Skip to content

· Private foundation

Zlotoff Generations Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$495k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$4.3MHealth$441kEducation$213kRecreation & Sports$143kCommunity Improvement$38kHuman Services$36kPhilanthropy$32kInternational$32kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $77k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $386k
  • $250k+1 grant · $495k
$6,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$9.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ZLOTOFF FOUNDATION$495,000
DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$150,000
DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$125,000
Individual grant recipient$110,950
CHECKERED FLAG CHALLENGE$22,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
MICHIGAN ISRAEL BUSINESS ACCELERATOR$10,000
BLOOMFIELD HILLS FOUNDATION$10,000
MUSEUM OF AMERICAN SPEED$10,000
SHIFT UP NOW FOUNDATION$10,000
CROSS PURPOSE$7,000
DENVER RESCUE MISSION$6,500
MOTORSPORTS HALL OF FAMEOF AMERICA$5,000
BUILDING BURLINGTON'S FUTURE$5,000
PONTIAC TRANSPORTATION MUSEUM$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%REACHING HIGHER: $5k → 5%MICHIGAN LEAGUE FOR PUBLIC POLICY: $1k → 9%WHALEY CHILDREN'S CENTER: $1k → 16%REACHING HIGHER: $3k → 5%MICHIGAN LEAGUE FOR PUBLIC POLICY: $500 → 9%DENVER RESCUE MISSION: $7k → 12%DREAM CENTERS OF MICHIGAN: $5k → 8%DREAM CENTERS OF MICHIGAN: $2k → 8%DREAM CENTERS OF MICHIGAN: $5k → 8%JUDSON CENTER: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
CA
CO
NE
VA
NM
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.4M · 24 repeat orgs$370k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
41

Total granted

$5.4M
$159k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+39%

Still filing today

46%
34%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $212k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM
    5× · 2017–2021 · $300k · revenue +69%
  • HF
    HAVEN FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2025 · $16k · revenue +762%
  • NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $35k
  • YA
    YANKEE AIR MUSEUM
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • WO
    WOMEN OF TOMORROW MENTOR AND SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM INC
    one grant, 2022 · $14k · revenue -20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
2
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
3
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

—
4
Michigan Biotechnology Institute

Bridging the gap between early-stage innovation and commercial application. partnering to de-risk, develop and scale-up discoveries into commercially-viable technology packages.

Education
5
Delta Dental Fund

Delta dental fund's mission is to improve the oral health of the public and to advance dental science and the dental profession through research and education.

—
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Institute for Protein Innovation Inc

The institute for protein innovation is advancing protein science to accelerate research and improve human health.

Health
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
9
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
10
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
11
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Detroit; the most unlike its peers is Museum of American Speed. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/37
Grantees still filing
23/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ZLOTOFF FOUNDATION: $3,306,000 · Arts & CultureZLOTOFF FOUNDATIONDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $945,000 · Arts & CultureDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC+5 more: $21,080 · Arts & CultureIndividual grant recipient: $322,450 · OtherIndividual grant r…Individual grant recipient: $155,850 · OtherIndividual grant r…CHECKERED FLAG CHALLENGE: $136,000 · OtherCHECKERED FLAG CHA…Individual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant r…Individual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · Other+49 more: $239,158 · Other+49 moreHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $300,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $125,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $195,000 · Education+2 more: $3,300 · EducationDream Centers of Michigan: $12,250 · Human ServicesREACHING HIGHER INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesDENVER RESCUE MISSION: $6,500 · Human ServicesJUDSON CENTER INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesMICHIGAN LEAGUE FOR PUBLIC POLICY: $1,500 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesHIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC: $10,000 · InternationalAMERICA-ISRAEL FRIENDSHIP LEAGUE INC: $10,000 · InternationalIMPACTISRAEL INC: $5,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ALYN HOSPITALINC: $2,750 · InternationalSURGICAL EYE EXPEDITIONS INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 · InternationalDETROIT2NEPAL FOUNDATION: $1,000 · InternationalMICHIGAN ISRAEL BUSINESS ACCELERATOR: $10,000 · Community ImprovementCROSSPURPOSE: $7,000 · Community Improvement
Arts & Culture$4,272,080Other$998,458Health$426,000Education$198,300Human Services$31,750International$29,750Community Improvement$17,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetZLOTOFF FOUNDATION: $3,306,000 over 9y, 100% of budgetDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $945,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $300,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $195,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $125,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAVEN FOUNDATION: $16,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetWOMEN OF TOMORROW MENTOR AND SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM INC: $13,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDream Centers of Michigan: $12,250 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $11,850 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICA-ISRAEL FRIENDSHIP LEAGUE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetREACHING HIGHER INC: $8,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetDENVER RESCUE MISSION: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBuilding Burlingtons Future Corporation: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetIMPACTISRAEL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPBS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ALYN HOSPITALINC: $2,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJUDSON CENTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAMPLAIN ADAPTIVE MOUNTED PROGRAM INC: $2,400 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT: $2,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN LEAGUE FOR PUBLIC POLICY: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budget42STRONG: $1,090 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSURGICAL EYE EXPEDITIONS INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT DRAWDOWN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDETROIT2NEPAL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRILLIANT DETROIT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetX PRIZE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWhaley Children's Center Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA: $580 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAINT CREEK CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetISLAND ART ASSOCIATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ZLOTOFF FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds HAVEN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN OF TOMORROW MENTOR AND SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds Dream Centers of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds Museum of American Speed ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC ↗
  • Who funds HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN ISRAEL BUSINESS ACCELERATOR ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA-ISRAEL FRIENDSHIP LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds REACHING HIGHER INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSSPURPOSE ↗
  • Who funds DENVER RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds Building Burlingtons Future Corporation ↗
  • Who funds IMPACTISRAEL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI22.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Harold and Penny B Blumenstein Foundation Corporation · DTE Energy Foundation · The Kresge Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Zlotoff Generations Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Zlotoff Generations Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Brandeis University: 9% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Zlotoff Generations Fund?

Find your warmest path to Zlotoff Generations Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 82 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Zlotoff Generations’ filings →

More from the funding graph