Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Moxley Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$970k
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.

Education$780kReligion$737kHuman Services$720kFood & Nutrition$550kArts & Culture$425kHealth$333kInternational$325kPublic Safety & Disaster$80kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $375k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $265k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$20,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Crossroads United Methodist Church$300,000
The University of Texas Foundation$60,000
Western Fairfax Christian Ministries$55,000
John F Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts$50,000
Marine Military Academy$50,000
The Cornucopia Institute$50,000
The Chris Atwood Foundation$40,000
Northern Virginia Family Service$35,000
Water Project Inc$30,000
Doctors Without Borders$30,000
Travis Mills Foundation$25,000
World Central Kitchen Inc$25,000
The Trevor Project$25,000
The Marine Corps Heritage Foundation$20,000
OrganicEye$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $785k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Langley Residential Support Services: $10k → 6%The Marine Corps Heritage Foundation: $40k → 7%Boulder Crest Foundation: $10k → 7%Langley Residential Support Services: $10k → 6%The Marine Corps Heritage Foundation: $40k → 7%Boulder Crest Foundation: $5k → 7%Langley Residential Support Services: $10k → 6%The Marine Corps Heritage Foundation: $40k → 7%Langley Residential Support Services: $10k → 6%The Marine Corps Heritage Foundation: $40k → 7%Langley Residential Support Services: $10k → 6%The Marine Corps Heritage Foundation: $40k → 7%Langley Residential Support Services: $5k → 6%The Marine Corps Heritage Foundation: $20k → 7%Third Option Foundation: $10k → 6%Northern Virginia Family Service: $35k → 7%Third Option Foundation: $10k → 6%Northern Virginia Family Service: $35k → 7%Third Option Foundation: $10k → 6%Northern Virginia Family Service: $35k → 7%Third Option Foundation: $10k → 6%Northern Virginia Family Service: $30k → 7%Third Option Foundation: $10k → 6%Northern Virginia Family Service: $30k → 7%Western Fairfax Christian Ministries: $55k → 6%Northern Virginia Family Service: $25k → 7%Western Fairfax Christian Ministries: $55k → 6%Western Fairfax Christian Ministries: $55k → 6%Western Fairfax Christian Ministries: $35k → 6%Western Fairfax Christian Ministries: $30k → 6%Western Fairfax Christian Ministries: $25k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
MN
WI
NY
OR
CA
WV
VA
NC
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.9M · 28 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
4

Total granted

$3.9M
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+39%

Still filing today

93%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalEducationFood & NutritionCivil RightsHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $425k · revenue +55%
  • MM
    MARINE MILITARY ACADEMY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $300k · revenue +8%
  • WF
    Western Fairfax Christian Ministries
    6× · 2020–2025 · $255k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • TA
    Texas A&M University - Kingsville Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +43%
  • FE
    Future Economy Collective
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -63%
  • PU
    PENDER UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Veterans Legal Services Program Inc

To provide at no cost legal assistance to veterans of the u.s. armed forces and current service members.

—
2
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
3
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
4
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
5
World Coffee Research

World coffee research unites the global coffee industry to drive science-based agricultural solutions to urgently secure a diverse and sustainable supply of quality coffee today and for generations to come. our mission is to grow, protect,…

International
6
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
7
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
8
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
9
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

—
10
Center for a New American Security Inc

The mission of the Center for a New American Security (CNAS) is to develop strong, pragmatic and principled national security and defense policies building on the the expertise and experience of its staff and advisors. CNAS engages policy…

International
11
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
12
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPublic University Foundatio…Urban Agriculture & Food Ac…Food Pantries & AssistanceSouth Asian Cultural and Sp…Lgbtq+ Community CentersCommunity Health CentersHomeless Services & ShelterDevelopmental Disabilities …Substance Abuse TreatmentVeteran Support ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…Land Conservation Organizat…Community Arts OrganizationsIndependent K-8 SchoolsClassical Music Ensembles
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%32%35–55yr16%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%33%35–55yr16%21%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/36
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,529

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
26/34
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CROSSROADS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $727,000 · OtherCROSSROADS UNITED METHODIST CHURCHTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC — $160,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INCTexas A&M Kingsville Foundation — $80,000 · OtherTexas A&M Kingsville FoundationNational Coalition for the Homeless — $50,000 · OtherTRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION — $145,000 · OtherTRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATIONTREVOR PROJECT INC — $120,000 · OtherTREVOR PROJECT INC+11 more — $185,000 · Other+11 moreWestern Fairfax Christian Ministries — $255,000 · Human ServicesWestern Fairfax Chris…MARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $220,000 · Human ServicesMARINE CORPS HERITAGE…NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES INC — $190,000 · Human ServicesNORTHERN VIRGINIA FAM…LANGLEY RESIDENTIAL SUPPORT SERVICES INC — $55,000 · Human ServicesLANGLEY RESIDENTIAL S…THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Human ServicesTHIRD OPTION FOUNDATI…+1 more — $15,000 · Human ServicesMARINE MILITARY ACADEMY INC — $300,000 · EducationMARINE MILITAR…Flint Hill School — $220,000 · EducationFlint Hill Sch…Texas A&M University - Kingsville Foundation Inc — $20,000 · EducationJOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS — $425,000 · Arts & CultureJOHN F KENN…THE WATER PROJECT INC — $180,000 · InternationalTHE WATER P…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $95,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SA…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $80,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTR…International Rescue Committee INC — $25,000 · InternationalInternation…AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID — $25,000 · InternationalAMERICAN NE…THE CORNUCOPIA INSTITUTE INC — $210,000 · Food & NutritionORGANICEYE INC — $80,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more — $5,000 · Food & NutritionTHE CHRIS ATWOOD FOUNDATION INC — $180,000 · HealthSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND — $40,000 · HealthSTOP SOLDIER SUICIDE INC — $27,500 · Health
Other$1,467,000Human Services$785,000Education$540,000Arts & Culture$425,000International$405,000Food & Nutrition$295,000Health$247,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS — $425,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMARINE MILITARY ACADEMY INC — $300,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetWestern Fairfax Christian Ministries — $255,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetFlint Hill School — $220,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $220,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CORNUCOPIA INSTITUTE INC — $210,000 over 6y, 7.1% of budgetNORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES INC — $190,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WATER PROJECT INC — $180,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CHRIS ATWOOD FOUNDATION INC — $180,000 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC — $160,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION — $145,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC — $120,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $95,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $80,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetORGANICEYE INC — $80,000 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetLANGLEY RESIDENTIAL SUPPORT SERVICES INC — $55,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetNational Coalition for the Homeless — $50,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetTHIRD OPTION FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND — $40,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBeyond Pesticides — $40,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetXERCES SOCIETY INC — $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTOP SOLDIER SUICIDE INC — $27,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCIA OFFICERS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTexas A&M University - Kingsville Foundation Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOULDER CREST FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFuture Economy Collective — $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAPPALACHIAN TRAIL CONSERVANCY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…Dominion Energy Chari…Vanguard Charitable E…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…The Blackbaud Giving …Network for GoodAmerican Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Paypal Charitable Giv…The Bank of America C…
The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia IncVA13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Moxley Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Xerces Society Inc — 22% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines