Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Valley Presbyterian Hospital

To improve the quality of health in the san fernando valley.

$966k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$64k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$2.7MHuman Services$176kFood & Nutrition$129kCommunity Improvement$80kHousing & Shelter$58kArts & Culture$5k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $167,900 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $965,942 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $798,042 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $76k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $64k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$600M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHEAST VALLEY HEALTH$63,800
EISNER HEALTH$25,600
VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE$20,000
OVARIAN CANCER COALITION OF GREATER CALIFORNIA$15,000
EYES OF A MOTHER$15,000
ONE GENERATION$8,500
PARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION$7,500
MID VALLEY FAMILY YMCA$6,500
BARLOW FOUNDATION$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $182k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $35k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $13k → 14%MID VALLEY FAMILY YMCA: $30k → 14%MID VALLEY FAMILY YMCA: $13k → 14%Mid Valley Family YMCA: $10k → 14%MID VALLEY FAMILY YMCA: $10k → 14%MID VALLEY FAMILY YMCA: $7k → 14%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $6k → 14%HOPE THE MISSION: $15k → 14%NORTH VALLEY CARING SERVICES: $6k → 14%MEND: $20k → 14%MEND - MEET EACH NEED WITH DIGNITY: $10k → 14%SAN FERNANDO VALLEY RESCUE MISSION: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.0M · 12 repeat orgs$194k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
18

Total granted

$3.0M
$166k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+39%

Still filing today

92%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterEnvironmentSocial ScienceOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NORTHEAST VALLEY HEALTH CORPORATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $359k · revenue +72%
  • PEDIATRIC AND FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER DBA EISNER HEALTH
    6× · 2018–2024 · $292k · revenue +71%
  • VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE
    6× · 2017–2024 · $135k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • EN
    EL NIDO FAMILY CENTERSgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +39%
  • HT
    HOPE THE MISSIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +74%
  • SF
    San Fernando Valley Community Mental Health Center Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +20%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
East Valley Community Health Center Inc

East valley community health center's mission is to provide access to excellent health care while engaging and empowering our patients, employees and partners to improve their well-being and health of our communities.

—
2
San Fernando Community Hospital

Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.

Health
3
Venice Family Clinic

To provide quality primary health care to people in need.

Health
4
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
5
Via Care Community Health Center

Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.

Health
6
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
7
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
8
Saint Agnes Medical Center

We, saint agnes medical center and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. saint agnes medical center is a member of trinity health.

Health
9
United Health Centers of the San Joaquin

The organization is committed to the lifetime wellness of the communities by providing accessible, comprehensive quality health care to everyone with compassion and respect, regardless of ability to pay.

Health
10
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
11
La Clinica Del Valle Family Health Care Center Inc

La clinica provides primary and preventive medical, dental, behavioral health, and other health promotion services to underserved and low-income patients.

—
12
Family Health Care Centers of Greater Los Angeles

Family health care centers of greater los angeles aims to enchance the quality of life for men, women, and children in the greater los angeles through the provision of high quality, accessible and affordable health care services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Valley Community Healthcare and the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health CentersAffordable Senior HousingChild Care and Family Servi…Vulnerable Population Suppo…Policy Advocacy & ResearchLocal Business Chambers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%3%<5yr16%7%5–10yr20%3%10–20yr17%24%20–35yr10%41%35–55yr12%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%0%<5yr16%2%5–10yr20%1%10–20yr17%9%20–35yr10%26%35–55yr12%62%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/34
the rest of the field
16%
7,867/49,782

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/30
Grantees still filing
25/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VALLEY PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $1,802,178 · OtherVALLEY PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION+12 more — $193,311 · Other+12 moreNORTHEAST VALLEY HEALTH CORPORATION — $358,550 · HealthNORTHEAST VALLEY HEALTH CORPORA…PEDIATRIC AND FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER DBA EISNER HEALTH — $292,100 · HealthPEDIATRIC AND FAMILY MEDICAL CE…VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE — $134,750 · HealthVALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTHCARENATIONAL OVARIAN CANCER COALITION INC — $35,000 · Health+8 more — $66,500 · Health+8 moreYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles — $123,048 · Human ServicesMEND - Meet Each Need With Dignity — $30,000 · Human ServicesHOPE THE MISSION — $15,000 · Human ServicesRESCUE MISSION ALLIANCE — $8,000 · Human Services+1 more — $5,500 · Human ServicesOVARIAN CANCER COALITION OF GREATER CALIFORNIA — $45,000 · Public Safety & DisasterSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $40,000 · EnvironmentTHE VALLEY ECONOMIC ALLIANCE — $13,833 · Social Science
Other$1,995,489Health$886,900Human Services$181,548Public Safety & Disaster$45,000Environment$40,000Social Science$13,833

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVALLEY PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $1,802,178 over 2y, 50% of budgetNORTHEAST VALLEY HEALTH CORPORATION — $358,550 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPEDIATRIC AND FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER DBA EISNER HEALTH — $292,100 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetVALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE — $134,750 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles — $123,048 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetONEGENERATION — $58,775 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetOVARIAN CANCER COALITION OF GREATER CALIFORNIA — $45,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION — $35,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL OVARIAN CANCER COALITION INC — $35,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMEND - Meet Each Need With Dignity — $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEL NIDO FAMILY CENTERS — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE THE MISSION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VALLEY ECONOMIC ALLIANCE — $13,833 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSan Fernando Valley Community Mental Health Center Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTARZANA TREATMENT CENTERS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FERNANDO VALLEY CANCER FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetVALLEY INDUSTRY & COMMERCE ASSOCIATION — $9,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGREATER SAN FERNANDO VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $9,236 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetRESCUE MISSION ALLIANCE — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHRYSALIS CENTER — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBarlow Foundation — $6,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetNORTH VALLEY CARING SERVICES — $5,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEl Centro De Amistad Inc — $5,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community …The Ralph M Parsons F…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Weingart FoundationCedars-Sinai Medical …The Ahmanson Foundati…Providence Health Sys…Shelter Partnership I…The Annenberg Foundat…Los Angeles Regional …Baby2babyDignity Health
California Community FoundationCA28.2× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Weingart Foundation · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · The Ahmanson Foundation · Providence Health System - So California · Shelter Partnership Inc · The Annenberg Foundation · Los Angeles Regional Food Bank · Baby2baby · Dignity Health

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Valley Presbyterian Hospital funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines