How much did REALITIES FOR CHILDREN CHARITIES grant in FY2025?

REALITIES FOR CHILDREN CHARITIES reported 26 grants totaling $900,728 in its FY2025 IRS filing.

Where is REALITIES FOR CHILDREN CHARITIES based?

REALITIES FOR CHILDREN CHARITIES is based in CO.

REALITIES FOR CHILDREN CHARITIES

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Community foundation

REALITIES FOR CHILDREN CHARITIES

REALITIES FOR CHILDREN CHARITIES inc is dedicated to serving the needs of abused and neglected children in larimer and weld counties.

$901k

Granted FY2025

Grants

Communities

$22k

Largest

01What you fund

0164% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.

Human Services$638kHealth$186kYouth Development$168kEducation$167kCrime & Legal$123kReligion$103kRecreation & Sports$72kOther$808k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

casesofferrangeplacementoffersbirthover

2019

placementoffersbirthoverroombabyadoption dreams

2020

young adultsbreaktraumaabuse neglectadvocatehealchildhood

2021

offerrangeadvocatetraumaabuse neglecthomelessnessexperienced

2022

placementoffersbirthoverroombabyadoption dreams

2023

grandfamiliesbelievetraumaabuse neglectadvocatehealexperienced

2024

placementoffersbirthoverroombabyadoption dreams

2025

placementoffersbirthoverroombabyadoption dreams

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k6 grants · $37k
$10k–50k20 grants · $299k

$13,000

Median grant

States reached

$7.5M

Total assets

Largest grants

PROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY$22,000
HEARTS & HORSES THERAPEUTIC RIDING$22,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF LARIMER COUNTY$18,999
FINALLY HOME FOUNDATION$18,000
POUDRE SCHOOL DISTRICT$16,944
LARIMER COUNTY DEPT OF HUMAN SERV$16,688
ALTERNATIVES TO VIOLENCE$15,986
THE FAMILY CENTERLA FAMILIA$15,945
FOSTER ADOPTIVE FAMILIES OF LARIMER$15,500
EVICS$15,000
SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN$14,967
NIGHTLIGHT CHRISTIAN ADOPTION$13,500
THE CENTER FOR FAMILY OUTREACH$13,000
PARTNERS$13,000
WELD COUNTY DEPT OF HUMAN SERVICES$12,271

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $625k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.2M · 32 repeat orgs$91k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +72% since the first grant, against +67% for the ones you funded once.

32 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.2M

$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%

+67%

Still filing today

78%

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesCrime & LegalHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

HH
HEARTS & HORSES THERAPEUTIC RIDING
9× · 2017–2025 · $150k · revenue +26%
FH
FINALLY HOME FOUNDATION
9× · 2017–2025 · $125k · revenue +220%
AT
ALTERNATIVES TO VIOLENCE
9× · 2017–2025 · $115k · revenue +167%

Funded once

RF
REALITIES FOR CHILDREN BOULDER COUN
one grant, 2020 · $28k · revenue -71%
TC
TIMBERLINE CHURCH
one grant, 2020 · $10k
3H
3 HOPEFUL HEARTSgraduated
one grant, 2024 · $7k · revenue +67%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Christian Family Care Agency Inc

The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on four pillars: preservation,…

Human Services

Impact Family Counseling

Provide comprehensive, faith-based counseling services to troubled youth and their families through the use of trained professional counselors, therapists, and volunteers.

Crime & Legal

Scan Inc

Scan protects children, prepares parents, strengthens families and educates our community to stop child abuse and neglect.

Human Services

New Mexico Child Advocacy Networks

Nmcan partners with young people to build community, promote equity and lead change.

—

The Christian Home for Children Inc

Christian Home for Children, also known as Family Life Services, facilitates life transformation for single moms and their children through faith-based community. This is accomplished through a resident program and a community outreach…

—

Center for Effective Life Transitions

Family Resource Center wherein we provide a variety of intervention services including Domestic Violence Prevention, Child Abuse Prevention treatment services, and Family Counseling. In addition we offer Re-Entry Services for prison…

Health

Arizona's Children Association

Providing child welfare and behavioral health services to arizona's children and families.

Human Services

Ach Child and Family Services

Protecting children and preserving families.

—

Children's Village Family Service

To provide permanent support for the activities and programs of the Village Family Service Center.

Human Services

New Priorities Family Services

Crime & Legal

Active Community Health Center of

We are and Agency created on the fundamental value that strengthening one family at a time will transform our community as a whole. we believe that all people should have access to behavioral healt servicesa and to live a fulfilling life.…

—

Sacramento Children's Home

Provider of child abuse prevention, intervention and treatment services.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safe Families for Children Alliance and the most unlike its peers is Family Housing Network of Fort Collins. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/40

the rest of the field

11%

208/1,827

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

32 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

30/32

Grantees still filing

25/32

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$807,981Human Services$637,536Health$185,596Youth Development$167,658Education$167,288Crime & Legal$122,508Religion$102,829Recreation & Sports$72,480

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of NorthernCO57.5× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Northern · Otter Cares Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · United Way of Larimer County · Northern Colorado United for Youth · El Pomar Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · The Food Bank for Larimer County · Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · Ray Foundation · United Way of Weld County Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation REALITIES FOR CHILDREN CHARITIES funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: GRAND FAMILIES COALITION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 474545674 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on GRAND FAMILIES COALITION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 49% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Realities for Children Charities?

Find your warmest path to Realities for Children Charities through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

REALITIES FOR CHILDREN CHARITIES

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

32 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Realities for Children Charities?

More from the funding graph

REALITIES FOR CHILDREN CHARITIES

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

32 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Realities for Children Charities?

More from the funding graph