Utah · Nonprofit
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVIS
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVIS (Utah) receives grants from 35 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,060,694 to it, the largest being BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA (GROUP RETURN) ($468,765). 19 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2025
- $4.2M
- Funders on record
- 35
- Grants received
- $2.1M
- Net assets
- $3.8M
What Boys & Girls Clubs of Weber-Davis does
Mission
To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, and caring citizens.
As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.
Program
Serve members in the community through community outreach activities.
$3,353,657 spent100% of program spending
The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $3,353,657.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $1.7M to $2.8M (+66%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2017 40% · 2018 39% · 2019 41% · 2020 44% · 2021 57% · 2022 48% · 2023 62% · 2024 66% · 2025 52%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
82% of BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVIS’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (82% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 5 funders to 11 funders, grant income rose $306k → $371k.
9 of 35 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 15% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVIS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 35 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVIS has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 23% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left
59% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVIS.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 76% · 2018 64% · 2019 56% · 2020 70% · 2021 40% · 2022 29% · 2023 38% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
43% of BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVIS's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 54% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
51% of BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVIS's grant income comes from Utah funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $306k arriving through sponsors registered in 9 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVIS holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 1,152 youth development nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,152 youth development nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025
Government funding BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVIS receives
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $18k on record.
- National Endowment for the Arts$18k
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Organizations like BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVIS
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Utah
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
90% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
89%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVIS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVIS?
- BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVIS (Utah) receives grants from 35 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,060,694 to it, the largest being BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA (GROUP RETURN) ($468,765). 19 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVIS have?
- IRS filings report 35 organizations giving $2,060,694 in grants to BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVIS, 19 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVIS?
- BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA (GROUP RETURN) is the largest funder on record, with $468,765 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVIS find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Utah. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
Play a game about who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Weber-Davis →
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 35 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing