Skip to content

Texas · Public charity

Bat Conservation International

BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL's (bci) mission is to conserve the world's bats and their ecosystems to ensure a healthy planet. We are a science-based and results-focused organization dedicated to ending the extinction of the world's most vulnerable bat species.

$879k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
14
Itemized grants FY2025
3
Organizations funded FY2024
67%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$269k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$14,750
Largest grant, FY2025
$70,800
Organizations funded a year
1 to 6
FY2017 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
7
Total assets, FY2025
$36M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 67% of the organizations Bat Conservation International funded were first-time grantees, receiving 67% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving14$269k86%
FY20243$26k67%
FY20232$13k100%
FY20221$25k0%
FY20211$25k0%
FY20202$39k50%
FY20176$136kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$217kScience & Tech$118kInternational$75kEducation$39kPublic Benefit$31kYouth Development$18kAnimals$15kHealth$15kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
NY
IA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
AZ
KS
TN
DC
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Rainforest Trust$74,72730%
New Leaf Climate Partners$70,8001n/a
Texas Tech University System$48,7853n/a
University of Florida$43,5001n/a
Electric Power Research Institute Inc$30,9451n/a
Agricultural Research Service (Usda)$29,2231n/a
Wildlife Conservation Society$29,00010%
Rio Bravo Restoration$23,06526%
Gila Watershed Partnership of Arizona$22,22513%
Borderlands Restoration Network$22,02720%
Show all 23 grantees
All grantees of Bat Conservation International by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Rainforest Trust$74,72730%
New Leaf Climate Partners$70,8001n/a
Texas Tech University System$48,7853n/a
University of Florida$43,5001n/a
Electric Power Research Institute Inc$30,9451n/a
Agricultural Research Service (Usda)$29,2231n/a
Wildlife Conservation Society$29,00010%
Rio Bravo Restoration$23,06526%
Gila Watershed Partnership of Arizona$22,22513%
Borderlands Restoration Network$22,02720%
Rutgers the State University$17,6001n/a
Northern Arizona University$14,9141n/a
La Tierra del Jaguar$14,7501n/a
Kudo$14,6581n/a
Growers Supply$11,4411n/a
The University of Tennessee$10,7501n/a
Colorado State University$9,9821n/a
University System of New Hampshire$9,4661n/a
High Desert Native Plants LLC$9,0631n/a
Angelo State University$8,3001n/a
Candid$7,54110%
Kansas State University$5,5001n/a
North American Society for Bat Research$5,5001n/a

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Fish and Wildlife FoundationDC12.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Bat Conservation International with peer funders

About Bat Conservation International

How much does Bat Conservation International give?
Bat Conservation International reported 14 itemized grants totaling $269,336, out of $878,682 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 6 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2024.
What does Bat Conservation International fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Environment (41%), Science & Tech (22%), International (14%).
Who are Bat Conservation International's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Rainforest Trust ($75k), New Leaf Climate Partners ($71k), Texas Tech University System ($49k).
Does Bat Conservation International fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 67% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Bat Conservation International?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, Arizona Community Foundation.
Where is Bat Conservation International based?
Bat Conservation International is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bat Conservation International’s filings →

More from the funding graph