· Public charity
Hunger Solutions Minnesota
HUNGER SOLUTIONS MINNESOTA is a comprehensive hunger relief organization that works to end hunger in minnesota.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 26 grants below total $254,001 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $7,939,021 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $7,685,020 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $34k
- $10k–50k21 grants · $220k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CAER | $14,969 |
| SECOND HARVEST NORTHERN LAKES FOOD BANK | $14,969 |
| FRONT AND CENTER INC | $10,000 |
| BECKER COUNTY FOOD PANTRY | $10,000 |
| WATONWAN COUNTY FOOD SHELF | $10,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES EMERGENCY SERVICES FOOD SHELF | $10,000 |
| COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER | $10,000 |
| BEMIDJI COMMUNITY FOOD SHELF | $10,000 |
| NEIGHBORS UNITED RESOURCE CENTER - YELLOW MEDICINE | $10,000 |
| COMUNIDADES LATINAS UNIDAS EN SERVICIO INC | $10,000 |
| THIEF RIVER FALLS AREA FOOD SHELF | $10,000 |
| BOIS FORTE COMMUNITY FOOD SHELF- NETT LAKE | $10,000 |
| RED WING AREA FOOD SHELF | $10,000 |
| LEECH LAKE BAND OF OJIBWE | $10,000 |
| GREAT PLAINS FOOD BANK | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $7.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
261 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2024, 235 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SHSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND3× · 2019–2021 · $1.2M · revenue +91%
- FGFOOD GROUP MINNESOTA INC THE3× · 2019–2021 · $758k · revenue +10%
- COCHANNEL ONE INC5× · 2019–2023 · $726k · revenue +56%
Funded once
- LSLOWER SIOUX INDIAN COMMUNITYone grant, 2022 · $415k
- MLMILLE LACS BAND OF OJIBWE INDIANSone grant, 2022 · $307k
- NINORTHWEST INDIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER NWICDCone grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue +2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The North Scott Food Pantry provides food for people in need. Clients receive enough food for about one week and are allowed to get food every 28 days. There were 721 visits to our food pantry in 2025.
Tc food justice is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization based in minneapolis, mn. since march 2016 we have been working with co-ops, grocery stores, and farmers markets to redistribute their unsellable foods to local hunger relief…
Provide emergency food for those in need.
Serve fresh and frozen meals to seniors, disabled and homebound individuals in central MN. Over 60,000 meals served annually to over 400 individuals.
food pantry
To provide food for people with low income within Faribault County.
tohelpfightfoodinsecurity.wereviveandgivedonatedfooditemstothoselessfortunate.
Local food pantry serving those food insecurity.
Provide food to those in need in the River Falls Community
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mcleod County Emergency Food Shelf and the most unlike its peers is A Place for Hope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
230 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 230 of the 393 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HUNGER SOLUTIONS MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
- Who funds FOOD GROUP MINNESOTA INC THE ↗
- Who funds CHANNEL ONE INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR ESSENTIAL NEEDS ↗
- Who funds THE OPEN DOOR ↗
- Who funds HOPE FOR THE COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds Family Pathways ↗
- Who funds Second Harvest Northland ↗
- Who funds GOOD IN THE 'HOOD ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN CUPBOARD EMERGENCY FOOD SHELF DBA OPEN CUPBOARD ↗
- Who funds VEAP Inc ↗
- Who funds Keystone Community Services ↗
- Who funds DIVISION OF INDIAN WORK ↗
- Who funds ARROWHEAD ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY AGENCY INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds EMERGENCY COMMUNITY HELP ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE SANNEH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNIDADES LATINAS UNIDAS EN SERVICO INC ↗
- Who funds EAST SIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PATHWAYS OF STEELE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN COMMUNITY HOUSING ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST INDIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER NWICDC ↗
- Who funds 360 Communities ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF ST CLOUD ↗
- Who funds WHITE BEAR AREA FOOD SHELF ↗
- Who funds Valley Outreach ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Open Your Heart to the Hungry and Homeless · Edina Realty Foundation · Food Group Minnesota Inc The · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Second Harvest Northland · Otto Bremer Trust · Foundation for Essential Needs · Land O'Lakes Foundation · Channel One Inc · Second Harvest North Central Food Bank · Mardag Foundation · North Country Food Bank Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hunger Solutions Minnesota funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hunger Solutions Minnesota?
Find your warmest path to Hunger Solutions Minnesota through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.