· Public charity
Wasatch Peaks Foundation
To assist organizations that benefit the communities in which Wasatch Peaks operates.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $209,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $416,938 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $207,938 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $88k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $105k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Ogden School Foundation | $55,250 |
| Weber School Foundation | $50,000 |
| Trails Foundation Northern Utah | $37,500 |
| United Way of Northern Utah | $12,500 |
| OTECH Foundation | $12,500 |
| Ogden Dinosaur Park | $12,500 |
| Box Elder School Foundation | $12,500 |
| Boys and Girls Club of Weber-Davis | $8,750 |
| Weber Human Services | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To serve as a catalyst for quality job growth and increased capital investment in the state.
Provide academic growth to students of San Juan County Utah School District by promoting, sponsoring and carrying out educational, scientific, charitable and related activities and objectives with the San Juan County School District.
Canyons School District Education Foundation works in tandem with community and business partners to build support for public schools and to advance Canyons School Districts mission to help every student become college- and career-ready…
To support the Tooele School District in education, literacy, and charitable purposes.
Provide support to the University of Utah Growth Capital Partners Foundation in Charitable, Educational and Scientific purposes.
To provide resources and financial support to meet the unique need of the children and families served by the Utah Schools for the Deaf and Blind (USDB).
To promote cross country skiing, snow-biking and snowshoeing in Northern Utah through world class grooming, dedicated volunteers, trails planning, construction and maintenance, all levels of instruction and friendly social gatherings.
The webster groves district foundation is dedicated to a tradition of academic excellence by expanding dynamic learning opportrunites that impact student success
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ogden School Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Weber Pathways. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OGDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Weber County School District Foundation ↗
- Who funds WEBER PATHWAYS ↗
- Who funds Box Elder School District Foundation ↗
- Who funds OGDEN DINOSAUR PARK AND MUSEUM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHERN UTAH ↗
- Who funds OGDEN - WEBER TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVIS ↗
- Who funds WEBER HUMAN SERVICES FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donnell B & Elizabeth D Stewart Education Foundation · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · The Alan and Jeanne Hall Foundation · Ascent Credit Union Foundation · United Way of Northern Utah · Pacificorp Foundation Aka Pacific Power Foundation Aka Rocky Mountain Power Foundati · Msl Family Foundation · Beaver Creek Foundation · Wadman Foundation · Ihc Health Services Inc · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Wasatch Peaks Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.