· Public charity
INDYGIVE DBA Give Pikes Peak
Give Pikes Peak builds community philanthropy in the Pikes Peak Region by providing regional nonprofits with shared fundraising infrastructure, visibility, training, and matching support to increase donor engagement and organizational capacity.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 49 grants below total $745,713 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $803,796 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $58,083 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k20 grants · $154k
- $10k–50k29 grants · $591k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Happy Cats Haven | $47,918 |
| Westside CARES | $33,517 |
| Rocky Mtn Field Institute | $33,343 |
| New Horizons Band of CS | $32,703 |
| All Breed Rescue & Training | $28,784 |
| Trails & Open Space Coalition | $25,505 |
| Manitou Art Center | $25,063 |
| Harleys Hope Foundation | $24,985 |
| Look what the Cat Brought In | $22,176 |
| TESSA | $20,877 |
| Millibo Art Theatre | $20,642 |
| NAMI-Colorado Springs | $19,957 |
| Springs Ensemble Theatre | $19,833 |
| Mustang Ambassador Program | $19,369 |
| Friends of Monument Valley Pa | $17,738 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
104 repeat relationships — 44 still active in FY2025, 60 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RMRocky Mountain Field Institute Inc7× · 2019–2025 · $370k · revenue +7%
- HCHAPPY CATS HAVEN INC7× · 2019–2025 · $292k · revenue +81%
- NANATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS - COLORADO SPRINGS7× · 2019–2025 · $222k · revenue +132%
Funded once
- CCCONCRETE COUCHone grant, 2020 · $21k · revenue +17%
- SCSAVE CHEYENNEone grant, 2019 · $19k
- MIMAKE IT A HOMEone grant, 2023 · $18k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation is to promote the health and well-being of physicians and physician assistants through evaluation, treatment referral, support education and research.
The Center for Nonprofit Excellence strengthens Southern Colorado's nonprofit sector through leadership and resource development, advocacy and collaboration. Together, with our partners, we are co-creating a vibrant community in the Pikes…
Colorado Artists in Recovery utilizes recovery-oriented principles to provide a safe, encouraging, and inclusive environment for people affected by substance use and mental health. Through our workshops and events we nurture their creative…
Colorado Springs Convention and Visitors Bureau's, now doing business as Visit Colorado Springs (VCOS), primary exempt purpose is promotion of the Pikes Peak Region. VCOS is designed to stimulate the visitor industry in the Pikes Peak…
Promote the general interest of daily, weekly, and monthly newspapers and online publications, improve editorials and business methods of daily and weekly newspapers, and advance those newspapers' usefulness and influence in the public…
Working to ensure that Downtown Colorado Springs serves as the economic, civic, and cultural heart of Colorado Springs.
The Pinon Project Family Resource Center strengthens our community by providing comprehensive services for children and families.
Recovery from addiction is a process of gaining sobriety and contributing to one's family and community as a healthy productive person. AFRC provides peer coach mentoring to individuals in recovery from substance use disorders.
Colorado Thrives exists to support Coloradans to achieve economic mobility through access to good jobs.
To offer compassionate care to animals, support safe communities, and provide socially conscious sheltering. (continued on schedule o)
Step Springs is a subsidiary organization of Step Denver and when it opens in 2025 will be the first replication of the Step program. Step is a residential recovery community that gives men with nowhere else to turn the opportunity to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Energy Resource Center and the most unlike its peers is Ballet Folklorico De Barajas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
134 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 134 of the 146 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Rocky Mountain Field Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds HAPPY CATS HAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds Trails and Open Space Coalition ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS - COLORADO SPRINGS ↗
- Who funds COLORADO SPRINGS ALL BREED RESCUE ↗
- Who funds ONE NATION WALKING TOGETHER ↗
- Who funds WESTSIDE CARES INC ↗
- Who funds TESSA ↗
- Who funds INSIDE OUT YOUTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE NEW HORIZONS BAND OF COLORADO SPRINGS ↗
- Who funds HARLEYS HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Place ↗
- Who funds MANITOU ART CENTER ↗
- Who funds MANITOU ART THEATRE ↗
- Who funds CASA of the Pikes Peak Region ↗
- Who funds SAFE PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds Peak Education ↗
- Who funds WILLIAM J PALMER PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BLACKPACKERS ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF MONUMENT VALLEY PARK INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD TO POWER (FKA COLORADO SPRINGS FOOD RESCUE) ↗
- Who funds ENERGY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds FELINE RESCUE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds TRI-LAKES CARES ↗
- Who funds Paws N Hooves ↗
- Who funds SPRINGS ENSEMBLE THEATRE ↗
- Who funds The Catamount Institute ↗
- Who funds Court Care for the Pikes Peak Region Inc ↗
- Who funds SUICIDE PREVENTION PARTNERSHIP-PIKES PEA ↗
- Who funds THE ARC PIKES PEAK REGION ↗
- Who funds COLORADO SPRINGS CHILDREN'S CHORALE ↗
- Who funds Medicine Wheel Trail Advocates Inc ↗
- Who funds Colorado Springs Youth Symphony Association ↗
- Who funds FOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN HEALING NETWORK dba Mission Medical Center ↗
- Who funds Rocky Mountain Womens Film Institute ↗
- Who funds THE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds ORMAO DANCE COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds Community Coalition for Families and Children ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Pikes Peak Community Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Colorado Springs Health Foundation · The Joseph Henry Edmondson Foundation · The Myron Stratton Home · Pikes Peak United Way · The Hester E & Edwin W Giddings Foundation · Bee Vradenburg Foundation · Colorado Springs Osteopathic Foundation · Luther T McCauley Charitable Trust Xxxxx3001 · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Marson Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization INDYGIVE DBA Give Pikes Peak funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc — 46% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to INDYGIVE DBA Give Pikes Peak?
Find your warmest path to INDYGIVE DBA Give Pikes Peak through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.