Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Sunset Heights Assn Responsible People

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$79k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$69kEnvironment$69kArts & Culture$57kRecreation & Sports$52kFood & Nutrition$42kHealth$35kCrime & Legal$34kEducation$28kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$636k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES$5,000
STOP CRIME$5,000
EMPOWER ME ACADEMY$5,000
WAH MEI SCHOOL$5,000
SF CHINESE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$5,000
SUNSET YOUTH SERVICES$5,000
ON LOK$3,500
Individual grant recipient$3,000
INNER SUNSET PARK NEIGHBORS$3,000
EARTH ISLAND INST FOR GARDEN 4 THE$3,000
MOONSTAR CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION$3,000
CHINESE HOSPITAL AUXILIARY$3,000
FAMILY BUILDERS BY ADOPTION$3,000
KID STOCK$3,000
HOOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL PTO$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%FAMILY BUILDERS BY ADOPTION: $3k → 10%City Youth Now: $6k → 10%CITY YOUTH NOW: $4k → 10%CITY YOUTH NOW: $4k → 10%City Youth Now: $3k → 10%Project Night Night: $3k → 10%CHILDREN'S BOOK PROJECT: $4k → 10%PROJECT NIGHT NIGHT: $1k → 10%EPIPHANY CENTER: $3k → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAM: $3k → 10%POMEROY RECREATION REHABILITATION C: $2k → 10%SELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY: $4k → 10%SELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY: $3k → 10%CHILDREN'S BOOK PROJECT: $3k → 10%Central American Resource Center: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$348k · 36 repeat orgs$175k to everyone else

36 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
44

Total granted

$348k
$131k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+32%

Still filing today

44%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
    6× · 2018–2024 · $26k · revenue +4%
  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK
    7× · 2017–2024 · $24k · revenue +74%
  • CY
    CITY YOUTH NOW FKA VOLUNTEER AUXILIARY YOUTH GUIDANCE CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO
    4× · 2017–2020 · $17k · revenue +94%

Funded once

  • GS
    Good Samaritan Family Resource Center of San Franciscograduated
    one grant, 2020 · $7k · revenue +30%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne
Recreation & Sports
2
Parents for Public Schools of San Francisco

PPS-SF's mission is to promote the fundamental value of public education and pursue the success of every public school by sharing knowledge, bridging communities, and informing policy.

3
San Francisco Filipino Cultural Center
Arts & Culture
4
Homeownership San Francisco dba Home Sf

The Organization is a citywide collaborative of housing counseling agencies that helps diverse and underserved households achieve and sustain homeownership in San Francisco.

5
San Francisco Public Press

The mission of the San Francisco Public Press is to enrich civic life by publishing investigative and solutions journalism that engages diverse audiences and promotes public accountability. The San Francisco Public Press…

Education
6
San Francisco Casa

San Francisco CASA transforms the lives of children and youth traumatized and displaced in the foster care and related systems by providing one consistent, caring volunteer advocate, trained to address each childs needs in the court and…

Civil Rights
7
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
8
Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco Inc

The Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco is dedicated to combating the displacement crisis gripping our city by building the power of working-class tenants of color to take on the real estate industry and win housing justice for all.…

Education
9
Telegraph Hill Neighborhood Association

Telegraph Hill Neighborhood Center's mission is to provide opportunities for the individuals and families in the North Beach, Chinatown,Fisherman's wharf and Mission Bay neighborhoods to enrich their quality of life.

Community Improvement
10
Homeless Childrens Network

To provide direct mental health services, psychotherapy, and counseling to homeless families in San Francisco, CA and in particular to children of such families, to provide referral services for such families and their children to other…

Human Services
11
Children's Council of San Francisco

By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…

Human Services
12
San Francisco City Guides

Since 1978, our mission has been to preserve and perpetuate San Francisco's history and folklore and to celebrate its rich history of cultural diversity.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central American Resource Center and the most unlike its peers is Community Youth Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySenior Affordable HousingK-12 Schools and Early Chil…Chinese Family Benevolent A…School Parent-Teacher Organ…Immigrant Legal ServicesBay Area Performing Arts Pr…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%2%<5yr14%10%5–10yr18%15%10–20yr19%33%20–35yr16%21%35–55yr13%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%1%<5yr14%9%5–10yr18%17%10–20yr19%32%20–35yr16%12%35–55yr13%29%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/53
the rest of the field
11%
694/6,373

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 95 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/48
Grantees still filing
34/48
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK — $23,700 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANKNATURE IN THE CITY — $23,000 · OtherNATURE IN THE CITYGGHNA — $14,200 · OtherSUNSET YOUTH SERVICES — $12,200 · OtherGood Samaritan Family Resource Cent — $11,900 · Other+64 more — $252,500 · Other+64 moreCALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES — $26,000 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA ACA…GOLDEN GATE PHILHARMONIC — $16,800 · Arts & CultureGOLDEN GATE PH…WESTERN NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT — $11,500 · Arts & CultureWESTERN NEIGHB…HIP HOP FOR CHANGE INC — $4,200 · Arts & CultureHIP HOP FOR CH…CHINESE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA — $3,500 · Arts & CultureCHINESE HISTOR…KID STOCK INC — $3,000 · Arts & CultureCITY YOUTH NOW FKA VOLUNTEER AUXILIARY YOUTH GUIDANCE CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO — $16,700 · Human ServicesCITY YOUTH…CHILDREN'S BOOK PROJECT — $6,500 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S…SELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY — $6,500 · Human ServicesSELF-HELP …PROJECT NIGHT NIGHT — $3,500 · Human ServicesPROJECT NI…Mount St Joseph-St Elizabeth — $3,200 · Human ServicesMount St J…CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER — $3,000 · Human ServicesCENTRAL AM…Family Builders by Adoption — $3,000 · Human ServicesFamily Bui…HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC — $2,500 · Human ServicesPomeroy Recreation and Rehabilitation Center — $2,000 · Human Services+1 more — $300 · Human ServicesSAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE — $16,300 · Recreation & SportsEmpower Me Academy — $5,000 · Recreation & SportsYOUTH TENNIS ADVANTAGE — $2,500 · Recreation & SportsON LOK INC — $10,500 · HealthHomeless Prenatal Program Inc — $4,200 · HealthFAMILY HOUSE INC — $4,000 · HealthCHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION — $1,500 · HealthSTOP CRIME SF — $13,000 · Crime & LegalPangea Legal Services — $4,200 · Crime & LegalCommunity Living Campaign — $12,100 · Civil Rights
Other$337,500Arts & Culture$65,000Human Services$47,200Recreation & Sports$23,800Health$20,200Crime & Legal$17,200Civil Rights$12,100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES — $26,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK — $23,700 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGOLDEN GATE PHILHARMONIC — $16,800 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetCITY YOUTH NOW FKA VOLUNTEER AUXILIARY YOUTH GUIDANCE CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO — $16,700 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE — $16,300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSTOP CRIME SF — $13,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetCommunity Living Campaign — $12,100 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWESTERN NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT — $11,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetON LOK INC — $10,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGood Samaritan Family Resource Center of San Francisco — $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S BOOK PROJECT — $6,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY — $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOWER CALIFORNIA — $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWAH MEI SCHOOL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMISSION LANGUAGE AND VOCATIONAL SCHOOL INC — $4,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPangea Legal Services — $4,200 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHomeless Prenatal Program Inc — $4,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREDWOOD CREDIT UNION COMMUNITY FUND INC — $4,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIP HOP FOR CHANGE INC — $4,200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFoodwise Community — $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY HOUSE INC — $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK — $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT NIGHT NIGHT — $3,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHINESE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA — $3,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLava Mae — $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMount St Joseph-St Elizabeth — $3,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOONSTAR CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION — $3,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetKID STOCK INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHEALTHRIGHT 360 — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Builders by Adoption — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH TENNIS ADVANTAGE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFriends of SCRAP Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBay Area Community Services Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHINATOWN PHOTOGRAPHIC SOCIETY — $2,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetFriends of the School of the Arts Fnd — $2,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSan Bruno Mountain Watch — $2,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPomeroy Recreation and Rehabilitation Center — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJefferson Elementary PTA — $1,800 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetYES IN MY BACK YARD — $1,700 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLA COCINA — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION ACTION INC — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK
  • Who funds GOLDEN GATE PHILHARMONIC
  • Who funds CITY YOUTH NOW FKA VOLUNTEER AUXILIARY YOUTH GUIDANCE CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE
  • Who funds STOP CRIME SF
  • Who funds Community Living Campaign
  • Who funds WESTERN NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT
  • Who funds ON LOK INC
  • Who funds Good Samaritan Family Resource Center of San Francisco
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S BOOK PROJECT
  • Who funds SELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY
  • Who funds POWER CALIFORNIA
  • Who funds Empower Me Academy
  • Who funds WAH MEI SCHOOL
  • Who funds MISSION LANGUAGE AND VOCATIONAL SCHOOL INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco FoundationCA42.3× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · San Francisco Association of Realtors Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Metta Fund · Crankstart Foundation · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · Raymond and Joanne Lin Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sunset Heights Assn Responsible People funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sunset Heights Assn Responsible People?

    Find your warmest path to Sunset Heights Assn Responsible People through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 95 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph