Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Arthur L Bud Johnson in Memory of Elaine V Johnson Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
37
Grants FY2024still arriving
20
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0166% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2024.

Animals$1.9MEnvironment$1.4MHuman Services$1.0MEducation$185kRecreation & Sports$172kScience & Tech$50kArts & Culture$40kPublic Benefit$35kOther$2.5M
02FY2024 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k24 grants · $564k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $761k
$28,898
Median grant
20
States reached
$9.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SEMPERVIRENS FUND$100,000
ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI$100,000
AMERICAN ASSN OF ZOOLOGICAL PARKS$100,000
THE SEEING EYE INC$100,000
GORILLA REHABILITATION AND CONS EDU$88,157
ARIZONA CENTER FOR NATURE$62,700
VOICE OF ASIAN ELEPHANTS SOCIETY$60,000
NATURAL LAND INSTITUTE$50,000
BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL$50,000
ATLANTA-FULTON COUNTY ZOO$50,000
TURTLE CONSERVANCY$44,821
NORTH CAROLINA AQUARIUM SOCIETY$40,000
GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND$35,000
GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND$35,000
DESERT BOTANICAL GARDEN$32,632
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $943k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $35k → 8%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $51k → 9%FREEDOM GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $48k → 16%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $118k → 10%KSDS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $100k → 10%OCCUPAWS GUIDE DOG ASSOCIATION: $13k → 10%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $50k → 8%INTERNATIONAL HEARING DOG INC: $35k → 10%SUMMIT ASSISTANCE DOGS: $60k → 11%THE SEEING EYE INC: $100k → 4%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $30k → 8%CANINE COMPANIONS: $50k → 11%FREEDOM GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $40k → 16%THE OCCUPAWS GUIDE DOG ASSOCIATION: $8k → 10%INTERNATIONAL HEARING DOG INC: $15k → 10%SUMMIT ASSISTANCE DOGS: $50k → 11%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $41k → 9%FREEDOM GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $20k → 16%INTERNATIONAL HEARING DOG INC: $10k → 10%OCCUPAWS GUIDE DOG ASSOCIATION: $5k → 10%INTERNATIONAL HEARING DOG INC: $10k → 10%INTERNATIONAL HEARING DOG INC: $10k → 10%INTERNATIONAL GUIDING EYES INC: $10k → 14%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $35k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
ID
MT
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
NJ
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.8M · 56 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against +42% for the ones you funded once.

56 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2024, 30 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

56
40

Total granted

$5.8M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+42%

Still filing today

88%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $290k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEnvironmentHuman ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SEMPERVIRENS FUND
    5× · 2020–2024 · $285k · revenue +61%
  • NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION
    3× · 2020–2023 · $239k · revenue +108%
  • TS
    THE SEEING EYE INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $200k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • SG
    Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $118k · revenue +24%
  • KA
    KSDS ASSISTANCE DOGS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +38%
  • ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $96k · revenue +84%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
2
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
3
Cascadia Wildlands

Cascadia wildlands defends and restores cacasia's wild ecosystems in the forests,in the courts, and in the streets. we envision vast old-growth forests, rivers full of wild salmon, wolves howling in the backcountry, a stable climate, and…

Environment
4
Defenders of Wildlife

Defenders of Wildlife is a national, nonprofit membership organization dedicated to the protection of all native animals and plants in their natural communities.

Animals
5
Wildlife Conservation Society

The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

Animals
6
The Wildlife Society

The wildlife society's mission is to inspire, empower, and enable wildlife professionals to sustain wildlife populations and habitats through science-based management and conservation.

Animals
7
Lincoln Park Zoological Society

Lincoln park zoo is dedicated to connecting people with nature by providing a free, family-oriented wildlife experience in the heart of chicago and by advancing the highest quality of animal care, horticulture, education, science and…

Animals
8
Conservation Society of California

Through management of oakland zoo, the conservation society of california deepens connection with animals, saves wildlife, and inspires champions for the natural world.

Animals
9
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
10
San Francisco Zoological Society

To connect all people with wildlife, inspire caring for nature, and advance conservation action.

Animals
11
Wildlands Trust Inc

The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…

Environment
12
Zoological Society of San Diego

San diego zoo wildlife alliance is committed to saving species worldwide by uniting our expertise in wildlife care and conservation science with our dedication to inspiring passion for nature.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wildlife Conservation Network Inc and the most unlike its peers is Monarch Research Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and ShelterPolicy Research and AdvocacyEnvironmental Conservation …Community College Foundatio…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%32%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr13%31%35–55yr16%32%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/87
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,478

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

87 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 87 of the 107 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
23
Early backer (in before they grew)
87/87
Grantees still filing
68/87
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ASSOCIATION OF ZOOS AND A — $800,000 · OtherASSOCIATION OF ZOOS AND AARIZONA CENTER FOR NATURE — $382,856 · OtherARIZONA CENTER FOR NATUREGORILLA REHABILITATION AND CONS EDU — $321,118 · OtherGORILLA REHABILITATION AND CONS EDUTHE PEREGRINE FUND INC — $125,000 · OtherAMERICAN ASSN OF ZOOLOGICAL PARKS — $100,000 · OtherINTL CENTER FOR PRES OF WILD ANIMAL — $85,237 · Other+30 more — $729,270 · Other+30 moreNEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION — $239,178 · AnimalsNEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATI…SANTA BARBARA ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION — $194,000 · AnimalsSANTA BARBARA ZOOLOGICAL FOUND…WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC — $159,662 · AnimalsWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK …VOICE FOR ASIAN ELEPHANTS SOCIETY — $157,500 · AnimalsVOICE FOR ASIAN ELEPHANTS SOCI…THE NORTH CAROLINA AQUARIUM SOCIETY — $140,000 · AnimalsTHE NORTH CAROLINA AQUARIUM SO…ATLANTA FULTON COUNTY ZOO INC — $115,000 · AnimalsATLANTA FULTON COUNTY ZOO INCZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI — $110,000 · AnimalsZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNA…BIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA — $103,330 · AnimalsBIG LIFE FOUNDATION USAFRIENDS OF TRACY AVIARY — $69,900 · Animals+23 more — $647,884 · Animals+23 moreSEMPERVIRENS FUND — $285,000 · EnvironmentSEMPERVIRENS FUNDNATURAL LAND INSTITUTE — $150,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL LAND INSTITUT…DESERT BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $125,948 · EnvironmentDESERT BOTANICAL GARD…NAPA COUNTY LAND TRUST — $96,000 · EnvironmentNAPA COUNTY LAND TRUS…INDIANA FOREST ALLIANCE INC — $90,000 · EnvironmentINDIANA FOREST ALLIAN…LANDMARK CONSERVANCY INC — $87,000 · EnvironmentLANDMARK CONSERVANCY …Westchester Land Trust Inc — $80,000 · EnvironmentWestchester Land Trus…PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST — $65,000 · EnvironmentWHALE AND DOLPHIN CONSERVATIONINC — $55,869 · EnvironmentBig Sur Land Trust — $50,000 · EnvironmentNORTHWOODS LAND TRUST INC — $50,000 · EnvironmentDucks Unlimited Inc — $50,000 · EnvironmentCENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES INC — $50,000 · Environment+6 more — $127,465 · Environment+6 moreTHE SEEING EYE INC — $200,000 · Human ServicesTHE SEEING EYE I…GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC — $126,825 · Human ServicesGUIDING EYES FOR…Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc — $117,500 · Human ServicesSoutheastern Gui…SUMMIT ASSISTANCE DOGS — $110,000 · Human ServicesSUMMIT ASSISTANC…Freedom Guide Dogs for the Blind Inc — $108,000 · Human ServicesFreedom Guide Do…KSDS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesKSDS ASSISTANCE …PARAGON SERVICE DOGS — $80,000 · Human ServicesPARAGON SERVICE …GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC — $65,000 · Human ServicesGUIDE DOGS FOR T…CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC — $50,000 · Human Services+2 more — $35,500 · Human ServicesARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $95,585 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $79,401 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Education+1 more — $204 · EducationYOSEMITE FOUNDATION — $167,300 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $5,000 · Recreation & SportsOIKONOS - ECOSYSTEM KNOWLEDGE — $25,000 · Science & TechOceans Initiative — $25,000 · Science & Tech
Other$2,543,481Animals$1,936,454Environment$1,362,282Human Services$1,042,825Education$185,190Recreation & Sports$172,300Science & Tech$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSEMPERVIRENS FUND — $285,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetNEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION — $239,178 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE SEEING EYE INC — $200,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSANTA BARBARA ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION — $194,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetYOSEMITE FOUNDATION — $167,300 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC — $159,662 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetVOICE FOR ASIAN ELEPHANTS SOCIETY — $157,500 over 5y, 24% of budgetNATURAL LAND INSTITUTE — $150,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetTHE NORTH CAROLINA AQUARIUM SOCIETY — $140,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC — $126,825 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDESERT BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $125,948 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PEREGRINE FUND INC — $125,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSoutheastern Guide Dogs Inc — $117,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetATLANTA FULTON COUNTY ZOO INC — $115,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSUMMIT ASSISTANCE DOGS — $110,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI — $110,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFreedom Guide Dogs for the Blind Inc — $108,000 over 3y, 7.9% of budgetBIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA — $103,330 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetKSDS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC — $100,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetNAPA COUNTY LAND TRUST — $96,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $95,585 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA FOREST ALLIANCE INC — $90,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetLANDMARK CONSERVANCY INC — $87,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetPARAGON SERVICE DOGS — $80,000 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetWestchester Land Trust Inc — $80,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $79,401 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF TRACY AVIARY — $69,900 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC — $65,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST — $65,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetChicago Zoological Society — $63,898 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF BONOBOS — $60,391 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetMONARCH RESEARCH PROJECT — $58,500 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetWHALE AND DOLPHIN CONSERVATIONINC — $55,869 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER — $55,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL — $54,935 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWORLD BIRD SANCTUARY — $51,504 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetBig Sur Land Trust — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWOODS LAND TRUST INC — $50,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $46,880 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CORAL REEF ALLIANCE — $45,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTURTLE CONSERVANCY — $44,821 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetThe Pacific Forest Trust Incorporated — $41,667 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC — $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Association …The Nature ConservancyPatagoniaorgClif Family FoundationMax & Victoria Dreyfu…National Fish and Wil…M J Murdock Charitabl…Anderson-Rogers Found…Cross Charitable Foun…Land Trust Alliance I…Thornton S Jr and Kat…Resources Legacy Fund
American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums IncMD23.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums Inc · The Nature Conservancy · Patagoniaorg · Clif Family Foundation · Max & Victoria Dreyfus Foundation Inc · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Anderson-Rogers Foundation Inc · Cross Charitable Foundation Attn John R Clark · Land Trust Alliance Inc · Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide Foundation · Resources Legacy Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Arthur L Bud Johnson in Memory of Elaine V Johnson Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Center for Coastal Studies Inc — 26% of income from government
  • Delaware Zoological Society Inc — 16% of income from government
  • New England Aquarium Corporation — 12% of income from government
  • Mote Marine Laboratory Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Whale and Dolphin Conservationinc — 3% of income from government
  • Clearwater Marine Aquarium Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Bok Tower Gardens Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
25report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Arthur L Bud Johnson in Memory of Elaine V Johnson Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Arthur L Bud Johnson in Memory of Elaine V Johnson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 107 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines