Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Stockel Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$678k
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.

Environment$1.4MHealth$703kHousing & Shelter$381kHuman Services$365kArts & Culture$261kInternational$179kEducation$152kPhilanthropy$85kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $288k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $370k
$25,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRAND CANYON TRUST$105,000
HEALTH IN HARMONY$100,000
MONGABAYORG$65,000
NATURE & CULTURE INTERNATIONAL$50,000
RAINFOREST FOUNDATION US$50,000
PHOENIX CONSERVANCY$35,000
ATLANTA CHILDRENS SHELTER$31,000
NORTH FULTON COMMUNITY CHARITIES$30,000
THE DRAKE HOUSE INC$30,000
PHOENIX CONSERVANCY$30,000
CHEERFUL HELPERS CHILD & FAMILY STUDY$25,000
HORIZONS ATLANTA$25,000
THEATRE FOR A NEW AUDIENCE$25,000
CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER KEEPER$16,000
CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION$10,870
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $265k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LOST-N-FOUND YOUTH INC: $25k → 13%NORTH FULTON COMMUNITY CHARITIES: $30k → 13%NORTH FULTON COMMUNITY CHARITIES: $30k → 13%NORTH FULTON COMMUNITY CHARITIES: $30k → 13%NORTH FULTON COMMUNITY CHARITIES: $20k → 13%NORTH FULTON COMMUNITY CHARITIES: $20k → 13%NORTH FULTON COMMUNITY CHARITIES INC: $10k → 13%CHILDRENS BUREAU OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $50k → 14%CHILDRENS BUREAU OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
OR
CA
VA
AZ
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of Stockel Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Stockel Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.3% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.1M · 23 repeat orgs$221k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +66% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
13

Total granted

$3.1M
$193k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+20%

Still filing today

96%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentHealthAnimalsHuman ServicesArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HI
    Health in Harmony
    5× · 2020–2024 · $280k · revenue +230%
  • TG
    THE GRAND CANYON TRUST INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $248k · revenue +123%
  • TD
    The Drake House Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $210k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • CH
    CHILDRENS HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC - CHILDRENS HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA
    one grant, 2019 · $35k
  • AC
    ATLANTA CHILDREN'S DAY SHELTER
    one grant, 2023 · $35k
  • OP
    OPEN PATHS COUNSELING CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue +89%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
2
Natural Areas Conservancy Inc

The natural areas conservancy champions urban natural areas in new york city and across the nation through innovative research, partnerships, and advocacy. we increase the health and resilience of urban forests and wetlands, catalyze…

Environment
3
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
4
Amazon Conservation Association

Amazon conservation unites science, people, and innovation to protect the amazon - the greatest wild forest on earth. as guardians of the most iconic forest on the planet, we bring together the power of the latest science and technology…

Environment
5
Wildlife Conservation Network Inc

Connect conservationists and supporters, deploy resources to the field, provide conservationists with tools and support they need to succeed.

Animals
6
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
7
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation

The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.

Animals
8
African Parks Foundation of America

To engage the united states and its citizens in the work of african parks and to promote access to american experience and expertise in the african parks actiities by 1) raising funds for specific projects, activities, training, equipment…

Recreation & Sports
9
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
10
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
11
Wildearth Guardians

Wildearth guardians works to protect and restore the wildlife, wild places, wild rivers, and health of the american west.

Unclassified
12
Amazon Watch Inc

To protect the rainforest and advance the rights of Indigenous peoples in the Amazon Basin. We partner with Indigenous communities in campaigns for human rights, corporate accountability, and the preservation of the Amazon Basin's…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of the Los Angeles River and the most unlike its peers is Cheerful Helpers Child and Family Study Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLand Conservation Organizat…Community Arts OrganizationsEnvironmental Advocacy Orga…Wildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Animal Rescue and AdoptionFood Pantries & AssistanceSubstance Abuse TreatmentEarly Childhood Education C…Child and Family ServicesCommunity Health Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%27%10–20yr16%32%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr16%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr16%38%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%11%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/35
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,530

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
24/34
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE GRAND CANYON TRUST INC — $248,000 · EnvironmentTHE GRAND CANYON TRUST INCRAINFOREST FOUNDATION INC — $206,280 · EnvironmentRAINFOREST FOUNDATION INCPHOENIX CONSERVANCY — $180,300 · EnvironmentPHOENIX CONSERVANCYMONGABAY ORG CORP — $180,000 · EnvironmentMONGABAY ORG CORPNATURE AND CULTURE INTERNATIONAL — $134,950 · EnvironmentNATURE AND CULTURE INTERNATIONALCHATTAHOOCHEE RIVERKEEPER INC — $80,150 · EnvironmentCHATTAHOOCHEE RIVERKEEPER INC+4 more — $30,000 · EnvironmentHealth in Harmony — $279,725 · HealthHealth in HarmonyCHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE — $225,000 · HealthCHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTEVENICE FAMILY CLINIC — $173,000 · HealthVENICE FAMILY CLINICCHEERFUL HELPERS CHILD AND FAMILY STUDY CENTER INC — $130,000 · HealthCHEERFUL HELPERS CHILD AND FA…SAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION — $110,000 · HealthSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FO…+1 more — $30,000 · HealthThe Drake House Inc — $210,200 · Housing & ShelterThe Drake H…ATLANTA CHILDREN'S SHELTER INCORPORATED — $145,900 · Housing & ShelterATLANTA CHI…THEATRE FOR A NEW AUDIENCE INC — $160,000 · Arts & Culture24th Street Theatre Company — $100,500 · Arts & CultureCLIMATE MUSEUM — $25,000 · Arts & CultureNORTH FULTON COMMUNITY CHARITIES INC — $140,000 · Human ServicesALL FOR KIDS ORGANIZATION — $100,000 · Human ServicesLost-N-Found Youth Inc — $25,000 · Human ServicesCHEERFUL HELPERS CHILD & FAMILY STUDY — $90,000 · OtherCHEERFUL HELPERS…CHILDRENS HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC - CHILDRENS HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA — $35,000 · OtherCHILDRENS HEALTH…ATLANTA CHILDREN'S DAY SHELTER — $35,000 · OtherATLANTA CHILDREN…HORIZONS ATLANTA INC — $152,000 · OtherHORIZONS ATLANTA…SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $85,000 · OtherSOCIAL GOOD FUND…ACATE AMAZON CONSERVATION INC — $62,500 · OtherACATE AMAZON CON…FOOD FORWARD INC — $25,000 · OtherCITIZENS FOR LOS ANGELES WILDLIFE INC — $20,000 · Other+10 more — $33,000 · Other+10 moreCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $179,012 · Philanthropy
Environment$1,059,680Health$947,725Housing & Shelter$356,100Arts & Culture$285,500Human Services$265,000Other$537,500Philanthropy$179,012

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHealth in Harmony — $279,725 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetTHE GRAND CANYON TRUST INC — $248,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetCHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE — $225,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetThe Drake House Inc — $210,200 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetRAINFOREST FOUNDATION INC — $206,280 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetPHOENIX CONSERVANCY — $180,300 over 5y, 22% of budgetMONGABAY ORG CORP — $180,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $179,012 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC — $173,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHEATRE FOR A NEW AUDIENCE INC — $160,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetHORIZONS ATLANTA INC — $152,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetATLANTA CHILDREN'S SHELTER INCORPORATED — $145,900 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetNORTH FULTON COMMUNITY CHARITIES INC — $140,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetNATURE AND CULTURE INTERNATIONAL — $134,950 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCHEERFUL HELPERS CHILD AND FAMILY STUDY CENTER INC — $130,000 over 3y, 7.6% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION — $110,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget24th Street Theatre Company — $100,500 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetALL FOR KIDS ORGANIZATION — $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $85,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHATTAHOOCHEE RIVERKEEPER INC — $80,150 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetACATE AMAZON CONSERVATION INC — $62,500 over 4y, 32% of budgetOPEN PATHS COUNSELING CENTER — $30,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetCLIMATE MUSEUM — $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFOOD FORWARD INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLost-N-Found Youth Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCITIZENS FOR LOS ANGELES WILDLIFE INC — $20,000 over 4y, 28% of budgetBeyond Pesticides — $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWILDCARE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHEODORE PAYNE FOUNDATION FOR WILD FLOWERS AND NATIVE PLANTS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE LOS ANGELES RIVER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAtlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFURKIDS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community …The Ahmanson Foundati…The Annenberg Foundat…Francis and Christine…Gs Donor Advised Phil…The Ralph M Parsons F…Weingart FoundationMarin Community Found…American Endowment Fo…Texas Instruments Fou…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…
California Community FoundationCA20.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Francis and Christine Martin Family Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Stockel Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Stockel Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Stockel Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines