· Private foundation
Jaburg and Wilk Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k12 grants · $34k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $33k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SARRC | $20,000 |
| Valley Beit Midrash | $12,500 |
| Sounds Academy | $5,000 |
| UMOM New Day Centers | $5,000 |
| Foster Alliance | $5,000 |
| Midwest Family Food Bank | $5,000 |
| Phoenix Convservatory of Music | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| Feeding Matters | $2,500 |
| Gabriel's Angels | $1,500 |
| Swift Youth Foundation | $1,000 |
| Cancer Support Community | $750 |
| R R Ranch AZ | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
28 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SASOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER8× · 2017–2024 · $153k · revenue +138%
- VBVALLEY BEIT MIDRASH8× · 2017–2024 · $100k · revenue +135%
- NINOAH INC5× · 2019–2023 · $23k · revenue +137%
Funded once
- FPFIRST PLACE AZgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +89%
- SVSOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS TUCSONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +128%
- DMDesert Mission Food Bankone grant, 2020 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…
The mission of arizona's children association is to protect children, empower youth, and strengthen families.
To provide children and youth in arizona a safe environment, free from abuse and neglect, by creating strong and successful families.
Honorhealth's mission is to improve the health and well-being of those we serve.
We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.
The mission of fresh start women's foundation is to provide access and resources that help women achieve self-sufficiency and use their strength to thrive. we do this work in pursuit of our vision to create unlimited opportunities for…
We are committed to improving and assisting the successful transition of at-risk young people to independent adulthood and supporting resilient families, by connecting them to resources.
Foster360 equips former clients of the foster care system to break the cycle of homelessness and abuse.
Free arts for abused children of arizona (free arts) is a nonprofit organization that transforms children's trauma to resilience through the arts. since 1993, free arts has served more than 155,400 children in maricopa county in arizona.…
Codac provides tools, support and services to individuals, families, and communities so they may live with dignity, free from the harmful effects of mental illness, substance use disorders and trauma.
The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on three pillars: preserve,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is First Place Az and the most unlike its peers is Noah Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 30% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds VALLEY BEIT MIDRASH ↗
- Who funds FEEDING MATTERS INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST PLACE AZ ↗
- Who funds NOAH INC ↗
- Who funds Phoenix Children's Hospital ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN IN NEED FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Hope Ignites Phoenix ↗
- Who funds PHOENIX CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC ↗
- Who funds SWIFT YOUTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GABRIELS ANGELS INC ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS TUCSON ↗
- Who funds SOUNDS ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds RYAN HOUSE ↗
- Who funds LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL ARIZONA SHELTER SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds AUDREY'S ANGELS ↗
- Who funds UMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds SCOTTSDALE TRAINING & REHABILITATION SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds VALLEY OF THE SUN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOSTER ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Cancer Support Community Arizona ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Thunderbirds Charities · American Express Foundation · Jaburg Family Foundation Inc · The Board of Visitors · John F Long Foundation Inc · Valley of the Sun United Way · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Phoenix · Marco Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jaburg and Wilk Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Jaburg and Wilk Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Jaburg and Wilk Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.