· Public charity
Alliance for Hope International
To create pathways to hope for women, children, and men who are survivors of domestic violence and related sexual assault and child abuse through collaborative, integrative centers, teams and initiatives.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $30,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $34,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $4,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HEALTHY MUSLIM FAMILIES | $6,000 |
| SAFE FUTURES INC | $6,000 |
| OPEN CLASP THEATRE | $6,000 |
| RAINBOW SERVICES LTD | $6,000 |
| PENN STATE HARRISBURG | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $380k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 43% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +139% since the first grant, against +64% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
FAMILY SAFETY CENTER INC4× · 2018–2021 · $192k · revenue +655%- NONEW ORLEANS FAMILY JUSTICE ALLIANCE4× · 2018–2021 · $186k · revenue +179%
- CWCLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES3× · 2018–2020 · $107k · revenue +264%
Funded once
- SISTEPSTONE INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +56%
- CCCUYAHOGA COUNTY FAMILY CTRone grant, 2022 · $10k
- SRSACRAMENTO REGIONAL FJC FNDone grant, 2022 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To end domestic violence in the capital area through serving victims of domestic violence, educating the public about domestic violence, and working to eliminate economic, social and cultural conditions and attitudes that contribute to…
The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.
Walk with people facing violence, offering safety, support, and hope as they heal and rebuild. with every step forward, we build stronger, more resilient communities.
Seek to stop family violence, make victims safer, hold batters accountable, and provide long-term support for survivors and children through collaboration and coordinated services. We will provide legal advice, medical services, and…
The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…
The Abuse Prevention Council provides emergency, advocacy, counseling, education and specialized services for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and homeless individuals and families.
Safehouse denver assists adult, children, and youth in reclaiming their right to a life free from domestic violence. the agency provides a broad spectrum of culturally competent, trauma-informed services, including but not limited to,…
Aid victims of domestic violence/assualt
Our mission is to provide compassionate support, resources, and advocacy for victims of violent crime. we are dedicated to empowering children, teens and adults in their journey to healing by offering a safe place, emotional care, and the…
A safe place is the leading advocate for eliminating domestic violence & human trafficking in northern illinois.
The women's resource center empowers survivors by providing trauma-informed services with equity and compassion while working collaboratively with the community to eliminate the root causes of interpersonal abuse.
The mission of SafeHouse Center is to empower survivors of both sexual and intimate partner violence by providing advocacy, support, and promoting social change within our community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center Against Sexual and Family Violence Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Hektoen Institute of Medicine. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FAMILY SAFETY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE HEKTOEN INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds NEW ORLEANS FAMILY JUSTICE ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds CLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES ↗
- Who funds SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds Safe Futures Inc ↗
- Who funds DENTON COUNTY FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY INC ↗
- Who funds Winged Hope Family Advocacy Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds SAFE NESTTEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR ↗
- Who funds Haven Hills Inc ↗
- Who funds SOJOURNER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Harbor House of Central Florida Inc ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds DURHAM CRISIS RESPONSE CENTER ↗
- Who funds CENTER AGAINST SEXUAL AND FAMILY VIOLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds Faith House Inc ↗
- Who funds Safe Alliance Inc ↗
- Who funds ONE PLACE METRO AL FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds FAMILY DYNAMICS RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds WOMEN & CHILDREN FIRST THE CENTER AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds STEPSTONE INC ↗
- Who funds HUBBARD HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds SACRAMENTO REGIONAL FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Bexar County Family Justice Center Foundation ↗
- Who funds HARRIS COUNTY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE COORDINATING COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SAFETY CENTER OF MEMPHIS AND SHELBY COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds JERSEY BATTERED WOMEN'S SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER FOUNDATION OF IDAHO INC ↗
- Who funds ROSE ANDOM CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Safe City Commission ↗
- Who funds TUBMAN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Mary Kay Ash Foundation · The Allstate Foundation · More Than a Phone Inc · The Gap Foundation · Texas Council on Family Violence Inc · United Animal Nations Dba Redrover · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Synchrony Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Alliance for Hope International funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Center for Family Justice Inc — 49% of income from government
- Hubbard House Inc — 42% of income from government
- Jersey Battered Women's Service Inc — 40% of income from government
- Clackamas Women's Services — 33% of income from government
- Harbor House of Central Florida Inc — 24% of income from government
- Safe Futures Inc — 15% of income from government
- Oklahoma City Family Justice Center Inc — 14% of income from government
- Domestic Violence Crisis Center — 10% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Alliance for Hope International?
Find your warmest path to Alliance for Hope International through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.