· Private foundation
Peace Shalom Foundation
Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k33 grants · $141k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $112k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNION GOSPEL MISSION | $24,500 |
| TEEN CHALLENGE | $21,000 |
| NEIGHBOR INC FOOD SHELF | $20,000 |
| CAMP VICTORY | $12,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $12,000 |
| CAMP JIM | $12,000 |
| GOOD IN THE HOOD | $10,000 |
| ICU MOBILE | $8,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $8,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $7,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $7,000 |
| HEALTH EAST (PILLARS) | $6,000 |
| AVENUES | $6,000 |
| PEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE | $6,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $243k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
41 repeat relationships — 39 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SHSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND6× · 2017–2022 · $198k · revenue +119%
- UGUNION GOSPEL MISSION INC6× · 2017–2022 · $116k · revenue +246%
- CJCAMP JIM INC6× · 2017–2022 · $73k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- MMATTERgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +173%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $3k
- AWALPHA WOMENS CENTERone grant, 2017 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To honor the dignity, restore hope and create lasting change for homeless and those at risk in the green bay area.
To care for the needy, share the good news of jesus christ and change lives by providing counseling, life skill training, dignity gained through work and christ-centered discipleship.
Assisting families in shelters to gain more confidence in building future goals that will lead to success of the entire family.
To end homelessness and relieve hunger through action and advocacy.
To grow disciples of jesus christ by ministering to and serving those in need while sharing god's hope, faith, and love, bringing them to a place of restoration and empowering them to become productive members of our society.
Through shelter and housing, advocacy and supportive services, our mission is to prevent and end homelessness in our community.
Hope ministries is one of the largest private providers of free meals, safe shelter, and comprehensive life-recovery support for homeless, near-homeless, and hungry men, women, and children in iowa. the mission of hope ministries is to…
Partners for Affordable Housing is missioned to provide shelter for homeless families and individuals and help them secure economically viable long term housing. The Organization owns and operates a number of scattered site housing…
Provide education, intervention and advocacy to those affected by relationship abuse with a holistic approach and anti-oppression focus.
Hope gospel mission exists to offer christ-centered, life changing help to the homeless and needy in western wisconsin.
See Schedule O.Established in 1895, Missions Inc. Programs is a multi-service non-profit organization with a long history of providing services to those who are most in need, each year offering thousands of people, whose lives have been…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is People Serving People Inc and the most unlike its peers is Chanarambie Christian Camps. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
- Who funds UNION GOSPEL MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP JIM INC ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds INTERCONGREGATION COMMUNITIES ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds GOOD IN THE 'HOOD ↗
- Who funds YOUTHLINK ↗
- Who funds METRO HOPE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE RESPONDING IN SOCIAL MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds The Dwelling Place ↗
- Who funds CHANARAMBIE CHRISTIAN CAMPS ↗
- Who funds GRINDSTONE LAKE BIBLE CAMP ↗
- Who funds FOREST SPRINGS CAMP AND CONFERENCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds IMAGE CLEAR ULTRASOUND INC ↗
- Who funds HAVEN HOUSING ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Land O'Lakes Foundation · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · Pohlad Family Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Food Group Minnesota Inc The
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Peace Shalom Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.