· Public charity
Peyback Foundation Inc
To promote the future success of disadvantaged youth by assisting programs that provide the necessary leadership and growth opportunities for youth who are at risk
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PROJECT SANCTUARY | $20,000 |
| COALITION FOR KIDS INC | $20,000 |
| THE INDEPENDENCE FUND | $15,000 |
| NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| KEDILA FAMILY LEARNING CENTER | $10,000 |
| YMCA OF NW LOUISIANA | $10,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHWEST LOUISIANA | $10,000 |
| COLORADO SPORTS HALL OF FAME | $10,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PUEBLO COUNTY | $10,000 |
| GIRLS INC OF MEMPHIS | $10,000 |
| A'S & ACES | $10,000 |
| TIME TO RISE | $10,000 |
| CRESCENT CITY SCHOOLS | $10,000 |
| YOUTH VILLAGES - WEST TENNESSEE | $10,000 |
| A KID AGAIN | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $588k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.
69 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2024, 40 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SVST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC2× · 2019–2021 · $203k · revenue +108%
- CLChildren's Literacy Center Inc6× · 2018–2024 · $75k · revenue +55%
- NSNATIONAL SPORTS CENTER FOR THE DISABLED INC5× · 2017–2023 · $75k · revenue +59%
Funded once
- INISIDORE NEWMAN SCHOOLone grant, 2021 · $700k · revenue +17%
GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $525k · revenue +45%- NYNew York Universitygraduatedone grant, 2021 · $525k · revenue +30%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
With love and respect, we partner with opportunity youth to build the skillsets and mindsets that lead to lifelong learning, livelihood, and leadership. youthbuild strives to create a world where all young people are seen for their…
Springboard collaborative combines targeted student instruction with parent training in an incentivized system that closes the literacy gap, by transferring the summer from a barrier into a springboard for financially disadvantaged…
Junior achievement - rocky mountain, inc. (ja) is critical for inspiring and preparing young people to own their economic success. in partnership with business and educators, ja immerses students in disruptive, real-world experiences,…
The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…
City year helps students and schools succeed, while preparing the next generation of civically engaged leaders who can work across lines of difference. partnering with teachers, teams of city year americorps members cultivate learning…
The mission of Communities In Schools is to surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.
Ascend College Prep is a public high school for 10-12th grade students in Colorado Springs and the surrounding area. Our Mission is to "Prepare and inspire students to become lifelong learners and responsible citizens through rigorous…
The colorado children's campaign relentlessly champions the needs of children. we leverage data, research, and relationships to unapologetically advocate for kids, fighting for a brighter, more equitable future for every child in colorado.…
The mission of colorado youth for a change (cyc) is to address barriers to learning by providing individualized support throughout pivotal stages of students' education journeys.
Youth & opportunity united, inc. is a not-for-profit, youth development agency that provides services and leadership to meet the emerging needs of young people and their families in our community. y.o.u. programs are trauma-informed,…
Cincinnati Youth Collaborative ("CYC") empowers young people to overcome barriers and excel in education, career, and life.
Teens, inc. supports, educates, and empowers youth and their families to make healthy choices and thrive.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sos Outreach and the most unlike its peers is New York University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
131 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 131 of the 135 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ISIDORE NEWMAN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN UNIVERTY SYSTEM ↗
- Who funds FISK UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds XAVIER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA ↗
- Who funds DILLARD UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds A Sanctuary for Military Families Inc DBA Project Sanctuary ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds The Independence Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds START THE ADVENTURE IN READING INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Literacy Center Inc ↗
- Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL SPORTS CENTER FOR THE DISABLED INC ↗
- Who funds COLORADO UPLIFT INC ↗
- Who funds LARIMER COUNTY PARTNERS DBA PARTNERS MENTORING YOUTH ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Pueblo County ↗
- Who funds THE PEER POWER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH REBUILDING NEW ORLEANS ↗
- Who funds LOOP NOLA ↗
- Who funds BACKFIELD IN MOTION ↗
- Who funds EMERALD YOUTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NORTHWEST LOUISIANA INC ↗
- Who funds SAVE OUR YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds A PRECIOUS CHILD INC ↗
- Who funds KENT DENVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds ART STUDENTS LEAGUE OF DENVER ↗
- Who funds READING PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds Community Works of Louisiana Inc ↗
- Who funds SOARING EAGLES CENTER FOR AUTISM ↗
- Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds THAT OTHERS MAY LIVE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AS & ACES ↗
- Who funds WESLEY HOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER CO ↗
- Who funds TIME TO RISE INC ↗
- Who funds Rural Resources ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · Adolph Coors Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · The Denver Children's Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Caring for Colorado Foundation · The Greater New Orleans Foundation · Denver Broncos Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Peyback Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Peyback Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Peyback Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.