· Private foundation
Ron D Kline Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k31 grants · $310k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KING'S RANSOM FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK | $10,000 |
| HUMANE FARMING ASSOCIATION | $10,000 |
| SCHOOL ON WHEELS | $10,000 |
| MAULI OLA FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| PRO PUBLICA | $10,000 |
| LYMELIGHT FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| CLEAN OCEAN INTERNATIONAL | $10,000 |
| MOVE & GROVE FOR HEALTH | $10,000 |
| GOOD TIDINGS FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| WILDERNESS YOUTH PROJECT | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEAN | $10,000 |
| JAMESTOWN COMMUNITY CENTER | $10,000 |
| COMPASSION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL | $10,000 |
| ONE ACRE FUND | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $93k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 25% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
42 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FFFOOD FORWARD INC4× · 2021–2024 · $45k · revenue +52%
- TSTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION4× · 2021–2024 · $40k · revenue +7%
- OAONE ACRE FUND4× · 2021–2024 · $35k · revenue +3%
Funded once
- IIICAN - Informed Consent Action Networkone grant, 2023 · $20k
- CLChild Liberation Foundation Incgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue ×13
- BIBKS Iyengar Yoga Assocone grant, 2023 · $18k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Ccof advances organic agriculture for a healthy world. we accomplish our purpose through organic certification, education, advocacy and promotion. we envision a world where organic is the norm.
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
To research and develop healthy climate solutions comprising global food security, ecosystem regeneration and carbon balance in seas and soils.
California Coastkeeper Alliance unites Waterkeeper programs statewide to fight for swimmable, fishable, and drinkable waters for all Californians.
Ccof certification services, llc, a wholly owned subsidiary of california certified organic farmers inc., provides a wide array of cost-effective, organic certification programs. ccof certifies farm and livestock operations, processors,…
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…
Zero foodprint is mobilizing the food world around agricultural climate solutions. our work aims to create a circular economy that incentivizes practices that actively draw down carbon dioxide and offer our best hope of addressing the…
To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.
California ocean science trust (ost) is a non-profit organization dedicated to accelerating progress towards a healthy and productive ocean future for california. created by state legislation, ost bridges the gap between cutting-edge…
The mission of the California Farmland Trust is to help farmers protect the best farmland in the world.
Worldwide Opportunities on Organic Farms, USA (WWOOF-USA) is part of a worldwide effort to link visitors with organic farmers, promote an educational exchange, and build a global community conscious of ecological farming practices.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Defense Fund and the most unlike its peers is Mentor Tutor Connection. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD FORWARD INC ↗
- Who funds THE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RANCHO CIELO INC ↗
- Who funds PLANT-FOR-THE-PLANET US ↗
- Who funds KINGS RANSOM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ONE ACRE FUND ↗
- Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC ↗
- Who funds ACCESSURF HAWAII INC ↗
- Who funds LymeLight Foundation ↗
- Who funds SCHOOLS MENTORING AND RESOURCES TEAM INC (SMART) ↗
- Who funds CLEAN OCEANS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds THE WESTON A PRICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Charity United ↗
- Who funds CLEAN WATER FUND ↗
- Who funds JAMESTOWN COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds SCHOOL ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds WILDERNESS VOLUNTEERS GIVING SOMETHING BACK ↗
- Who funds HUMANE FARMING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ORGANIC FARMING RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Wilderness Youth Project Inc ↗
- Who funds WILDERNESS INQUIRY INC ↗
- Who funds VETERANS YOGA PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF YOGA THERAPISTS INC ↗
- Who funds Compassion Services International ↗
- Who funds Physicians for Informed Consent ↗
- Who funds Microbiome Research Inc ↗
- Who funds ORGANIC CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds GOOD TIDINGS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STEWARD AG FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VILLAGE HARVEST CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Child Liberation Foundation Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · Patagoniaorg · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Yelp Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · California Community Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Tides Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ron D Kline Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.