Loading…
Loading…
California · Nonprofit
COMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS (California) is funded by 14 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $6,215,562 in grants to it, the largest being ESSENTIAL ACCESS HEALTH ($2,701,445). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
COMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 3,322 health nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,322 health nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
Government-grant reliance: 2024 6%. Grants only — government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
7% of COMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (7% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
$175k from 1 funders in 2025, up from $291k and 4 in 2017.
1 of 14 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 21% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of COMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 13 of 14 funders by total. Association, not causation.
COMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 43% of grant income and the top three 89%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 72% · 2018 72% · 2019 68% · 2020 58% · 2021 52% · 2022 38% · 2023 62% · 2024 53% · 2025 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
20% of COMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 43% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
COMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS is locally rooted: 98% of its grant income comes from California funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 14 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $35.9M on record.
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
78% of spending goes to programs.
Operates in 1 state
Part of a family of 1 related entity
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 14funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing