· Public charity
Inner Sunset Community Advocates Inc
Isca's mission is to empower marginalized people to improve the quality of their lives and communities and to create transformation in the san francisco bay area by fostering affordable housing and making grants to qualified 501(c)(3) organizations.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ON LOK DAY SERVICES | $30,000 |
| SEVENTH AVENUE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH | $27,000 |
| OPENHOUSE | $25,000 |
| FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH | $25,000 |
| AT THE CROSSROADS | $20,000 |
| RAPHAEL HOUSE | $20,000 |
| FREEDOM COMMUNITY CLINIC | $20,000 |
| GUM MOON WOMEN'S RESIDENCE | $20,000 |
| MUJERES UNIDAS & ACTIVAS | $20,000 |
| FAITHFUL FOOLS STREET MINISTRY | $15,000 |
| KIDS & ART FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| POTRERO HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE | $10,000 |
| COMMUNITY LIVING CAMPAIGN | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $360k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CLCommunity Living Campaign6× · 2018–2024 · $101k · revenue +180%
- EBEAST BAY COMMUNITY LAW CENTER4× · 2017–2021 · $100k · revenue +57%
- OLON LOK DAY SERVICES4× · 2020–2024 · $95k · revenue +65%
Funded once
GRANTMAKERS CONCERNED WITH IMMIGRANTS AND REFUGEESone grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -23%- 3S3RD STREET YOUTH CENTER AND CLINICgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +66%
- NCNew College for Advanced Christian Studiesone grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +6%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco is dedicated to combating the displacement crisis gripping our city by building the power of working-class tenants of color to take on the real estate industry and win housing justice for all.…
To provide services to seniors that promote independent living while maintaining their dignity and self-esteem.
Our core belief at San Francisco Community Health Center is that everyone deserves to be healthy and needs access to the highest quality health care. Our mission is to transform lives by advancing health, wellness and equality.
We empower individuals, families, and seniors to achieve wellness, stability, and independence through culturally-competent care.
Hospitality House is a progressive, community-based organization located in San Francisco's Tenderloin, Sixth Street Corridor, and Mid-Market neighborhoods, founded nearly 60 years ago in 1967 by community volunteers during the City's…
The Organization is a citywide collaborative of housing counseling agencies that helps diverse and underserved households achieve and sustain homeownership in San Francisco.
The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.
Senior & Disability Action educates and mobilizes seniors and people with disabilities to secure individual rights and social justice. We work together to create a city and world in which seniors and people with disabilities can live well…
To provide direct mental health services, psychotherapy, and counseling to homeless families in San Francisco, CA and in particular to children of such families, to provide referral services for such families and their children to other…
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
Community Forward SF's support services create pathways from crisis to long-term stability through our Women's Wellness Pathway, a proven continuum linking a 24/7 drop-in center, shelter, transitional housing, behavioral health care, and…
Improve the quality of life for individuals in Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Solano County, Monterey County, Sacramento County and the surrounding area in the State of California.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Self-Help for the Elderly and the most unlike its peers is Womens Division Christian Service Gum Moon Residence Hall. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Community Living Campaign ↗
- Who funds EAST BAY COMMUNITY LAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds ON LOK DAY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Eldergivers dba Art With Elders ↗
- Who funds NON-PROFIT HOUSING ASSOCIATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH ↗
- Who funds AT THE CROSSROADS ↗
- Who funds San Francisco Arts Education Project ↗
- Who funds SELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY ↗
- Who funds Peninsula Food Runners Inc ↗
- Who funds Kids & Art Foundation ↗
- Who funds Mujeres Unidas y Activas ↗
- Who funds POTRERO HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds RAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC ↗
- Who funds FAITHFUL FOOLS STREET MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds Pangea Legal Services ↗
- Who funds GRANTMAKERS CONCERNED WITH IMMIGRANTS AND REFUGEES ↗
- Who funds Openhouse ↗
- Who funds NIGHT MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds HAMILTON FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds 3RD STREET YOUTH CENTER AND CLINIC ↗
- Who funds Womens Division Christian Service Gum Moon Residence Hall ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM COMMUNITY CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds New College for Advanced Christian Studies ↗
- Who funds Freedom for Immigrants ↗
- Who funds Dorothy Day House ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds CHINATOWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds NORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Project Open Hand ↗
- Who funds FAMILY EMERGENCY SHELTER COALITION ↗
- Who funds Bayview Hunters Point Multipurpose Senior Services Inc ↗
- Who funds FAMILY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds CHINESE HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Stupski Foundation · United Way of the Bay Area · The James Irvine Foundation · Crankstart Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Metta Fund · Tipping Point Community · Bothin Foundation · Marin Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Inner Sunset Community Advocates Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Inner Sunset Community Advocates Inc?
Find your warmest path to Inner Sunset Community Advocates Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.