· Public charity
Open Your Heart to the Hungry and Homeless
Since 1986, OPEN YOUR HEART TO THE HUNGRY AND HOMELESS has worked to ensureevery minnesotan is free from hunger and homelessness.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 31 grants below total $345,997 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $521,739 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $175,742 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k24 grants · $166k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $80k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE FOOD GROUP | $100,000 |
| MINNEAPOLIS COLLEGE | $30,000 |
| MY NEIGHBOR TO LOVE COALITION | $10,000 |
| WILDFLYER COFFEE | $10,000 |
| HOPE 4 YOUTH | $10,000 |
| ST ANNE'S PLACE - PEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE | $10,000 |
| ALEXANDRA HOUSE INC | $10,000 |
| RUTH'S HOUSE OF HOPE | $9,811 |
| INTERFAITH ACTION OF GREATER SAINT PAUL | $9,195 |
| COMMUNITY BRIDGE | $9,000 |
| COMMUNITY EMERGENCY SERVICE (CES) | $8,160 |
| TOWER AREA FOOD SHELF | $8,000 |
| YOUTHWAY MINISTRIES | $7,000 |
| HOPE COALITION | $7,000 |
| THE OUTREACH PROGRAM OF BRAINERD LAKES | $7,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $468k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +64% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
53 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 36 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $189k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMINNEAPOLIS COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION4× · 2019–2024 · $120k · revenue +155%
- TLTHE LINK7× · 2017–2023 · $67k · revenue +124%
- LALOAVES AND FISHES TOO6× · 2017–2022 · $44k · revenue +866%
Funded once
- NONew Oil Christian Centerone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -16%
- CACARE AND SHARE INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $14k · revenue +131%
- LFLOAVES & FISHES HOUSING INCone grant, 2022 · $13k · revenue -46%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Family Pathways works alongside people to enhance lives through a continuum of essential services and, together with community, champions positive social change.
The Humanity Alliance is a Minnesota-based 501(c)(3) non-profit that aspires to create long-lasting community value. Our initial focus is on providing improved access to nutrition for those who are food insecure... restoring love and…
Provide food for hungry individuals in martin county, mn
Since 1986, open your heart to the hungry and homeless has worked to ensureevery minnesotan is free from hunger and homelessness. by partnering with organizations serving those in need, we grow donor engagement and raise awareness to…
Family Promise in Anoka County (FPAC) empowers families experiencing housing insecurity to build a foundation of lasting independence.
Minnesota engagement on shelter and housing's mission is to foster statewide partnerships and strengthen capacity to end homelessness. mesh helps regions, communities, and organizations develop strategic and customized solutions for ending…
A faith-based emergency shelter and crisis response ministry aimed at meeting the basic needs of food, shelter and clothing and transforming lives through the love of Jesus. Our mission is to serve people who are on the journey from…
Provide emergency food relief for the families in the Lonsdale MN region .
By utilizing and bringing together community resources the willmar area food shelf will provide food assistance to individuals and families. our goal is to insure no one goes hungry.
Provide emergency shelter for individuals who have become homeless, and a community meal program 7 days per week and social services case management and referrals as requested.
Crime and communities violence interve
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Loaves and Fishes Too and the most unlike its peers is Du Nord Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
112 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 112 of the 137 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HUNGER SOLUTIONS MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds MINNEAPOLIS COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOOD GROUP MINNESOTA INC THE ↗
- Who funds THE LINK ↗
- Who funds LOAVES AND FISHES TOO ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds THE BRIDGE FOR YOUTH ↗
- Who funds HOPE COALITION ↗
- Who funds CROSS (CHRISTIANS REACHING OUT IN SOCIAL SERVICES) ↗
- Who funds Partners for Affordable Housing ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY EMERGENCY SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds Southern Anoka Community Assistance ↗
- Who funds STEPPING STONE EMERGENCY HOUSING ↗
- Who funds AVENUES FOR YOUTH ↗
- Who funds THE OPEN DOOR ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATES AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE ↗
- Who funds SERVANTS OF SHELTER OF KOOCHICHING ↗
- Who funds AT HOME GROUP ↗
- Who funds RUTH'S HOUSE OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds RIVERS OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds OUR SAVIOUR'S COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds New Oil Christian Center ↗
- Who funds OPEN HANDS MIDWAY ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds OASIS CENTRAL MINNESOTA INC ↗
- Who funds Wildflyer Coffee ↗
- Who funds HASTINGS FAMILY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds WOMEN OF NATIONS ↗
- Who funds BI-COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE 4 Youth ↗
- Who funds WOMENS RURAL ADVOCACY PROGRAMS ↗
- Who funds ALEXANDRA HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN CUPBOARD EMERGENCY FOOD SHELF DBA OPEN CUPBOARD ↗
- Who funds VINEYARD COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Otto Bremer Trust · Hunger Solutions Minnesota · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Edina Realty Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Mardag Foundation · Pohlad Family Foundation · Allina Health System · Greater Twin Cities United Way · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Medica Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Open Your Heart to the Hungry and Homeless funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.