affordable rental homes, increasing choice and access for all.
Swords to plowshares' mission is to heal the wounds of war, to restore dignity, hope and self-sufficiency to all veterans in need, and to significantly reduce homelessness and poverty among veterans.
Urban triage transforms culture, institutions, and communities to ensure a humane future.
My sister's place, inc. shelters, supports and empowers survivors of domestic violence and their children, while providing leadership and education to build a supportive community.
Humility homes and services, inc. is committed to ending homelessness by offering housing opportunities and supportive services in the greater quad cities area.
The successful transition of military veterans and their families through the provision of housing, counseling, career development and comprehensive support.
To honor the dignity, restore hope and create lasting change for homeless and those at risk in the green bay area.
The mission of mental health resources is to foster hope, health and recovery for people affected by mental illness and substance use disorder.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minnesota Assistance Council for Veterans and the most unlike its peers is Fishing for Life. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MINNESOTA ASSISTANCE COUNCIL FOR VETERANS ↗
- Who funds GOOD IN THE 'HOOD ↗
- Who funds NorthPoint Health and Wellness Center Inc ↗
- Who funds AGATE HOUSING & SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds MILITARY WARRIORS SUPPORT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA MILITARY FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds THE BRIDGE FOR YOUTH ↗
- Who funds SIMPSON HOUSING SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE 4 Youth ↗
- Who funds BIG SKY BRAVERY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WARRIORS & QUIET WATERS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds EVERY THIRD SATURDAY INC ↗
- Who funds UNION GOSPEL MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds My Very Own Bed ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds EVERY MEAL ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
- Who funds WAY TO GROW ↗
- Who funds OPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds SPANISH PEAKS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds FOOD GROUP MINNESOTA INC THE ↗
- Who funds Gallatin River Task Force ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Pohlad Family Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Walser Foundation · Catholic Community Foundation of Minnesota · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Head Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization 44 North Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to 44 North Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to 44 North Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.