· Private foundation
Frost Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $110k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $850k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LAHAINA COMMUNITY LAND TRUST | $1,075,000 |
| PARLEY FOR THE OCEANS | $100,000 |
| REALIZE IMPACT | $100,000 |
| MAUI HUB | $100,000 |
| CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY | $100,000 |
| NATIVE HAWAIIAN LEGAL CORP | $100,000 |
| HONOLULU CIVIL BEAT INC | $75,000 |
| SUSTAINABLE COASTLINES HAWAII | $75,000 |
| RESOURCES LEGACY FUND | $75,000 |
| HOOLA NA PUA | $75,000 |
| AINA MOMONA | $50,000 |
| HAWAII ASSOCIATION FOR INFANT | $25,000 |
| PAIA YOUTH AND CULTURAL CENTER | $25,000 |
| HOIWAI FUND | $25,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MAUI | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $170k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $245k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SCSUSTAINABLE COASTLINES HAWAI'I6× · 2020–2025 · $565k · revenue +27%
- HAHAWAII ALLIANCE FOR PROGRESSIVE ACTION4× · 2020–2023 · $290k · revenue +184% · 30% of their budget
Center for Food Safety5× · 2020–2025 · $275k · revenue +86%
Funded once
- NCNATIONAL COALITION FOR COMMUNITYone grant, 2021 · $100k
- FFFARMERS FOOTPRINTone grant, 2021 · $100k
- KOKAKOO OIWIgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +30%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Protecting and promoting the marine biodiversity of Hawai'i through coral restoration, ecological monitoring, regenerative tourism, and cultural integration
Our mission is to protect, perpetuate, and enhance the cultural and natural landscape of the kiholo bay area through collaborative management and active community stewardship.
Our mission is to uplift the collective of aina (land), community, and culture, and preserve ancestral knowledge by reconnecting people to the land. we do this through indigenous grassroots initiatives, sustainable agriculture, and…
To re-establish the systems that sustain our community through educational initiatives and land-based practices that cultivate abundance, regenerate responsibilities, and promote collective health and well being.
Papahana kuaola's mission is to create quality educational programs focused on environmental restoration and economic sustainability fully integrated with hawaiian knowledge in order to exemplify a lifestyle respectful of kanaka, `aina,…
The mission of Kipuka Kuleana Inc. is to perpetuate ahupuaa (traditional Hawaiian land division) based natural resource management & connection to place through protection and care of cultural landscapes and family lands. Kipuka Kuleana…
To preserve the immediate and long-term health and wellbeing of lahaina's diverse communities and precious natural resources.
Improve the environmental, social & economic well-being of the kilauea community and kauai by developing county of kauai land into a community garden,individual farming plots, farmers market & other facilities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lahaina Community Land Trust and the most unlike its peers is Conservation International Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 24% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LAHAINA COMMUNITY LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds SUSTAINABLE COASTLINES HAWAI'I ↗
- Who funds HAWAII ALLIANCE FOR PROGRESSIVE ACTION ↗
- Who funds Center for Food Safety ↗
- Who funds HAWAII INVESTMENT READY ↗
- Who funds Beyond Pesticides ↗
- Who funds HO'OLA NA PUA ↗
- Who funds ELEMENTAL EXCELERATOR INC ↗
- Who funds Honolulu Civil Beat Inc ↗
- Who funds KOKUA KALIHI VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Friends of Auwahi Forest Restoration Project ↗
- Who funds NATIVE HAWAIIAN LEGAL CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds PARLEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOIWAI FUND ↗
- Who funds PURPLE MAIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AINA MOMONA ↗
- Who funds ZERO WASTE HAWAII ↗
- Who funds MAUI HUB ↗
- Who funds RESOURCES LEGACY FUND ↗
- Who funds KAKOO OIWI ↗
- Who funds Realize Impact ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC BIRTH COLLECTIVE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds HAWAII INSTITUTE OF PACIFIC AGRICULTURE ↗
- Who funds WAIANAE COMMUNITY RE-DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds PA'IA YOUTH COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOLANI HANA INC ↗
- Who funds THE KOHALA CENTER ↗
- Who funds HAWAII PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Atherton Family Foundation · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Trustees of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop Dba Kamehameha Schools · Stupski Foundation · Cooke Foundation Limited · Bank of Hawaii Charitable Fdn · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc · Nuestro Futuro Inc · Hmsa Foundation · Kosasa Foundation · Council for Native Hawaiian Advancement · Aloha United Way Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Frost Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Frost Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Frost Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.